Lurker > emblem-man

Bonuses tend to be taxed at an incorrect higher rate due to how withholding stuff works. It'll come back to you during tax returns though

I think some people actively change their withholding info if they know they'll be receiving bonuses soon. Don't know if that actually helps or not though. Seems like too much trouble.

Chipotle would have been the same price as going to the store to get a package of chicken breasts

Gobstoppers12 posted...

My point is not that women should be forced to carry babies, but rather that men should not be forced to pay for them.

Do you think men should be socially and culturally (not legally) pushed to pay for their children?

I feel like the word "fair" makes these discussions so dofficult. Many ople haven't fully internalize that "fair" doesn't always mean that something should be 100% equal

Bro, if you like eating meat that's fine. Stop being defensive towards vegans because you feel guilty

I keep mine at 78-80

LinkPizza posted...

But without an out, its punishes the man, and still may not even help the women and child much, if at all So, in that case, three people suffer instead of two

If the guy has so little money that he can't provide any financial support, then he won't. Like, I don't think any of us are saying we should garnish someone's wage by 90% and force him to have no discretionary income or something.

If the guy has money to provide, should he have a way out? I say no.

LinkPizza posted...

While its not suppose to be a punishment, for some people, it really is And the problem I have with it is that the women is the one who decides how their financial lives will play out. But the man doesnt get a say

Not everything in life has a 100 equivalent. I understand what you're trying to say, it feels unfair in a very real way. But I just fundamentally disagree with the idea behind that line of thinking and think it's incorrect to view it through those lens.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Yeah, definitely. No arguments from me there.

But I mean, is the govt then only going to provide what is deemed as the minimum? Should the parent have a responsibility to provide more than just the minimum that govt provides.

Govt should provide most of the support, but my point still stands I think.

LinkPizza posted...

Sure, it seems bad. But just because the father pays child support doesnt mean the child still wont suffer financially. For example, if the father doesnt make enough, not the child and father both suffer financially

Child support is just to limit the potential negatives due to lack of financial support.

If the father doesn't make much money, yes it will be unfair to him..same way it's unfair to the mother if she doesn't make any money. Like, sometimes shit just isn't "fair", however you define it. Having a child in the picture changes things.

Again, it's not about punishment to the mother or the father. It's about what's better for the kid

MedeaLysistrata posted...

I don't think you should look at this from a domination or revenge perspective.

This pretty much. I get why people jump to that perspective due to those stories we hear where the father has to pay ridiculous support payments. But it just feels like we're letting anecdotes control how we should think about it.

LinkPizza posted...

That would make sense if they wanted the kid. If they didnt want a kid (or didnt feel ready), then I could understand then not wanting to use their money to take care of them

Seems bad that the kid should financially suffer due to the father not feeling ready.

I guess I don't see child support as punishment for the father, but instead I see it as support for the child.

Obviously, there can be bad and unfair child support arrangements. But at its most basic, it's meant to support the child

Cleo_II posted...

I do get equity though so if it is successful I can get big bux

Any info on what the vesting timeline is for the stock options?

bigblu89 posted...

Simply put, if a woman feels they aren't ready, emotionally, financially, physically, whatever, to have a child, they can abort it. Should there be a male version of that situation, or is the man on the hook not matter what?

I mean, they aren't the same thing at all. There's now a child involved in the situation. A child that we should want to take care of.

I disagree with the idea 100%

Waffles for sure. Pancakes are just too...fluffy and soft for me.

Whatever their specialty is most likely

Lol, how much is that

ZevLoveDOOM posted...

and yeah, Dream always sounds and looks gloomy and depressive as hell.

then again, its supposed to be comic accurate from what i heard... >_>

never read the original comics but after seeing this show, i might just do that!

Check out the audible series also. Really good

Of course

Tag. This could be interesting

Jiek_Fafn posted...

Theyre wrinkled on the inside too and it feels fantastic

Ribbed for his pleasure

SamsungGearS2 posted...

My first real relationship was with a woman nearly twice my age, while she wasnt hot she bought me alcohol to buzz me into threesomes with her and her teenage daughter who was hot.

Brah..

Oh wow, that's crazy.
Lol, mine at 6 months

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/8/1/AADgb_AADnwh.jpg

mustachedmystic posted...

Yeah, the thing about being a kid is that you are short and your center of gravity is lower. So falling is much less dangerous, and painful. But when you are 63, you are much more likely to break something falling, and I gotta imagine anyone would fall quite a bit when first learning skateboarding.

Watching kids snowboard is fucking wild. So fearless and when they fall, it's nothing to them

Shii, just realized there's a skate park less than 10 minutes away from where I live.

Devilanse333 posted...

Can get a good board for around 50 bucks. Trucks are also inexpensive. Its the bearings that will get you. Dont skimp on them, though.

Is that $50 just for the deck? How much for a fully built board?

How much would a good skateboard be? Something I could use to do tricks and shit

Tyranthraxus posted...

I forget the exact timing but the ratio was literally equal parts water & white rice. Fill up a cup with rice, dump it in, fill up the exact same cup with water and dump that in, then pressure cook for something like 5-7 minutes.

Hmm I'll have to try that. I've been doing high pressure for 13 minutes and 1 cup of rice to 1.5 cups of water but I found it was kinda mushy. So I wanted to see if washing the rice beforehand helped with that as well.

Tyranthraxus posted...

I use instant pot. It's not exactly a rice cooker but it produces identical results.

This. I got one as a gift and I threw away my rice cooker during my last move. I'm still trying to get the ratios on point though. It's not yet cooking it how I like it.

Stressful. It's just annoying in general and pretty dang dangerous.

Slaya4 posted...

Marry: Zendaya
Dump: Pokimane
Fuck: Watson

This.

I haven't skateboarded since I was like 10 but I've been thinking about it a lot. Not longboarding but like doing tricks and stuff.

It wouldn't be weird seen a 32 year old trying to land a kick flip right?

I don't really find conservative Hispanics that surprising. Look at Cubans or venezuelans for example. Social conservativism from a possible Catholic upbringing. Economic conservatism based on socialism fear they have from those countries.

Confederate Hispanic is an interesting one though. Just someone who got really into the ideology and made it part of their identity

Good move. Hope you enjoy it

Svu is weird though because if I see it on TV, I feel compelled to complete watching it

COVxy posted...

Libertarians mostly don't give a fuck about freedom. They say things like "you should be able to choose whether or not you want to put your hard earned cash towards charity/public works"

But what they mean is:
"I don't want to put my hard earned cash towards charity/public works".

And the popularity of means testing benefits or work requirements for welfare shows how "stingy" people would be if we really did do a charity based approach where the money leaving your hands is less abstract than it is with taxes

To be fair to some libertarians, they aren't against helping other people. They just think it should be solely voluntary in the for form of charity.

I mean, I disagree and think it's a bit naive, but I can understand that some actually believe this. They're just wrong

I think many people would agree with the skepticism of large governmental power, reduction of unnecessary regulations like occupational licensing, weed, foreign policy,etc.

The issue is libertarians just end up taking it a step further and fully agreeing with the ideology gets weird for certain topics

I agree, I found it weird when we told people

Bump

Baby fell of the couch with the wife first.

Baby just fell of the bed while with me
That cry...

Darkprince12 posted...

Its nice until you have some dishes that are really caked and you have to still clean by hand

That's what I was thinking and what I've experienced before, but I had some pretty caked in stuff and it worked pretty well.

Lol, I also recently watched this https://youtu.be/_rBO8neWw04

So I don't know if using the pods compared to the powder has led to just really bad performance for people.

Set it to start before I went to bed and checked it this morning. It cleaned really well.
Think imma start using it more. I can get used to this

emblem-man posted...

https://www.farnamstreetblog.com/2014/05/hunter-s-thompson-to-hume-logan/?utm_source=pocket_mylist

To expand on this, I'm still looking and trying to figure out if I have what it takes to have a purpose. Or if I need to get comfortable with the fact that I won't have one.

She also cooperated with them when they asked for information, unlike Trump