Lurker > cuttin_in_farm

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Not a single post blamed TC.

Every post states what one shouldnt do as a precaution.

The cries of victim blaming is so stupid because it implies people arent putting all or majority of the blame on the one committing the crime. Which is a very lazy way to think of comments.

Irony posted...

The idea that Garlic Jr could go from barely being able to take on Piccolo and Goku at the beginning of Dragon Ball Z to overpowering post-Namek Piccolo because of a dumb star is ridiculous.

Frieza being unable to beat Namek Goku, but training four months allows him to keep up with a much more tenured Goku somehow.

Dr. Gero somehow makes two humans stronger than Super Saiyan Vegeta.

Gohan goes from losing to Majin Buu to handling Super Buu because his potential was unlocked. Again.

Android 17 can match SSB by beating up poachers.

Dragon Ball has never cared about logical power scaling.

pinky0926 posted...

It's simple. Legs are hard to train.

Theyre also the least fun workouts.

I feel great after a good upper body workout.

Leg workouts just piss me off and make me feel not good.

People who dislike it just say so because its not canon.

It also had Krillins best outfit.

Kinda boring tbh.

Love interest dies for story arc of male protag is a bit of a dead horse. Make it a child and maybe it wouldnt be so cliche. A hero having to face his wife/lover every day afterwards would have weight.

The story could be better if the protagonist actually morphs into the villain of the story as he slowly accepts that killing is warranted. Itd at least be different and actually show how one progresses to Wed be no better than the bad guys.

All my opinion of.

What about Wario/Waluigi?

Guide posted...

Sure we can, but the likelihood is far less.

What makes you claim this?

TerraSeeker posted...

Worst case scenario I randomly get killed. But that can really happen anywhere. I'm not living my life ruled by fear.

@TerraSeeker

I hope you dont lock car doors or your home. Itd be a shame to live your life ruled by fear.

The point is dudes seemingly taking zero precaution. Thats stupid.

Prestoff posted...

You're not wrong we have the internet, but the issue is that there is soo much garbage out there that it's hard to filter what is good information to what is garbage. Some of those advice they give online may not even by relevant to the job you're looking for.

@cuttin_in_farm

I would highly suggest going to one of those "resume workshops". It played a huge role to shaping my resume to look and sound better. The best part was that I could talk to someone directly and allow them to help make my resume good directly than just trying to figure it out on my own. I agree that there should be a highschool class that teaches life bare necessities like resume building, filing income tax and mortgages, etc. in general.

Sure, there are resources. Theres resources on how to conduct interviews too.

The problem is that this isnt a skill that is cultivated naturally. And unlike communication or public speaking (which helps with interviews), writing a resume is not a thing that is taught, like youre saying. Which sucks.

Add in depending on the role, location, and ones experience, advice can be shoddy (Ive seen advice online from recruiters saying having personal hobbies on your resume is a good idea). I think bad resumes can be given some leniency. Like, my mother has been at her employer for 20+ years and has not needed to apply for anything. I really doubt she could come out and write a decent resume.

Copy n paste resumes with no proof reading is just unacceptable though.

I was gonna post a snarky remark about how this topic is condescending to a group of folks who are given zero ability to construct good resumes since its not a skill thats taught nor will employers give feedback on submissions.

But then I saw TCs example and well thats pretty bad.

Kuuko posted...

Maybe I'm a boomer but I can't fathom how so many people flock to a single random youtuber guy to give them their opinions on complex international geopolitics

Is it any different than people tuning into a singular news station?

Cookie Crisp Dog being missing is unacceptable. Fred isnt even a cereal original.

Topics like this confuse.

Are dudes truly so dumb to think they cant be harmed at night alone?

Ferroseed posted...

posting a picture doesnt break a feature tho. if somebody has pictures hidden by default they wont see it unless they click it and nothing you do can break that. censor bypassing actually gets past the filter.

I feel youre missing the point.

Why is posting a picture not censor bypassing? is the question.

Gunplaya supporters in a nutshell.

I think topics like these miss the mark on one particularly influencing factor.

Not all women are healthy/know what they would like.

Because of this, redpill dudes or bad guys can still get women. And to guys with bad luck with women, its hard to convince them that redpill wont work when they see it working on women.

CE in general very frequently doesnt factor in feelings and emotions when it comes to people (which is ironic, because redpill loves touting logic and biology. When they are only successful because of ethos pandering).

Most advice alternative to redpill doesnt really work in practice. For a multitude of reasons. A guy who isnt good with women, imo, is more likely to be the wants to listen, is caring, has goals type.

But there is a distinction that must be made to build sexual attraction. Without it, youre just a good friend. Cause whats the difference between a man/woman friendship vs a husband/wife?

A lot of guys who have trouble dating probably are just overly cautious or safe when building attraction. Which the redpill focuses on heavily. Alternative advice kinda doesnt.

Is it against ToS to cal someone a motherfucker?

Cause I have a pretty good post cooked up, but I want people to see it lol.

Can yall shut the fuck up so I can lock the topic?

ArkhamOrigins posted...

Posting moderations is not a clear violation?

It is, but for the sake of context, I was willing to risk it. A mod kinda baited me, imo, but I wont assume that was his intention. I coulda misread his post.

StealThisSheen posted...

Why did you even screenshot the topic to begin with?

Because I was posting something but it said the topic no longer exists. I was genuinely confused on what was mod worthy, so I hit the back button on my phone, and screenshot the OP for this topic.

Kloe_Rinz posted...

The context of the topic was TC complaining people didnt emphasise with Nazis. You keep dodging whenever I bring up you immediately deflect to oh it must have been deleted due to ad hominem

Bro, who the ever living fuck are you? I do not care about what you have to say, bro lmao.

COVxy posted...

Dude, we know your acknowledgement is insincere because you read and screenshotted the post to begin with. Are we to believe that it got modded, you went to make a topic outraged about the moderation, all while never considering the obvious flaming at the end of the post?

Yes. Thats correct. You lazy fucks is so tame, its not on my radar. Especially for a place where shut the fuck up is allowed.

In short

cuttin_in_farm posted...

You assuming worst case intentions aint my problem.

Im in my robe chilling right now. Yall legit keeping this topic alive for no reason for way too long. I stopped posting at post 130. I come back and yall still going.

Jesus.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Read the edit. You assuming worst case intentions aint my problem.

cuttin_in_farm posted...

Im confused on why the topic was deleted. I had my post ready and everything.

Use the context of the actual topic, bro.

Kloe_Rinz posted...

hes already dodging when I brought up hes latching onto ad hominem out of desperation

Youre confusing posters?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Hm? You failed to read once.

Youre bold to try again.

The problem with CE is exemplified in this post. I dunno if yall deal with nothing but trolls in discords or something, but the constant need to assume the most negative motivations is extremely sad and pessimistic.

Hey Shock. Where did I even make a claim about the topic being deleted and its reason? Was I perhaps asking why it was deleted? With what my guess was? In which case I immediately acknowledged it was flaming once the idea was thrown out?

I know youre a gunpla lackey, so you cant perceive folks beyond first impressions. But at least dont toss out weird character accusations when we can read the posts.

cuttin_in_farm posted...

Im confused on why the topic was deleted. I had my post ready and everything.

Couldnt read that far?

cuttin_in_farm posted...

Id give you context if posting a moderated message gets you moderated wasnt a rule.

Lmao. Check what happens when you post context. Someone deleted it

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]



[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Bandit_Keith posted...

You keep saying this, but he did acknowledge it.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/80558523/975915225

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]



So after being proven wrong in real time, you dont even have the humility to shut the fuck up and admit youre wrong. All because you didnt even wanna read the first 35 posts. I literally acknowledged that was the reason five posts after someone brought it up.

In short, get off my dick, bro.

RchHomieQuanChi posted...

It's funny how every single time a topic like this comes up, the OP refuses to provide any context

Almost as if they're deliberately omitting key information

Di-did you read the topic? I gave it like, 5 posts later >_>

Fuck. Ninjad

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


I think you understand what a typical pro-lifers stance is, but you dont use their logic or reasoning when refuting.

You use science and stuff. Which is, on paper, completely fine.

But a pro-lifer for the most part is using an emotional stance. So science and objective reasoning wont be as effective, imo.

I think you comprehend the stance fine. I just dont necessarily agree with your approach in addressing it.

But you are not someone I think of with my post. I moreso think of folks who genuinely think pro-lifers only want to control women. And they dont care about the baby.

COVxy posted...

Lmao, the dude is nothing compared to what he was.

Who's Milo?

The only reason bigotry has risen to the level of national campaigns is because Trump normalized it. It's not like bigots didn't exist. It's that they were much more powerless because their "issues" being on the national stage would have been a fever dream.

This is actually a decent point tbh.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


I didnt interpret the post as defending nazis, bro. Your perpetually online, pessimistic mindset may have tho.

Now shut the fuck up.

BunkerBoy posted...

They do not

Okay.

Solar_Crimson posted...

People who want to at best disenfranchise minorities and at worst want to wipe them out can be very strongly argued to be evil, yes.

Got it.

Alright, I said my piece. Im good. I gotta remember this is online shit. Back to life.

lolife67 posted...

I'm not removing anything. He literally just said in Post 45 that asking people to empathize with bigots shouldn't be moderated. Don't be purposely obtuse. His intention was very clear.

Bro, that post happened five minutes ago. I didnt see that yet.

The TC may have been in bad faith, but I dont think that alone deserves moderation. Until it was pointed out he was flaming.

Like jesus, yall dont even know what my point is in this topic lol. The irony.

COVxy posted...

Who's Tucker Carlson?

The guy that now has his own interview show? Platforming and sympathizing with the likes of Andrew Tate and Trump? I hope youre not implying he was successfully deplatformed.

BunkerBoy posted...

Mainly because it's disingenuous. They don't give a fuck about the baby

They care about murder. Which is the claim.

But keep thinking those who dont agree with you are pure evil or something

lolife67 posted...

What's offensive about suggesting people be more understanding of bigotry?

You remove the context. He stated that reducing th bigotry to cruelty is the point is not a productive strategy.

Hes not saying befriend nazis ffs.

BunkerBoy posted...

This is almost always the case though. Because whenever a law or discussion comes up to help mothers and children, most "pro life" people are against it. They're only pro life in the case of abortion. Once the kid is born, it can die on the street for all they care

This is blatantly proving my point lol. What does any of that have to do with the claim Youre killing a baby.?

But this isnt an abortion topic.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Ohhh, good point. You may be right.

mercurydude posted...

There's a way these issues can be discussed here and it not be deleted. TC wasn't interested in that. He was going for a "won't somebody think of the poor bigots? You're persecuting them!" angle.

My confusion is that if that was his angle, who cares? The entire topic was shitting on him.

Why delete the topic? Whats offensive?

Murphiroth posted...

What exactly am I supposed to understand and empathize with when it comes to groups that actively want to harm other people?

Fuck that guy.

I dont think that was the point. I was gonna post this:

TC, emphasize is the wrong word.

Comprehend is better. And the benefit is that one can better argue against harmful rhetoric if you actually understand why someone is doing something.

If you are arguing against the pro-lifers, for example. If you cant comprehend that they believe you are killing a baby, and instead, focus on you just want to control women.

Then the engagement in general is pointless. Just to give an example.

I think that was the point, but the TC was stupid and went off the rails.

Tyranthraxus posted...

For a minute there I was going to explain but you don't really want an explanation and you wouldn't accept one that was given to you.

Okay.

Skype posted...

It's not even 11 am on a Thursday morning and TC is mad that people don't want to engage with someone that's asking people to empathize with a group that wants to harm other protected groups.

Nah, if people didnt wanna engage they wouldnt of posted.

Im confused on why the topic was deleted. I had my post ready and everything.

COVxy posted...

The stupid shit never gets normalized as a valid stance by deplatforming.

It only gets deplatformed on the platforms you use. Itll be platformed elsewhere.

Its like if your kid asks about lgbt stuff in a conservative house and the parents just say dont talk about that.

Like, bro. Its 2023. People have so many avenues to run into this stuff.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/0/2/AAZ897AAE0Zi.jpg

But this is the context. What about this is mod worthy? Can following posts cause a topic to be deleted?

COVxy posted...

Sometimes a discourse literally doesn't exist and the only people trying to have a "conversation" are people trying to convince others or trolling.

Fuck off, the best thing to do about right-wing fascism is to delete it.

Wouldnt this do nothing to prevent fascism from growing?

Like, lurkers and people on the fence will never be convinced not to trust it if the topics refuting the stupid shit never happen, no?

MC_BatCommander posted...

You know like 99% of the time when I see this "deleted for different opinions" thing it always overlooks a clear rule violation. Without context I have no idea what you're talking about though

Id give you context if posting a moderated message gets you moderated wasnt a rule.

Is that where were at? Even when the entire topic comprises of people refuting TC.

This place sucks for discourse lol. Nobody was harmed lol.

So another character who wont get dlc voicelines, huh?

UnfairRepresent posted...

Your building is on fire and starts to collaspe. As you and your girlfriend try to escape, parts of the ceiling cave in and a big pile of debirs lands ontop of you, pinning you to the ground.

Shes forgiven. I would not ask her to help in this scenario. Just gtfo.