Lurker > nocturnal_traveler

sand land game https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SatQjDO6K24
https://www.nintendolife.com/news/2024/01/alisa-developers-cut-channels-ps1-survival-horror-in-all-the-right-ways alisa

https://youtu.be/-RpFqlpPwmY
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1911360/Trinity_Fusion/

where can i find a GF like her

What if he is though?

"Social media made y'all way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face for it" - Mike Tyson

This is easy to say in an accepting environment but there are many lgbt youths that have to hide their identities from their parents/peers due to living in a more conservative area. Hell, even in liberal areas bullying that's accepted by the popular crowd/faculty is a documented problem. Not to mention, employers who might hesitate on promotions or treat people worse for stuff they don't agree with.
Even besides all that stuff, there's just simple privacy we all like. I mean, let's be honest are you willing to share your real name and address right now on here and have a photo of you as your profile pic?

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/0/0b90155c.jpg
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/f/f5108b4a.jpg
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/8/8b162130.jpg

I don't know if I want to be known as a Feline Attracted Person.

(Yes, the letters are intentional.)

Everyone should have a right to privacy

I'm pretty sure the government knows I have Rule 34 of The Lion King. I'm not sure if I want your average Joe to have access to that information. Or maybe it'll be like a Scarlet Letter scenario -- but with everyone having a giant A on their chest.

"You're into cuckolding and diapers. You do not judge me."

Oh, I didn't mean it as a criticism, and I've been a victim of split-second auto-correct as I hit send/post. I just didn't see a reason to care about limiting POTUS's ability to post anonymously.

The rules of pretty much every sport have changed a ton over time. Should we change the names of all of them?

That's a very fair question to ask.
And given the immense bloated defense budget, you'd think they could provide more.
That's true.

I didn't leave it out so much as just not address it because it didn't need addressing.
does make me think I'd like to know which countries are providing the best veterans support tho

other countries can afford not to have a bloated military budget because they don't provide defense for other countries like we do

you people realize how much europe outsources their war materiel? their supplies their training their troops? their defensive strategy is "hold out until america saves the day" and you know it

ChatGPT is super easy to use. Anyone can give it a try.

How would this even be enforced? This is nonsense.

Another victim of Freddy Fazbear

i dont think itll drop down to $40 ever. Thats Nintendo for you

I might call 8 a good score, it's just not a "damn good" score. Damn is too strong a modifier for 8

Is a 5/10 a failing grade or 'not bad, not great'? There's no central authority to point at to resolve this, and there are great reviewers doing serious work that use either scale.

How a medium's scores tend to look is influenced by many factors including from consumers, from industry and from critics themselves. Even if you think the typical 7/10 scored game on say metacritic should be scored higher or lower, that is de facto the scale in the medium.

For videogames, it really isn't. Video game scores are super inflationary and the average score of an average game is higher than that of the average, say, movie. In gaming a 7 means mediocre or serious but not game-breaking issues. A 9-9.5 is a 'damn good' score at this point. 8 is 'fine'.

lmao, probably because Homelander doesn't care about color, he cares about if someone's a supe or not, and more specifically, anyone not remotely as strong as he is.

Did AIPAC fund Jan 6th?

Electronic Gaming Monthly gave it 35 out of 40

Vara Dark is an independent:

https://twitter.com/Vara_Dark/status/1286359066613358594

Don't misrepresent my goddess.

One of the reasons Stephen Colbert stopped being a conservative parody was because people unironically believed he was real and followed him.

Anytime conservative politics are satired it happens. Its sadly hilarious.

The "impossible to trigger right winger" crowd everyone.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/2/2221360f.jpg

So actually inequality is down the last couple years:
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/30/low-wage-workers-saw-tremendously-fast-wage-growth-since-2019.html
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/economy/americans-are-finally-getting-raise-thanks-lower-inflation-rcna93844

All youtubers and streamers are Logan Paul levels of scammers. No exceptions.

because ive experienced the situation from literally all angles, and the person with the absolute smallest contribution to the issue is the customer?

Bill Burr has successfully dodged every controversy this way by just never really bringing shit like this up. he understand how fickle the internet is. In two weeks time these people won't even remember there was ever an issue.

I don't know why more celebrities don't employ this tactic. As soon as you commit to an apology or a statement you're basically creating a permanent outrage on your record.

Expecting GameFAQs polls to be accurate information is a strange phenomenon. I usually see it in people who care way too much about this place.