Lurker > Nomadic View

billcom6 posted...

Kazi1212 posted...

Liberals can complain how bad these tax cuts are all they want, the fact of the matter is struggling families will see a bigger paycheck thanks to it. When youre in that position youll gladly take what you can get. Its easy saying how bad these tax cuts are from the sidelines, but ~$100 extra a month can make a tangible difference for burdened families

No one is complaining about tax cuts for struggling families.

People are complaining about millionaires and billionaires getting huge cuts at the expense of important government programs.

Yeah, the tax cuts are nice, but the filthy billionaireses benefit too! And we hateses them!
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Im fine with it. I especially like the space.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Hinakuluiau posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Then add context.

That seems to be the point of a rebuttal.

I think thats a completely fair response.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Hinakuluiau posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Anteaterking posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Its just a crap shoot about what I speculate, but if youre asking. I expect evidence of a witch hunt. A reliance on information that the FBI knows is false, but uses it anyway.

Thats not based on anything substantial though.

I just can't see Wray getting really defensive of it if it's something that solely lies on Comey and McCabe.

My assumption is that anyone that is defensive of it coming out is likely implicated in the corruption directly or indirectly.

Or the memo is taking certain elements of the testimony out of context and they're on the defensive because they're concerned that it could lead to kneejerk reactions based off false statements.

Then add context.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Anteaterking posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Its just a crap shoot about what I speculate, but if youre asking. I expect evidence of a witch hunt. A reliance on information that the FBI knows is false, but uses it anyway.

Thats not based on anything substantial though.

I just can't see Wray getting really defensive of it if it's something that solely lies on Comey and McCabe.

My assumption is that anyone that is defensive of it coming out is likely implicated in the corruption directly or indirectly.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

It got me modded. At the time it was a 3kl because the moderator could easily figure out what the word was, and its offensive.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Ego
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Anteaterking posted...

For people who think that the memo is going to be damaging, what do you think it's going to say? It seems like everyone already "knows" what is in there, but I haven't heard any actual legal wrong doing contained in it.

Its just a crap shoot about what I speculate, but if youre asking. I expect evidence of a witch hunt. A reliance on information that the FBI knows is false, but uses it anyway.

Thats not based on anything substantial though.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The Great Muta 22 posted...

Anyone supporting the release of a partisan memo and expecting it to be "THE COMPLETE TRUTH!" is an utter fool. Nunes has revealed himself repeatedly to be a complete partisan hack that's acting as an agent for the WH and anyone who actually cared about the truth and transparency should be pushing for the entire transcript to be dropped, not cherry picked bullet points that are specifically designed in a way to shape a narrative and message.

The memo wasnt created for the public records. It was created for personal records and business inside. Theres no reason to spin this for political gain, it was never created for public consumption.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Bloodychess posted...

This thread is a fucking mess

Yeah.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Is there a single post from the left that is arguing context?

I skimmed for one but all I saw was but Republicans and Admiral scares me.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The country is so divided I dont think this will have any impact no matter what.

The right will blow it out of proportion. Sean Hannity is already claiming this makes Watergate look like someone stealing a snickers from a grocery store by comparison.

The left will just cry that its all lies and anything that is negative in the memo isnt true.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

WWE Games Social Board was my original home. Then LUE was my home for years. After it died I came here.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

HypnoCoosh posted...

Democrats.

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Kirbys Dream Land.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

synth_real posted...

Did anybody really give a damn about karma loss anyway? Unless it's a new account, I always thought it was a pretty meaningless e-peen score

A long time ago high karma users meant something. Today there are hundreds of accounts with 10+ years on them that have a decent load of karma on them. Its just not that big of a deal anymore.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

*wears an outfit that is made from less material than a band-aid*

OMG! Stop eye raping me, pervert!
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

HypnoCoosh posted...

Why is alucard a mod trolling the admiral?

Well, he called him buddy in a demeaning and sarcastic manner. Under the same logic that genius was moderated so should buddy. But you know, mods are above the TOS.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Why don't we have Bernie instead? He's better than Hillary on literally every issue where they differ

Because you support a party that corruptly nominated someone despite its constituents interests. As long as you bow your head and do as Democrats demand of you they will never have a reason to pacify you. Why would they? They own your vote.

No they don't lol. I wrote in Bernie instead of voting Shillary

My bad.

I do apologize and commend your willingness to stand by your ideals.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Coffeebeanz posted...

I would say Hillary is the worst "serious" candidate of all time, but honestly the results speak for themselves.

I assume youre referring to Trump? What results speak for themselves as to his inadequacy?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Why don't we have Bernie instead? He's better than Hillary on literally every issue where they differ

Because you support a party that corruptly nominated someone despite its constituents interests. As long as you bow your head and do as Democrats demand of you they will never have a reason to pacify you. Why would they? They own your vote.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I dont see any incentive for it at all. Especially not for a $1k price tag. The phone I got does everything I need and more.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

TrojanPony posted...

DevsBro posted...

Since super hard mode is like 80's normal

Do you only play Kirby or something? Games in the 80s were only difficult because people were either literal children or grossly inexperienced with gaming as a whole.

Kirby was hard? Thats the only game I ever perfected in my life. I could play the entire game without taking a single point of damage.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

As a Trump supporter, I do too.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The internet.

Before codes were sold to game magazines. Then people bypassed the magazine and looked them up online. Now companies have no incentive to implement codes.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Its worse, but I like that once you have all the characters unlocked you can play through the game again with any of the heroes. I hated how in the first one you could only play some of the heroes for the last few levels.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The Admiral posted...

You'll get far milder than loser moderated.

That has more to do with who you are. There is a clear and apparent bias in how the moderations are dispensed. That just looks more like an excuse to hit you than an actual violation.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

CNN
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Political outlets that agree with them will lavish them with praise and attention.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

A_Good_Boy posted...

Genghis Khan

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

r4X0r posted...

Far as I can tell there actually aren't any standards to what's moddable at this point and it's just shooting in the dark.

Its entirely dependent on who the offender is and who the victim is and whether or not the mod likes or dislikes those people.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The hycath macaw has a .05% drop rate from a rare mob, and a .01% drop rate from basic mobs in Strangle Throne Vale. -WoWhead
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

-Gavirulax- posted...

Asherlee10 posted...

It's the shortened version of [an excuse for the mods to hit me].

I got modded for calling myself that.

I mean, I'm glad someone took offense on my behalf, just imagine how hurt I didn't know my feelings were.

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Im getting over $4k back in taxes because Trump doubled the child tax credit. That extra money is really going to help.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I liked the modern day approach to fantasy races. The core story was fairly generic though.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Says this topic is no longer available for viewing.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I like the diversity of gameplay. Its what I like about most Blizzard games, the classes feel unique and different from each other.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Is it basically just Fuck Trump and Me Too the sequel?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

r4X0r posted...

Doing something as simple as making a point and backing it with government statistics will get you moderated.

Did it get overturned? I had the same thing happen to me. I linked to the FBIs official site and it was hit for offensive. It got overturned though. I assume you got hit by the same mod.

This is exactly why moderators should not have anonymity.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

This topic wont last long.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Zikten posted...

Nomadic View posted...

I think this is completely ridiculous.

Im sorry, xXxsephirothxXx69, but you have been observed supporting a candidate that does not align with our values here at Blizzard. Your account has been temporarily suspended until you refrain from posting about such unacceptable behavior. Thank you.

I doubt they would ban all trump voters from their games. that would make them lose like half their american customers

Absolutely. Im being hyperbolic. Its still an asinine precedent.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I think this is completely ridiculous.

Im sorry, xXxsephirothxXx69, but you have been observed supporting a candidate that does not align with our values here at Blizzard. Your account has been temporarily suspended until you refrain from posting about such unacceptable behavior. Thank you.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=639s&v=d4FHWVlj80M

Teal Deer: Blizzard will be monitoring YouTube and Facebook posts. If you say something that Blizzard deems naughty and if your post can be tied to a Blizzard account, you will face consequences including having your Blizzard account banned.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Bullet_Wing posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Bullet_Wing posted...

Michigan authorities first crossed paths with Griesemer last fall.

On September 19, a man -- later identified as Griesemer -- called an employee at an Islamic center in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and made derogatory comments about the mosque and Muslims, an FBI agent said in the affidavit

Griesemer, whose age was not given, also made disparaging statements about Jewish people, African-Americans and the network in several calls, the affidavit said.


One guess who this guy voted for

Probably Trump.

But if you want to play that game, I wonder who the guy that shot at Republicans at a baseball game voted for?

While I have no love for Bernie, there's a major difference there. Bernie was actually against everything that guy stood for while Trump fans the "fake news" and anti minority flames in his cultists. With each passing day it becomes more and more apparent that MAGA actually means Minority Americans: Go Away

Bernie wasnt against everything the guy stood for. Quite the contrary actually. Bernie did state that he did not encourage violence, and Trump hasnt stated that he did encourage violence against CNN. Im going to err on the side that Trump doesnt condone that, but Ill eat my words if he actually endorses this nut.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Sometimes. If Im cooking and I get sauce or something on my hands, yeah.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

[current president] is the worst president of all time! -[every year]
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Bullet_Wing posted...

Michigan authorities first crossed paths with Griesemer last fall.

On September 19, a man -- later identified as Griesemer -- called an employee at an Islamic center in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and made derogatory comments about the mosque and Muslims, an FBI agent said in the affidavit

Griesemer, whose age was not given, also made disparaging statements about Jewish people, African-Americans and the network in several calls, the affidavit said.


One guess who this guy voted for

Probably Trump.

But if you want to play that game, I wonder who the guy that shot at Republicans at a baseball game voted for?

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>