Lurker > Jakyl25

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Board List
Page List: 1 ... 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 132: WHAT HAPPENED now available in fantasy sections
Jakyl25
09/11/17 7:58:26 PM
#206
https://twitter.com/jesselehrich/status/907313368972886017

I don't think this is THAT bad, but watch it. That last shot fade into "Never Forget" is suuuuper awkward
---
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 132: WHAT HAPPENED now available in fantasy sections
Jakyl25
09/11/17 7:46:13 PM
#205
Sorry to burst that bubble for you
---
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 132: WHAT HAPPENED now available in fantasy sections
Jakyl25
09/11/17 7:03:01 PM
#202
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 132: WHAT HAPPENED now available in fantasy sections
Jakyl25
09/11/17 2:57:08 PM
#194
I think he meant the Senate
---
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 132: WHAT HAPPENED now available in fantasy sections
Jakyl25
09/11/17 10:30:17 AM
#174
Yes we know Antifa are way too rowdy

But at least they're not trying to run people over
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
09/11/17 8:27:15 AM
#335
I really don't think anything else matters

She at least presented herself as a foreign government agent. You knew that when you took the meeting. You gotta report it.
---
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 132: WHAT HAPPENED now available in fantasy sections
Jakyl25
09/10/17 11:14:15 PM
#166
CelesMyUserName posted...
Looking over to CE was a really bad decision

https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/400-current-events/75761111/886367197

The bar for what gets called "PC Outrage" has just dropped so incredibly low, I don't even know where it is now. Like early on with the "SJW" stuff I could agree certain types would go absurdly overboard... but now things have bent completely backwards and we're now calling it "outrage" to be offended by straight up hateful racial slurs, what the fuck?


I wonder if it'll be the same excuse from Pewds as his Nazi apology

"I didn't know people still used it to oppress others!"
---
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 132: WHAT HAPPENED now available in fantasy sections
Jakyl25
09/10/17 10:11:26 PM
#161
Are any of those sources in that article reputable? Because that site doesn't seem to be in and of itself
---
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 132: WHAT HAPPENED now available in fantasy sections
Jakyl25
09/09/17 1:03:20 PM
#7
Corrik posted...
Anyways. I mentioned this before but... Trumps facebook post today leads me to believe he wants DACA passed into law as is.


I think this is true, and it in part explains why he's working with Dems now, because their debt ceiling plan forces the issue on Congressional DACA action

That doesn't excuse Trump imposing a 6 month window on it or else he'll ruin their lives if Congress doesn't get to work
---
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 132: WHAT HAPPENED now available in fantasy sections
Jakyl25
09/09/17 1:00:03 PM
#6
Corrik posted...
I would say respect for knowledge of the law. I haven't watched the video though to see how she actually reacts during the situation.


Prints out the rule to show it to the cop, gets her supervisor on the phone to explain it to the cop, cop goes berserk
---
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 132: WHAT HAPPENED now available in fantasy sections
Jakyl25
09/09/17 12:28:52 PM
#1
On pace to win a Hugo
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
09/08/17 10:29:53 AM
#319
1.) Who she prefers to win the election doesn't matter. By ANYONE'S account, she at the very least went to the meeting with the intention of discussing Russian adoption policy in the event Trump won. If that's an important policy issue to her, why would hatred of Trump matter? You're telling us not to be emotionally led with regard to geopolitics, yet you're trying to use her emotions towards Trump against us as though they matter.

2.) That's you taking their word that nothing of substance was presented at the meeting. I'm not sure why you would trust that account of the meeting considering Don Jr has already changed his recollection of the meeting multiple times.
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
09/08/17 10:04:36 AM
#316
Will you agree that, if she IS actually an agent of the Russian government, that it would be illegal under that clause to obscure the meeting on government disclosure forms?
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
09/07/17 4:34:53 PM
#311
All those seeking a security clearance and access to classified information are required to complete a Standard Form 86, or SF-86. This lengthy (over 100 pages) questionnaire is painfully familiar to many government employees. The federal government uses the information in the SF-86 to conduct a background investigation and determine whether access to classified information is appropriate.

The SF-86 requires you to report detailed information about your personal background, employment history, education, marital status, family members, places you have lived, travel, and much more. It also asks about foreign contacts and foreign activities.

In particular, question 20B.6 asks whether the applicant has had any contact at all with any foreign governments or their representatives in the past seven years. If the answer is “yes,” the applicant must provide detailed information about those contacts.

All high-level members of the new administration would have filled out an SF-86. The allegation concerning Kushner, Flynn, Sessions, and others is that when completing the form they failed to report their various meetings with Russian officials.


The instructions for the SF-86 include the following warning:

The U.S. Criminal Code (title 18, section 1001) provides that knowingly falsifying or concealing a material fact is a felony which may result in fines and/or up to five (5) years imprisonment.



Now, this does not apply to Don Jr in and of itself. But it DOES apply to Kushner's presence at the meeting, and when you extend it out to Trump Sr knowingly crafting statements to obscure the intent or outcome of the meeting, then you get into Obstruction of Justice.
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
09/07/17 3:02:30 PM
#309
Things such as lying on federal disclosure forms about which foreign agents you met with and why
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
09/07/17 11:51:49 AM
#303
This is all surprisingly relevant considering Don Jr is testifying about it to the Senate this week

https://twitter.com/adamgoldmannyt/status/905814642127196164
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
09/05/17 3:13:29 PM
#261
US intelligence believes Russia was the source, at any rate
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
09/05/17 3:05:40 PM
#259
So the idea is that the US intentionally "leaked" stuff as Guccifer 2.0, and planted things that would appear to be Russian hacking fingerprints in the leaks to frame Russia?
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
09/05/17 2:48:42 PM
#255
So if you're 100% sure Seth Rich was a source purely because of how Assange acts, what's the difference between that and just outright saying it.

IMO, Assange benefits by implying it but not saying it because it allows fools to fill in blanks with their own fanfiction all without saying anything legally false.
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
09/03/17 11:49:12 AM
#247
More Ulti lies as usual
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
09/03/17 9:54:18 AM
#243
collusion
o
l
l
u
s
i
o
n
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
09/01/17 3:10:42 PM
#229
CNN reported that an eclipse happened

FAKE NEWS
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
09/01/17 1:38:21 PM
#227
lordloki12 posted...
Vlado posted...
I like how you countered my common sense observation... You didn't.



What common sense observation?



CNN is fake news, therefore this is fake

If only we had unbiased honest sources like RT
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
09/01/17 10:41:35 AM
#222
The truck was actually just a stylized floatation device. They've been planning this for weeks.
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
09/01/17 9:03:44 AM
#219
Vlado posted...
Did everyone on the filming crew wear sandals? It didn't have to be the reporter who pulled the guy out, if he was ill-equipped.


How large do you think a news crew is?
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 6:42:30 PM
#207
Oh and of course it was fucking InfoWars behind the conspiracy theory
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 6:36:31 PM
#204
Okay so basically the truth is that the khaki shorts man is literally ONLY ON CAMERA when we see the khaki shorts, and every other time you see the red coat, it's the reporter.

I finally understand
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 6:33:05 PM
#203
It's kind of amazing that here we are again in Texas talking about whether there was a second man on a grassy knoll
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 3:01:33 PM
#194
HashtagSEP posted...
Nevermind, it's not worth arguing over something so dumb.



Says the guy in the Vlado Topic!

I still want to try to understand what you see in the video that makes you think it's a different guy. Who knows how long that cut from the reporter walking behind the sign to the actual rescue was. It SEEMS clear to me that the guy on the mic in the beginning is the same guy interviewing the rescued guy right after he's rescued, except he's changed pants and boots.
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 2:51:04 PM
#191
Let's not confuse the issue. If you watch the video its very clearly the same guy.
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 12:20:44 PM
#179
Espeon posted...
...How long does Vlado think it takes to put on a pair of pants?


Without his mom there to help him?
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 11:52:10 AM
#176
LapisLazuli posted...
Vlado, get your life together. This is a sad one even for you.


If Western culture is in real danger, do you care about your own fallacy-addled mind, or do you simply go save it?
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 11:22:45 AM
#173
HashtagSEP posted...
Vlado posted...
If someone is in real danger, do you care about how wet you'll get, or do you simply go save them? This is beyond sad.


You absolutely make sure that you're not just going to put yourself in danger in trying to help them, which something like sandals on a slippery, wet surface would absolutely do.

Like, this is no different than taking your shoes, jacket, etc. off before you jump in the water to save somebody.


If someone is in real danger of drowning, do you care about how wet the anchor on your back will get, or do you simply go save them?
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 11:10:19 AM
#170
Actually what's kind of funny is that the more plausible angle of attack here is that the CNN reporter is such a ninny that he needed to change clothes instead of help someone immediately

But no, that won't do, we have to go all the way to "this entire event was staged."
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 11:08:09 AM
#169
Vlado posted...
If someone is in real danger, do you care about how wet you'll get, or do you simply go save them? This is beyond sad.


I'm starting to doubt you've ever tried to do anything strenuous in the rain

Which would make sense honestly
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 10:33:40 AM
#163
Vlado posted...
Vlado posted...
The reporter is initially in shorts, and then puts on long pants in the period between noticing the car and supposedly pulling the guy out. Making it very obvious that the guy was in no danger, and that the second part of the "rescue" (when the reporter wears long pants) was staged.

This is my statement. Anything you add or try to twist is on you.



"It is obvious that a man in a floating truck is in no danger because the other man had time to change shoes and pants"
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 10:13:27 AM
#156
MoogleKupo141 posted...
please stop doublespeaking me

the picture clearly says this was staged and pictures on the internet can't be wrong


Sandals: the ultimate rescue gear for traction on rain-drenched slopes and for wading into rushing water
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 10:05:59 AM
#154
MoogleKupo141 posted...
is the man driving into the water also staged? Do you think that guy was an actor the whole time, or he just agreed to get back into the truck after CNN slipped him a $20 off camera?


The truck is fine too. The flood is also staged. CGI.
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 10:04:48 AM
#153
When confronted with a man putting on better gear to help save another man, Vlado's Razor says "totaling a nice truck and hiring an actor to risk his life in an attempt to make a reporter look good is the simpler explanation."
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 10:00:59 AM
#151
Vlado posted...
lmao, 1984 doublethink at work. Suuuuuuure, he's in such huge danger that the reporter had time to change clothes before "saving" him. lmao


You saw the truck drive into the water with a man inside, and it started floating.

How do you propose that man got out if not with the help of this news crew
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 9:59:20 AM
#148
I really can't fathom this level of idiocy from the people who genuinely saw this and thought "fake!" because the reporter put on better shoes and pants to go on a soaking wet grassy slope to help pull an elderly man out of his truck window with camera cables as his truck floats down the ravine.
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/31/17 9:51:27 AM
#146
Okay Vlado that's getting pretty offensively dumb of you.

CNN doesn't present the video as if it's a continuous account of the event.

To think that a man is in no danger as he sits in a truck floating down a ravine is asinine.
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/30/17 11:57:07 AM
#128
Dunking on him in his own topics is fun though

I would agree with you if he was disrupting other topics
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/30/17 11:12:56 AM
#124
Because showing a healthy gay couple to children is DANGEROUS

They might start thinking that being gay is ACCEPTABLE
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/30/17 10:55:45 AM
#122
Vlado posted...
UltimaterializerX posted...
Watching the leftists on this board defend open censorship is hilarious.

That's because they are not actual leftists. They are globalists. Globalist fanboys, to be precise.


Sweet, can I buy a George Soros action figure? I can't wait to see Al Gore at next year's GlobalCon!
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/29/17 3:17:15 PM
#87
He's self-censoring his response to the question; the greatest sin!
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/29/17 12:31:40 PM
#81
trdl23 posted...
I'm not even going to post the picture. You guys just chomped on that hook.


At this point, maybe Vlado is baiting YOU to post the picture
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/29/17 12:13:24 PM
#68
Google is not a service of public importance because viable alternatives exist and are equally as accessible
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/29/17 12:10:11 PM
#60
What's the motive anyway?

Why is promoting war in the best interests of Google?

More people searching for how to get out of warzones?
---
TopicGoogle censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Jakyl25
08/29/17 12:06:55 PM
#56
velocycloraptor posted...
Jakyl25 posted...
It doesn't matter if it's the "right thing to do." They're totally within their rights. You are free to seek alternatives. Maybe even find them via Google search!


okay smartmuffin


Outlaw single mothers
---
Board List
Page List: 1 ... 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74