Lurker > Nomadic View

https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/22/us/michigan-man-arrested-cnn-threats/index.html
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Then leave.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Makeveli_lives posted...

In case y'all don't know he just got accused of sexual assault. Still support this?

Yep.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Anyone can go in and edit that shit unless its a high profile page like the Presidents or something. If its something relatively obscure it may take weeks before someone notices the fraudulent material.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Yep.

My dad had a son and a daughter from a previous marriage.

My mother had a son from a previous marriage.

I dont have any full brothers or sisters.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

LethalAffinity posted...

Seeing TYT crash and burn over the past year has been pretty delicious. Cenk is a complete joke.

Who unironically watches them?

I watched it a couple of years ago. I stopped watching when they went full blown SJW.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Fam_Fam posted...

so people who say only money matters just think everyone else is making it up / imagining it?

Absolutely not. I dont deny at all that people may encounter mistreatment for no reason other than their race. While there are also instances where someone was mistreated for a completely unrelated reason, but the victim used race as a justification for it.

Generally people are treated in relation to how they present themselves and based upon their socioeconomic status.

Just to use the most obvious example, Obamas children have many more opportunities and access to success than mine. Thats perfectly understandable and reasonable, he was the president of the United States. That socioeconomic status obviously carries more weight than race ever would. That is the most extreme example, but that same principle is being carried out on a macro scale of all levels of society. Prestige is what matters.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Good
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

boxington posted...

Asperity posted...

zH0mPfR posted...

clearaflagrantj posted...

The people voting that black lives aren't harder would never in a million years swap races.

Get out.

Its true.

he's referencing the movie

So far weve got a cartoon and suspense movie being used as justification. Can we get some nursery rhymes too?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Eddie Brock played by Brock Lesnar.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I dont think thats a big deal. Just sounds like some banter some woo girls would say at a bar.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Sami1000 posted...

Isn't carnage way more powerful than venom??? Why people choose venom over it?

Power wise theyre pretty much the same. Carnage is just more violent and crazy. Kind of like how Joker is incredibly weak as a villain, but his dangerousness is derived by his willingness to be violent and destructive with little rhyme or reason.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

TheGrindery posted...

Nomadic View posted...

BB mofo posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

But by extension you're implying most minorities would choose to be white if they had the choice.

I don't think this is true.

You never saw the White Jesus episode of the Boondocks, have you? Uncle Ruckus is a lot more common than you think.

Also, Black Mormons.

A comedy cartoon is evidence supporting your conclusion?

"Nothing funny or animated can have a valid point. Let's focus on the messenger in an effort to ignore the message!"

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

BB mofo posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

But by extension you're implying most minorities would choose to be white if they had the choice.

I don't think this is true.

You never saw the White Jesus episode of the Boondocks, have you? Uncle Ruckus is a lot more common than you think.

Also, Black Mormons.

A comedy cartoon is evidence supporting your conclusion?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I believe that Cenk isnt racist towards the guy, but its still hilarious to see the nonsense racism victim complex baby that that Cenk nursed, is now being used against him.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Thats idiotic. Theres no reason to arbitrarily lock up items that dont have a significant theft history. Its an unnecessary cost being trust on the stores that serves no purpose other than to appease irrational SJWs.

If haircare products have significant theft history, lock up haircare products. Just not specifically the black ones.

If Walmart has to pay an extra cost to not discriminate, make em pay it. The Walton family is worth over 90 billion dollars, they can take the hit.

Ill agree if all hair products have a high theft rate only black hair products are locked up, sure. But, if only black hair products are being stolen at a high rate, then there is no reason to lock up the others.

You can either lock all of them up or not lock up any of them. That's the price you have to pay to operate as a business in post-segregation society.

No, its not. In fact businesses are doing exactly that in a post-segregation society.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Thats idiotic. Theres no reason to arbitrarily lock up items that dont have a significant theft history. Its an unnecessary cost being trust on the stores that serves no purpose other than to appease irrational SJWs.

If haircare products have significant theft history, lock up haircare products. Just not specifically the black ones.

If Walmart has to pay an extra cost to not discriminate, make em pay it. The Walton family is worth over 90 billion dollars, they can take the hit.

Ill agree if all hair products have a high theft rate only black hair products are locked up, sure. But, if only black hair products are being stolen at a high rate, then there is no reason to lock up the others.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Darklit_Minuet posted...

meestermj posted...

Tgat has nothing to do at all with the situation at hand.
Product A has a high theft rate.
Product B does not.
Solution? Take measures to prevent the theft of Product A.

That's a discriminatory solution in this case because Product A is a product for black people while Product B is a product for white people.

A lot of people argue that black people have higher theft rates than white people and therefore should be banned from stores, but we don't allow that anymore. For that same reason, we shouldn't allow this either. Nobody is saying Walmart can't protect their products, they just have to do it in a way that doesn't discriminate against black people. For the same reason that they can hire an extra security guard but they can't ban black people from their stores

Thats idiotic. Theres no reason to arbitrarily lock up items that dont have a significant theft history. Its an unnecessary cost being thrust on the stores that serves no purpose other than to appease irrational SJWs.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

They were ok for their time, but they were ridiculously silly.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Admits? Is that really something he was accused of?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The view that a racial lens is the best way to see and understand the Trump phenomenon is popular among many of the countrys most esteemed thinkers.


---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

darkjedilink posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Depends on the reasons for locking it up. If its being locked up because the store thinks black people will steal it, yeah, thats kinda racist.

But if there is a history of the product being stolen and the measures are being taken to prevent theft, then no.

It isn't an "if" scenario - it's literally only locked up to prevent theft, because the rates of theft on black hair care products is insane.

Like, actually think about it logically - do you really think a company that penny-pinches to the degree of Walmart would invest the time, money, effort, and manpower to lock that shit up and have a keyholder get it every time someone wants to buy it JUST to fuck with black people? And NOT because they legitimately believe (rightfully so) that it would increase their profit margin by enabling them to control theft on these products?

It's like absolutely nobody on the internet has any fucking idea what it's like to do anything requiring more business savvy than flip a god-damned burger - companies don't do "racist" things unless they're willing to lose a shit-ton of money, or just be a niche business. The largest brick-and-mortar retailer in the fucking world isn't going to invest millions of dollars into loss-prevention measures because racism.

Sounds like youre asking my personal opinion on it. No, I dont think that theyre locked up to fuck with black people. I think theyre locked up because the item has a history of being stolen.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

FrisbeeDude posted...

Nomadic View posted...

White.

[racism].

So, youre claiming racial oppression while simultaneously using race as a factor to dismiss someone?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Thats just simply a lie.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

White.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Depends on the reasons for locking it up. If its being locked up because the store thinks black people will steal it, yeah, thats kinda racist.

But if there is a history of the product being stolen and the measures are being taken to prevent theft, then no.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

FrisbeeDude posted...

Steve Nick posted...

Life isn't harder for black people.

Life is harder for inner city poor people that are growing up in violent places with shit schools and little wealth, which is disproportionately populated by black people.

I don't come from the city, and the black people from my area grew up just like everybody else did.

"The only real color that matters is green!"

Lmao fuck outta here.

Yeah, thats true. A rich black kid has it a lot easier than a poor white kid.

If you want to talk in generalities, yeah, black people have it harder simply because as a whole black families are poorer than white families. But taken on an individual basis then it really just boils down to socioeconomic status.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Cable is a bit archaic. Its jammed full of commercials, yet you still pay out the ass for it.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I was never really into any of them. I would watch Pokmon when I woke up in the morning before school. I had it playing while I was getting ready, but its not something I was obsessed with or cared immensely about.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Turbam posted...

I have a savings account and smart phone

Most people do.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

LightHawKnight posted...

Wouldn't this be more classist instead? Even though I see a lot of poor people with expensive smartphones that they really shouldn't be able to afford, such as iphones.

Yeah, that would be a better argument. I think tacking a is racist tag on everything helps get an issue more attention. However, it chips away at the legitimacy of actual racism and belittles it. Now when something or someone is called racist people tend to roll their eyes and dismiss it before even examining the facts.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Teal and black?! Has Captain Marvel ever wore that?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The president tends to take all credit and responsibility for the good and the bad that happens during his term.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

If I take it off Ill die.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Darkman124 posted...

Nomadic View posted...

UncleBourbon33 posted...

SJWs have hurt the gay cause more than they've helped.

I think this is true.

SJWs are a tiny fraction of LGBT allies, though. most allies have helped quite a lot.

Yeah, they are a tiny fraction, but theyre incredibly vocal. Pushing things like prepubertal sex change surgery and divulging in delusions with people suffering from gender dysphoria are pushing people away from modern LBGT.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

UncleBourbon33 posted...

SJWs have hurt the gay cause more than they've helped.

I think this is true.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Lordgold666 posted...

Why cant ppl get a checking account?

Nothing is stopping them. Ive never met a black person that lives the way this narrator, and many people on the left in general, describes black people.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I didnt like that Batman....wasnt Batman. He used guns, he tried to kill Superman, and he branded people with hot iron. He sounds more like a Batman villain.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Its Rockstar. Im not worried about it.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I agree.

Were getting too old to have text that small. At least give an option for larger font.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I doubt it. Even on our own planet some of the highest intelligent animals, dolphins, elephants, and octopuses, are all immensely different from each either in appearance.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Nomadique
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

You are not prepared!
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

No
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Teal deer: The narrator states that black people dont own smart phones or have checking accounts, so this type of shopping is racist.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>