Lurker > Laserion

Restaurants should have an "incoming" closing time, close the "in" doors, and plan for more time to tend to guests already inside.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

How does throwing poop at a restaurant make America great again?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

How could they lose to the more expensive one? Is the other one that much nicer?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Work related?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

This topic is so hobbyist!
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Cpt_Pineapple posted...

what if a black cop showed up?

The "cop" is in league with the "firefighter", obviously.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Vets can prescribe a pill to make you stop eating poop.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

KINDERFELD posted...

Laserion posted...

KINDERFELD posted...

The type of thinking that says a woman should be able to slap a man but he should not hit her back because he is a male and stronger etc.

Is it OK to block/parry/divert/dodge, though? Or do you HAVE to take the hit?

As long as you're willing to do the same if it were a man.

I agree. Whenever it is in your power to defend yourself without having to hurt the other, you should strive for that.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Wife, yesterday morning.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

The quickest way to get modded isn't to post porn

because more people watch those instead of marking them.

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

KINDERFELD posted...

The type of thinking that says a woman should be able to slap a man but he should not hit her back because he is a male and stronger etc.

Is it OK to block/parry/divert/dodge, though? Or do you HAVE to take the hit?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

I'm married, 10 years.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Duncanwii posted...

Wedsday

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

brandunh11 posted...

Are you blind? Its determined by both

This. The features of the new person are different from those of the white parent, but they are different from the non-white parent. They're in-between, a fusion.
Or maybe:YOUHAVENOHOPE posted...

because white people think if there's anything mixed then it's not-white

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

I don't think all of those just want people to kill themselves. Just to make less of us until we disappear eventually. At least that's what vhemt says.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

75-76 during the day, 71 for sleeping. 78 when we're away.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Yesterday, when I chopped off a small tree growing in between my fence and the neighbors'. It has to go for the new fence.
Today is chopping the rest and roots.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Vicious_Dios posted...

Just rig them with traps.

Not so fast! You've activated my trap card!
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Use a longer chain or cord, and tie it all up with that.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

ProtoManSPx posted...

Patchwork
darkprince45

@BlackSky09
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

US would have concession stands/kiosks along the way.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Harpie posted...

@TooLateToGoBack posted...

lol at all the zero votes. Enjoy having some nurse take care of your ancient ass when you're old and alone.

Oh, so none of those people in old folk homes have children?

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

cjsdowg posted...

legendarylemur posted...

Another thing that I'll keep short, had a guy under my supervision. An absolute idiot, didn't go to college. Couldn't f***ing learn how to do his job. I had to write down like a list of s*** for him to follow word for word or we weren't gonna get anywhere. Next thing I know, he takes out his favorite knife and starts like slashing it around and stabbing it into the air. I was like pretty close by, and was like "what the f*** are you doing?!"

What was he doing ? I would really like to know reason he gave for doing that .

My guess:
He was playing. Like a kid with his toy sword, except this blade was sharp for real.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

*reads only topic title*
It's not. Anyone who insults people because of their race (any race) is a racially prejudiced bigot.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

What if they want bio-kids?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

So you are a bailiff?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Did you do it while using that chart?
That chart is by income. Your statement is by smarts.
You were equating "poor" with "dumb".
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

DrizztLink posted...

NES4EVER posted...

Did you report it lost and suspend it?

I tried, but my penis just bought a boat in Ecuador.

So you sailed boat to harbor...
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

You don't know how to use contractions, so don't use them.
Use "is" and "has" instead.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

kingdrake2 posted...

the word was "puter" change the e to an a and remove the r.

That means "whore".
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

I read this as "phones in concrete" and wanted to see what that was about.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

When you are speaking to someone about themselves, it is normal to use the pronoun "you". Or are there male "you", female "you" and other 71 "you" variations now?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Talk and catch up?
Cards and table games?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

I have knuxnole tagged as [Casual easy mode] for a topic he made on a gaming board. It applies to all his life as well.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

pinky0926 posted...

When people are talking about hobbies in that sense they usually mean some kind of craft or exercise, not just existing in an entertaining way.

This. Let's make a distinction between just a "pastime" and an actual "hobby".
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

The screen is just a small rectangle in front of you. Those parts that you say are visible fall out if this rectangle, in your peripheral vision.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Most plurals are made by just adding "s" or "es". What is this apostrophe shit you used here?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Kazi1212 posted...

The same people you interact with in real life are the same people you interact with in the internet

This. It's just that in real life, people hide their jerkness, because they don't want to be punched in the face.
Also, hi, Holden!
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

*affected
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Sean Connery should play Cidolfas Orlandu some time.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

John Shooter
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

I read "gsw" as "gun shot wound" rather than "gee es doblyu". It's actually shorter.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Isn't the manji in the opposite direction?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

It would be dumber to not ask, and then do something wrong.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Didn't know she would do something like "Knock Knock" when she was in "El Internado".
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

What is "my fancy" really, and how do you tickle it?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Sting posted...

Caught her with a group of guys at our hotel... all I will say

Being passed around like a bong?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Muffinz0rz posted...

Too bad you can't put it on your resume

"Can deal with difficult people"
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".