Lurker > OhhhJa

GasMonkey posted...

OhhhJa posted...

Oops_All_Berrys posted...

OhhhJa posted...

Orange man bad

Libs defeated

Orange man bad! Mushroom weenie hahaha lmao! Tiny hands LOL

are following a script, this reminds me of those computer controlled characters in games.

they're mocking 'npcs', a term used to describe people who criticize trump using the same few key terms

OhhhJa posted...

Orange man bad

Libs defeated

OhhhJa posted...

There are ways to crack down on illegal immigration that are far more practical than a wall

Landmines.

you see @EvilMegas, im guessing youre the sort of person who is for "common sense gun control"

good bet youre also the sort of "common" person referred to here who knows absolutely nothing about guns and therefore has no sense about them. that is exactly the sort of person who should have nothing to do with the decision on what weapons a person is or is not allowed to own.

looks like someone's alt finally hit 2 months

I expected a puppet and got a pupper, I feel so violated.

SmokeMassTree posted...

That's an ad for nest

Why would nest advertise that their security systems are flawed?

wow so surprising that a successful actress would be a democrat

Yellow posted...

Don't give them a reason to talk shit about you.

Just take what they were saying about you and stop doing that.

It depends on if he can. If its something like height or something he cant change, then he cant really stop doing, nor can he change it. Well, not without a lot of money, I think...

Address it politely and directly like a respectful adult

Don't be a terrible coworker.

DrCidd posted...

185 lbs?

Looks more like 250-300 lbs

No I know a girl who looks about that big and only weighed 180.

It's funny seeing white people cry about racism dont you get taught as children dont dish it out if you can't take it

they used a White model with blue eyes and very blonde hair

Unlocked everyone in smash so I can stop playing it. Jesus, you'd think at the very bottom of online there'd be normal people, but no, even at fucking 30,000 GSP I get fucking dumpstered. Fuck smash.

OhhhJa posted...

streamofthesky posted...

lol, only 5 out of the 10 pictures even have both hands on the wheel (one hand honking the horn doesn't count), and one of them is no hands...

WTF is this? Do people really drive with these stupid hand positions? That's fucking dangerous

Closest for me is #4, though my hands are a bit lower on the wheel than that. Not quite "9 and 3" as opposed to "10 and 2" but, yeah...

I've been driving as 2 for 14 years and have never had a single accident and have actively avoided idiots trying to crash into me

If you drive better when you don't even have hands on the steering wheel, that says more about your driving skills (or lack thereof) than the "merits" of no-hands driving

OhhhJa posted...

Idk why do your parents consider you a failure?

Dang buddy. Do you know his parents?

lol, only 5 out of the 10 pictures even have both hands on the wheel (one hand honking the horn doesn't count), and one of them is no hands...

WTF is this? Do people really drive with these stupid hand positions? That's fucking dangerous

Closest for me is #4, though my hands are a bit lower on the wheel than that. Not quite "9 and 3" as opposed to "10 and 2" but, yeah...

I think I've spoken enough of my own opinions. It was an okay enough debate but I think I'm done. We won't get anywhere, so agree to disagree. This topic is 90% just us talking about it anyway...

OhhhJa posted...

Flappers posted...

OhhhJa posted...

Call it tin foil hat if you'd like but there's no denying the increasingly rapid advancement of A.I. in the past decade and theres no reason to think it's going to come to a halt. A.I. and computers in general are modeled directly after our brains. I see no real reason to believe that we cant eventually program A.I. to learn and create. They already do that to some extent

Didn't I say that there's no denying how we have made remarkable things? I suppose I could see an AI of such capacity being possible in the future... But again, that's not the question -- the question is if you think it will ever threaten humanity, which I don't think it will.

I think it's possible but we'll have to wait and see. If we get to the point where A.I. are that advanced, then someone will inevitably weaponize it. Someone creating malicious A.I. seems pretty inevitable if we get to that point

Through the usage of a twisted human weaponizing it, then I could see that. But the AI deciding on its own to overthrow humanity? Pure science fiction.

OhhhJa posted...

Call it tin foil hat if you'd like but there's no denying the increasingly rapid advancement of A.I. in the past decade and theres no reason to think it's going to come to a halt. A.I. and computers in general are modeled directly after our brains. I see no real reason to believe that we cant eventually program A.I. to learn and create. They already do that to some extent

Didn't I say that there's no denying how we have made remarkable things? I suppose I could see an AI of such capacity being possible in the future... But again, that's not the question -- the question is if you think it will ever threaten humanity, which I don't think it will.

OhhhJa posted...

Flappers posted...

Yellow posted...

Flappers posted...

AI will never become smart enough to threaten us. In order for that to happen, we first have to build an AI capable of doing so -- and we are not smart enough to do that.

You just have to set up the framework and let machine learning do the rest. You basically have to define it's goals, its goal being a hardwired inclination to fit in with humanity.

Take engaging with a person with eye contact. You hard wire a natural ability to calculate what a pair of eyes are looking at and give it the red flag that they're looking at you, then they sort out what that means by observing social interaction.

I've seen most attempts at ai and I can say I've yet to see all of our technology put together. Neural networks are a new technology.

By definition, a machine can only do what it is programmed to do. It cannot "learn and grow" beyond the capacities of what we want it to do or what it is made to do. It would take a Godlike ability to manufacture a machine that essentially functions as a human mind, and if hypothetically we had the ability to do so, we would be smart enough to also create a preventative to it ever going wrong.
I'm honestly surprised by how many people believe AI can and will take us over. It's easy to be dazzled by our advancing technologies and perfectly human to imagine how impressively it will improve, but people have always thought this way. Keep in mind, back in the 1980s they thought we'd have flying cars and self-lacing shoes by now. "AI will enslave us" is the modern day equivalence of that absurdity, and nothing more.

I think you're extremely naive/uneducated about A.I. we already have machines that can do many things better than we can. And we actually do have flying cars. It just turns out they arent extremely practical compared to regular cars

Sure, there's no denying we have created truly remarkable things, and I certainly am no expert. That's not the question, though. Do you really think that artificial intelligence will ever truly threaten humanity? Agree to disagree if you do, but in my opinion this is near tinfoil-hat levels of thinking. It makes good movie and comic book ideas, but I don't think it's possible. Although I will say I can see why people can believe it. I myself just don't look at such inventions and think "this will be the end of us".
As a vague notion and conversation piece, okay -- but as a serious belief? Now, that's just silly...

I'd say finding alien life is more likely. Although I don't think it'll be the advanced life-form UFO alien that we think it to be. I think if it's possible for life to exist on other planets, then it will, but it will be basic and evolving. There's a whole universe out there, it's hard to believe that in its vastness, our Earth is the only thing that houses biological life.
Microscopic life on other planets seems like such a fascinating concept to me...

Yellow posted...

Flappers posted...

AI will never become smart enough to threaten us. In order for that to happen, we first have to build an AI capable of doing so -- and we are not smart enough to do that.

You just have to set up the framework and let machine learning do the rest. You basically have to define it's goals, its goal being a hardwired inclination to fit in with humanity.

Take engaging with a person with eye contact. You hard wire a natural ability to calculate what a pair of eyes are looking at and give it the red flag that they're looking at you, then they sort out what that means by observing social interaction.

I've seen most attempts at ai and I can say I've yet to see all of our technology put together. Neural networks are a new technology.

By definition, a machine can only do what it is programmed to do. It cannot "learn and grow" beyond the capacities of what we want it to do or what it is made to do. It would take a Godlike ability to manufacture a machine that essentially functions as a human mind, and if hypothetically we had the ability to do so, we would be smart enough to also create a preventative to it ever going wrong.
I'm honestly surprised by how many people believe AI can and will take us over. It's easy to be dazzled by our advancing technologies and perfectly human to imagine how impressively it will improve, but people have always thought this way. Keep in mind, back in the 1980s they thought we'd have flying cars and self-lacing shoes by now. "AI will enslave us" is the modern day equivalence of that absurdity, and nothing more.

green dragon posted...

Dang, sorry to hear that, dude.

Have you ever tried to get better at something?

Yeah I've tried a few things, but not been good at any of 'em

guy12345 posted...

I'm 40, so that ship has sailed

Just like the movie 40 year old virgin, it can still happen.

what if he was talking about video game consoles?

If you're using your blood to impregnate somebody, you might be doing something wrong.