Lurker > Corrik7

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Board List
Page List: 1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 115
TopicTop 35 Stories in Fiction
Corrik7
11/19/19 10:48:55 AM
#368
What's a manhwa

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/19/19 10:43:47 AM
#437
HeroDelTiempo17 posted...
But we've also seen that these immigration policies can't be squared with what's legal. Off the top of my head, children get detained illegally if you follow this rule and Trump wanted an asylum policy that violated asylum laws. Does following the law justify breaking more laws, specifically ones designed to protect people's rights?
What people's rights? Our government's only purpose is to protect American Citizens and their rights.

The rights of those who wish to break our laws and illegally enter our country ultimately matter little beyond our government maintaining legitimacy in its purpose and its image. All we owe those who wish to break our laws that are not citizens is humane as possible deportation.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicChick-fil-A ending all donations to Anti-LGBT groups.
Corrik7
11/19/19 9:13:22 AM
#14
Lol Salvation Army is Anti-LGBT haha.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/19/19 9:08:13 AM
#427
Peace___Frog posted...
Sometimes it's really refreshing to check in and see these mental gymnastics.

Yep, every person stopped for drunk driving in PA gets exactly the same treatment that you did, in a fair and equitable manner, pursuant to the laws that prohibit driving drunk. No one has gotten out of a speeding ticket ever. The police handle everything to the letter of the law, always.
You are stating that there is discretion in sentencing. But, there are mandatory minimums which must be abided by. They cannot be superseded when found guilty of said DUI charge in PA.

A cop not doing his job and ticketing someone for speeding has nothing to do with laws.

Tell me where a law says if a male cop pulls over an attractive female he can be more apt to let her go with a warning?

Like, lmfao.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/19/19 8:51:53 AM
#424
kevwaffles posted...
Well setting aside that you chose something that is usually prosecuted on the state level because it was the most extreme example you could conjure up in two seconds, you're talking about far more explicit laws in this case. Most laws do not have enforcement guidelines as clearly spelled out as literal murder.

Also you should really stop claiming political bias when you're taking Jeff Sessions words from 2 years ago as your personal gospel.
Everyone in the world knows Trump has changed no laws in regards to immigration in this question. He is just actually enforcing it.

Peace___Frog posted...
It's against the law to drink and drive, but obviously that gets enforced differently around the country huh
Gets enforced how it's laws state. Just like Trump is enforcing our immigration the way it states.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/19/19 8:28:06 AM
#420
It is against the law to murder.

Obama says it is against the law but we will only prosecute those who murdered children.

Trump says no it is against the law to murder we will prosecute everyone who commits murder like the law says.

Enforcing the laws that exist and not selectively enforcing them.

This really isn't even complicated. Holy political bias lmfao.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/19/19 7:38:03 AM
#416
kevwaffles posted...
And yet your strategy seems to be just that every time this subject comes up.
Nope. Already showed you that this was always how it was. Not my fault durrrr Republicans are the worst blinds you. It is right there in the article. He is enforcing the law as it is supposed to be, not selectively enforcing it. Black and White. Not even debatable.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/19/19 7:22:09 AM
#414
TheRock1525 posted...
Yes wrong.

Please stop.
Saying it over and over doesn't make you correct.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicGoogle Stadia Review Zone
Corrik7
11/19/19 7:21:25 AM
#17
GildedFool posted...
I think at that point it's a different technology.
Nah they got it all figured out alrdy.

https://www.engadget.com/2019/10/10/google-stadia-negative-latency/

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicWhere is the black Friday topic
Corrik7
11/19/19 6:40:36 AM
#16
I'll post the spreadsheet once GameStop lists, but I need a computer monitor. Preferably 32 inch VA. 5 ms response. 1440p/144 or 4k/60fps.

If anyone has any recommendations / sees something let me know.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicGoogle Stadia Review Zone
Corrik7
11/19/19 6:37:22 AM
#15
It will have negative latency in the near future once it programs your thought process.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicTexas Girl QUITS her JOB after 1 DAY after she said the N-WORD for FREE SPEECH!.
Corrik7
11/19/19 6:35:06 AM
#3
That is one way to throw away probably 100/200+k in tuition.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/19/19 6:32:14 AM
#412
Not wrong. Been pointed out since day 1 regarding it. Obama didn't want to look bad so he didn't want to enforce separations but that is how it is supposed to be enforced.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/19/19 1:38:50 AM
#409
xp1337 posted...
I see LotM got to it first, but this has been repeatedly debunked as BS.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2018/06/19/the-facts-about-trumps-policy-of-separating-families-at-the-border/

No law or court ruling mandates they separate families. In fact, prior to implementing zero tolerance, they released over 100,000 immigrants:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/immigration/despite-vow-to-end-catch-and-release-trump-has-freed-100000-who-illegally-crossed-the-border/2018/04/13/839c778e-3754-11e8-acd5-35eac230e514_story.html

Indeed, at that time the administration claimed that "The Trump administration has its hands tied" by the law (specifically a 2008 law and the 1997 Flores settlement) and had no choice but to release them.

spoiler alert: the law didn't change between that point and the implementation of zero tolerance.

And now they claim those very same laws and rulings are the ones that are forcing them to separate families when they previously claimed those were the laws and rulings that forced them to release them!

Under Obama, DHS was instructed to prioritize dangerous criminals, gang members, and national security threats. Trump rolled back that instruction and instead instructed DHS to refer all of them to DOJ. So now instead of focusing on serious felonies, DOJ was told to prosecute for misdemeanors (which Illegal entry is) and not prioritize felons.

As SCOTUS has stated, "In our criminal justice system, the government retains 'broad dscretion' as to whom to prosecute." The Trump administration made the conscious choice to change the Obama/Bush-era policy of sending non-serious-threats to the civil courts to be processed and instead criminally prosecute them which directly leads to family separation. That's a SCOTUS-recognized discretionary power they're exercising.

As for the BS "Obama did it too!" family separation under Obama and Bush 43 was done when there was suspicion of human trafficking or threat to the child. That's a hell of a lot different from doing it to everyone.

We can criticize Obama for how he handled immigration policy, god knows it was done on the left during his administration - not that conservatives seem to be aware of this - but this talking point angle for it is straight BS.


Read your own source.

"Immigrant families are being separated primarily because the Trump administration in April began to prosecute as many border-crossing offenses as possible. This zero-tolerance policy applies to all adults, regardless of whether they cross alone or with their children.
The Justice Department cant prosecute children along with their parents, so the natural result of the zero-tolerance policy has been a sharp rise in family separations. Nearly 2,000 immigrant children were separated from parents during six weeks in April and May, according to the Department of Homeland Security."

Now read your own words.

"Under Obama, DHS was instructed to prioritize dangerous criminals, gang members, and national security threats. Trump rolled back that instruction and instead instructed DHS to refer all of them to DOJ. So now instead of focusing on serious felonies, DOJ was told to prosecute for misdemeanors (which Illegal entry is) and not prioritize felons."

Obama was selectively enforcing the law. Trump is enforcing it completely.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/18/19 11:30:47 PM
#405
Nelson_Mandela posted...
I didn't say Obama did it more often. But he certainly did it.
Also, Trump didn't "change policy". He started actually enforcing the policy as it was.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicNFL Discussion Topic - Week 11
Corrik7
11/18/19 1:27:16 PM
#139
And now Gronkowski is back for the pats. Lol

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/18/19 11:27:46 AM
#329
Not sure if true but Facebook is circulating someone who is supposedly the whistle blower.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicI hardly play PS4 ever... But... I got just got PS Plus for 4 years for $100
Corrik7
11/18/19 9:36:19 AM
#12
MZero11 posted...
Well yeah but the webs are usually dead around that time so I don't browse much >_>
I just happened to see it when I sat down at work.

Then amazon wouldn't accept my cards without inputting the numbers fully to verify the account which fucked me out of 5% cash back and cost me like 10 mins.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicI hardly play PS4 ever... But... I got just got PS Plus for 4 years for $100
Corrik7
11/18/19 9:33:08 AM
#10
guffguy89 posted...
I feel like this was more of a flex than a tip.
It could be both I suppose.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicI hardly play PS4 ever... But... I got just got PS Plus for 4 years for $100
Corrik7
11/18/19 8:31:47 AM
#8
MZero11 posted...
I'll give you $60 for two of those codes

you're making $10 profit!
You really have no excuse for not being online to hit up the sale, Mzero! Lol. 4am to 6:30am EST is like your evening isn't it.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicI hardly play PS4 ever... But... I got just got PS Plus for 4 years for $100
Corrik7
11/18/19 7:49:59 AM
#6
metaIslug posted...
Discounted rip-off
?

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicI hardly play PS4 ever... But... I got just got PS Plus for 4 years for $100
Corrik7
11/18/19 6:55:31 AM
#4
Yeah you had about 15 minutes from my post to get in on it still.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicI hardly play PS4 ever... But... I got just got PS Plus for 4 years for $100
Corrik7
11/18/19 6:22:20 AM
#2
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004RMK5QG/

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicI hardly play PS4 ever... But... I got just got PS Plus for 4 years for $100
Corrik7
11/18/19 6:21:54 AM
#1
Amazon has PS Plus for $25 a year right now. So I purchased 4. In before Sony gets rid of PS Plus.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicNFL Discussion Topic - Week 11
Corrik7
11/17/19 5:47:02 PM
#115
GranzonEx posted...
I fucking told you guys the Pats are frauds


Nelson_Mandela posted...
Shocking that the pats haven't been playing well when they face the first decent teams of the season
These posts will age well.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
Topicmaking the jump from chrome to firefox
Corrik7
11/17/19 4:50:51 PM
#8
I use Firefox for PC and Chrome for Mobile.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicEndless Shrimp ends TODAY
Corrik7
11/17/19 4:49:36 PM
#6
Jesus this toilet is taking a beating right now.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicEndless Shrimp ends TODAY
Corrik7
11/17/19 3:52:28 PM
#1
And I am there to celebrate it!

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicColin Kapernick wore a 'Kunta Kinte' t-shirt to his NFL workout yesterday
Corrik7
11/17/19 1:11:43 PM
#92
cjs28 posted...
What's kunta kinte?
In roots his slave name was Toby and he sheds it for his real name kinte.

Basically, wearing the shirt was supposed to clearly make it known he felt he was a slave to the NFL and the NFL slave owners and he was breaking free with his own name despite their demands.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/17/19 5:50:43 AM
#263
Suprak the Stud posted...
I got a big negative on the Muslim one as well. That one is also tremendously disappointing, and the only reason I didn't mention it was because of how utterly shocking the Trump one was.

I still can't believe the number on that one. You don't think he has flaws?
To be fair, it isn't a regulated quiz. Anyone can take it as a republican or vice versa.

I agreed with every republican question. Only 2 weren't agreed with by a majority, the flaws and climate change one. I can't see thinking anyone doesn't have flaws, and while I don't readily believe climate change is a man made issue, I think it would be stupid not to observe and analyze and worry about it some.


---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/17/19 5:47:49 AM
#262
Suprak the Stud posted...
lol I was also completely off on "Donald Trump is a flawed person". I had that at 90% because I would literally agree to that statement for every politician in the history of ever. What kind of lunatic doesn't see just about anyone as a "flawed" person. Not bad or evil or sinister, but just "flawed". That one absolutely blew my mind.
Yeah, I don't understand that one. Everyone is flawed no matter how good they are.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/16/19 9:57:10 PM
#239
Ashethan posted...
Your perception gap: -1%

On average, Democrats have a perception gap of 19%
and Independents have a gap of 13% when assessing Republicans

I was WAY too generous on Donald Trump being a flawed person, though.
I put 100% for Democrats in regards to their country. That was my one that was the most off I think lol.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/16/19 9:17:51 PM
#236
Your perception gap: 11%
On average, Republicans have a perception gap of 27%
and Independents have a gap of 20% when assessing Democrats

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2019/11/opinions/fractured-states-perception-gap/


---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicNFL Discussion Topic - Week 11
Corrik7
11/16/19 7:59:27 PM
#64
In surprising news, the Kaepernick workout was made a media circus by Kaep, and 2/3rds of the teams didn't show to his new location on an hour's notice workout.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicTrdl's Top 25 Video Game Bosses - Predix Topic
Corrik7
11/16/19 4:56:52 PM
#38
Snake5555555555 posted...
Gave it my best shot.

1. Fujiwara no Mokou (Imperishable Night)
2. Nidhogg (Final Fantasy XIV)
3. ASGORE (Undertale)
4. Illidan Stormrage (World of Warcraft)
5. Liquid Ocelot (Metal Gear Solid 4)
6. Beatrix (Final Fantasy IX)
7. The End (Metal Gear Solid 3)
8. Yukari Yakumo (Perfect Cherry Blossom)
9. The Boss (Metal Gear Solid 3)
10. RinRin (MadWorld)
11. Vergil (Devil May Cry 3)
12. Shadow Rise (Persona 4)
13. Bad Girl (No More Heroes)
14. Oerlich (Pyre)
15. Giovanni (Pokemon Red/Blue)
16. Maximilian (Valkyria Chronicles)
17. Jasmine (Pokemon Gold/Silver)
18. The Dullahan (Golden Sun: The Lost Age)
19. Zero Two (Kirby 64: The Crystal Shards)
20. Photoshop Flowey (Undertale)
21. Yunalesca (Final Fantasy X)
22. The Spine (Transistor)
23. Nyx (Persona 3)
24. Great Grey Wolf Sif (Dark Souls)
25. Direseeker (Risk of Rain)
It's definitely the Lich King and not Illidan.

I see he later made this obvious with more info.


---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/16/19 4:06:44 PM
#228
Pardons are removing the legal system from the equation. They by definition destroy the rule of law by being used. They probably shouldn't actually exist at all, so we can't really complain at their usage not being how we wish it to be used with the power being granted to it being allowed.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/16/19 2:46:02 PM
#225
LordoftheMorons posted...
Just as how Trump firing Mueller would have been obstruction of justice, using the pardon in a corrupt way is impeachable.

Do you think the following are unimpeachable?

  1. Trump sells pardons for a million bucks each
  2. Trump suggests that maybe something should happen to his political opponents, and then pardons someone who assassinates one of them.
  3. Trump commits crimes and then pardons himself
When abused, the pardon power destroys the rule of law.
The pardon power destroys the rule of law no matter how it is used.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/16/19 1:40:31 PM
#223
TopicTrump: I don't give a shit about Ukraine I want dirt on Biden
Corrik7
11/16/19 11:41:29 AM
#72
Heineken14 posted...
That call isn't why people are saying soundland committed perjury. That was before we even found out about the call between he and Donnie.
I am responding to the person who says Sondland perjured because the one guy says he overheard a phone call.

Unless said phone call transcripts can confirm that or corroborating witnesses, it is hearsay. It is word against word. It doesn't equate to perjury.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicTrump: I don't give a shit about Ukraine I want dirt on Biden
Corrik7
11/16/19 11:01:12 AM
#63
Bullet_Wing posted...
This isn't hearsay. This guy literally heard Trump talking to Sondland. Your gaslighting fails.
This is called hearsay. He says he heard it. Unless evidence exists this was said then it is hearsay.

For example, people in this topic said that testimony means Sondland perjured himself.

Except... It is Sondland's word versus that guys in the scenario. Maybe it is the guy saying Sondland said this that is perjuring. Or maybe there is a discrepancy where both are right but think the other is wrong. Etc.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicI really hate how Daniel is the bully in Karate Kid (spoilers)
Corrik7
11/16/19 9:55:53 AM
#26
gloBal enemy posted...
Binge watched to finish episode 9 today with the wife (she wanted to watch so we started from the beginning).

It's actually really good. I love how it intertwined so well with things from the old movie.
Yeah, season 2 is just as good too.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
Corrik7
11/16/19 8:07:26 AM
#222
LordoftheMorons posted...
If he pardons Stone or Manafort thats another article of impeachment
It's not. He can pardon whoever he wants to.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicNFL Discussion Topic - Week 11
Corrik7
11/15/19 7:52:15 PM
#56
Maybe he did

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicNFL Discussion Topic - Week 11
Corrik7
11/15/19 4:30:34 PM
#49
BlueCrystalTear posted...
Rudolph should be fined for misconduct. Garrett should be arrested and banned for life. That was Burfict levels of thuggery. It was the worst fight I've ever seen in football, though it most definitely wasn't Malice at the Palace level, but that was because there weren't drunk fans at point-blank range to provoke someone like Metta World Peace.

I'm just reading recaps and watching clips but that was something else.
How was rasheed Wallace there and he was basically an angel lol.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicHave you ever successfully talked your way out of a speeding ticket?
Corrik7
11/15/19 12:46:40 PM
#7
I got a warning once, but I don't feel I successfully talked my way out of it. Lol.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicNFL Discussion Topic - Week 11
Corrik7
11/15/19 12:35:19 PM
#43
Aecioo posted...
Nothing will ever top Malice at the Palace (involving the athletes, at least) until someone brings out a gun.

Just the craziest thing ever.
Apparently Hockey has had similar incidents in their storied past.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicNFL Discussion Topic - Week 11
Corrik7
11/15/19 12:33:56 PM
#42
Emeraldegg posted...
I have no problem with this, I do have a problem with rudolph not getting anything
While Garret initiated it with the late hit, which albeit maybe he did not know the ball was out, Rudolph escalated it by going for Garrett's helmet and trying to pull it off on the ground.

Garret just took it 500 levels further.

So, I agree with you.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicOh hey i'm being sued
Corrik7
11/15/19 12:30:21 PM
#214
Uglyface2 posted...
Debt collectors arent major companies, usually. Theyre a relatively small operation with a call center.
Correct. The initial debt is the major company.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicFortnite X Star Wars
Corrik7
11/15/19 10:05:39 AM
#1
An Imperial Star Destroyer has entered the atmosphere. Stormtroopers have landed on the planet. Get ready to rumble!


---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
TopicI really hate how Daniel is the bully in Karate Kid (spoilers)
Corrik7
11/15/19 9:36:06 AM
#22
gloBal enemy posted...
Just watched episode 1 and some of 2... I like it already.
I tried watching an episode or 2. Ended up watching all of season 1. It's very good.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik
Currently playing: Division 2
Board List
Page List: 1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 115