Lurker > Nrrr

it's interesting how reactionary the typical gamer is given the constant complains about the practices of game companies. absolute bootlickers. but hey, thats america!

1) People have been throwing out the theory that Hooded Justice is Will, but he was replaced by a white guy when they formed a superhero group, to showcase how white america steals black culture and markets it as their own. There was also material found that says
From reddit: "
"The opening scene of episode 1 is Will is watching a silent movie where the main character(Bass Reeves) is chasing down a white criminal and putting him to justice. Bass Reeves in real life was a black US Marshall who acted as the inspiration for the Lone Ranger a white hero. Whereas Bass Reeves was a black hero, who was turned white to appease larger audiences, it's only poetic that Hooded Justice an originally black hero, is unknowingly turned into a white hero in the American Hero Story tv show within the movie." There is also this bit of info from the Watchmen wiki:

"The author's notes reveal that this costume was originally designed for a Minuteman called Brother Night who claimed to have occult powers.", this would obviously tie into Sister Night.

don't really have anything to add to the other points.

blitzball teams

---

I'm baby

no, that sounds uninteresting to me and I would prefer the disney corporation be destroyed completely

---

I'm baby

https://imgur.com/O5rjLpV

---

I'm baby

https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1187533472463765504?s=21

looks like it might get reduced or waived, but yeah...not great.

---

I'm baby

https://twitter.com/KrisHansonRCF/status/1187389863068233728 suns looking nice

---

I'm baby

Biggs
Wedge
General Leo
Banon

---

I'm baby

Suns look legit, but they won big in the first game last year. They definitely seem way better than last year though.

---

I'm baby

ShatteredElysium posted...

But as a caveat to that, it depends how healthy you remain. Having depth allows you to put less stress on players over the season and less of a drop off if someone is injured for the playoffs

If AD or Lebron goes down for an extended period the Lakers are fucked. If Kawhi or George miss time for the Clippers, it's less of an issue. And theoretically Clippers should have better load management through the season. We saw how good Kawhi was last season in the playoffs

this is seriously important...like, Suns fans here can attest that playing Troy Daniels and Jared Dudley is absolutely not going to get you far.

---

I'm baby

I am certain I have talked up Opera before, you should stalk my posts better

---

I'm baby

Okay, I am definitely starting to understand why centrists in this topic always misunderstand me. They have the reading comprehension of a goat, the memory of a goldfish, and skip all of my posts that are longer than a sentence or two. I always wonder why nobody ever replies to the ones I actually put effort into!

And I am referring to the fact that you constantly post shit like "uh oh the lunatic conspiracy theory people are around!!!", Tony even called you out on it. It is especially annoying since quite literally none of you guys responded to my post explaining the hypocrisy of referring to me as a conspiracy theorist while defending hillary clinton here. I'm just going to stop posting in these topics, its completely a waste of time when I just get told I am crazy 50 times a day by people who have such little comprehension of my posts they often hate them for things I wasn't even saying.

---

I'm baby

red13n posted...

Also you came in basically saying we were deranged and brainwashed.

At that point, when you have that view, its pretty much pointless to argue with you.

I said that after several days of arguing with brick walls like you who just responded to my post with "lol here comes the lunatics" so please don't act like I cast the first crazy stone.

---

I'm baby

red13n posted...

Russia in all likelihood pays people like Vlado.

ah yes, i am the conspiracy theorist here

---

I'm baby

I swear to god you people are brick walls. You think fake news is a huge concern because the establishment media would rather explain the appeal of Bernie Sanders, Tulsi Gabbard, and Donald Trump as being all because of outside forces, rather than understanding why these figures actually appeal to their fans, which is that they are saying different things and offering different perspectives than you can typically find on the establishment media and from establishment politicians. Yes, Russia does run intelligence operations on the US public to cause chaos and disrupt the established order. Literally nobody has disputed this. I don't think that calling out individual politicians you think are being boosted completely without being part of it themselves by any indications serves a purpose of going after fake news - attack RT, attack Trumps legitimately concerning business/mafia connections to Russia, whatever. But to lump in Bernie Sanders and Tulsi Gabbard serves one purpose- to undermine them politically, and unfairly. And if the real issue is concern with fake news and Russian interference, and you are really DEEPLY concerned about stopping it- why are we witch hunting instead of talking about REAL solutions like Ranked Choice Voting, which removes the possibility of spoiler candidacies and allows a much more fair system of elections? That is a tangible way to address this concern, but that isn't what Hillary Clinton is saying we should do, she is attacking a Democrat with completely baseless speculation and starting a witch hunt.

---

I'm baby

I don't know why you bothered responding to me either, you said nothing besides a lie that you are not a centrist. In fact, you never respond to anything with anything constructive or challenging whatsoever. All of your replies are basically saying "lol this person does not have the exact same opinion as me"

---

I'm baby

Hillary Clinton is literally the one who started this all by throwing out a conspiracy theory and you are too deranged to understand that. The centrists in this topic are seeming more and more like raging McCarthy madmen whose entire grip on reality is lost.

You guys love to post shit like "OF COURSE MOSCOW TRUMP DEFENDS JILL STEIN"- did anyone post that she responded rebuking him? did anyone post that Jill Stein explained that the reason she has to go on Fox News to respond to these accusations is because MSNBC will not let her on the air? did anyone post about how she argues that if Hillary Clinton was truly concerned about Russians boosting Green candidates in our elections, she would support ranked choice voting, which would eliminate the danger of third party voters siphoning votes from the major party candidates? I genuinely cannot tell if you are all so blind from decades of consuming nothing but news and opinion from the perspective of corporate sycophants and CIA agents or just completely bad faith at all times.

---

I'm baby

Centrists in the bougie class love the Russian smear for use on Bernie Sanders for two reasons:
-distracts from how bad their candidates are on the issues by attempting to force you into them, like they do with "the most important thing is to stop donald trump", they will also use "you can't trust x because russia likes them", triangulating them as your only choice and you can't even think about how good or bad they are.
-gives them an out to criticize Bernie for something that isn't his policy stances. they also do this by saying he is grumpy or should smile more or all the nitpicks like that.

---

I'm baby

Ngamer64 posted...

Huh I thought cars weren't needed in Japan...

Japan has rural areas smh have you not even played persona 4

---

I'm baby

I think the important thing out of the entire 'russian asset' discussion is that it is a totally useless term that absolutely nobody should use, and the people who are using it are doing bad faith. If you are just saying "some of the policies they like are policies russia would like america to do" then you are not saying anything worthwhile. If you are alleging they are in some way compromised or working on Russia's behalf, then say that, and provide evidence because that is a serious charge. If you are saying "uhh RT probably wrote a good article about that statement!!" then I mean, who cares? People aren't going to change their views just because it is being boosted by outside forces.

---

I'm baby

official results are in:


---

I'm baby

Pierre Delicto is so fucking funny.

---

I'm baby

https://twitter.com/benjancewicz/status/1185663349696225282

Do these guys know how to party or what?

---

I'm baby

"socialist liberal" "Warren"
I'm dying inside

---

I'm baby

xp1337 posted...

Clinton would unironically make my Top 3 candidates if she were in the field. There is a 0% chance she runs. This is just a right-wing fantasy because she exists rent-free in their heads and "get over [2016]" is simply more projection.

obligatory reminder that she correctly predicted the **** trump would pull before the election even happened

I don't think she is going to run, but I don't think it is a right wing fantasy that she runs. It's a centrist stillwithher thing. I think everyone to the left or right of that wishes to never hear about her or see her ever again (with some adding a caveat for a trial)

---

I'm baby

The nice thing about the Tulsi campaign is that it makes Bernie look better by leeching his shittiest supporters. Unfortunately the bougie class solidarity is hard to break and their complaints about Bernie supporters were never the reason they wouldn't support him. Gotta get those non voters!

---

I'm baby

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

Neolib boomer comedy is cringe bro

Almost as bad as tagging your post (lol) because it's so unfunny people need help with it

---

I'm baby

Shaduln posted...

I wish the user formally known as greengravy294 would believe in me.

I think this is made up. That name sucks.

---

I'm baby

(deep sigh) she's running

---

I'm baby

Looks like the Chilean military is firing on protestors who are protesting the austerity measures the right wing government has put in place. One of the measures, increased public transportation fees, has been reversed. The army has declared a curfew. Hard to say how much of the videos from searching Chile on Twitter are real but if they are, things look really serious. I'm seeing one about an energy companys hq being burned down for their prices. Others are armed police having everyone on their knees trapped in a supermarket.

---

I'm baby

watching some clips of the speeches at the bernie rally had me feeling hopeful so I re-ignited my anger by watching that clip of harvey weinstein on msnbc calling bernie sanders sexist to make sure I remember the world is terrible and nothing good ever happens

---

I'm baby

this idea that something is not a conspiracy theory because like, uh, people have said it before is nonsense. i mean, beyond the fact that to my knowledge literally nobody has said "tulsi gabbard is being groomed by russians to run 3rd party" before on national media, even if they have that would just be further propagating the conspiracy theory. people DID actually suggest anti-Bernie things in national media about speculation that he would run third party in 2016, but without the "russia groomed" aspect, and again like with Tulsi it was a just conspiracy theory that came out of anti-Bernie feelings because he had always maintained that he would not do that, and he didn't do that.

when I suggest something like "jeffrey epstein was murdered", you all call me a conspiracy theorist. there is a lot of reason to think this, and a lot of people have been saying that not only WOULD it happen, but that it did happen. And yet I still get the label! So it seems very disingenuous to decide its a conspiracy theory when I don't think it makes sense, and its not a conspiracy theory when I do think it makes sense. The issue is that you all seem to 'conspiracy theorists' are automatically raving lunatics, and so you cannot let yourself admit you like this one, but that's what you are doing here. It isn't crazy to believe that Tulsi Gabbard could be groomed into running third party, its certainly a conceivable possibility, I don't buy it, but without any evidence saying it on national television is disgraceful and absolutely hawking a conspiracy theory.

---

I'm baby

The media is regularly against Bernie by any objective measure, Hillary is not pointing out the obvious at all (Tulsi is irrelevant and done more to fight for US interests than Hillary by any objective measure, Hillary believes soldiers should die for useless wars and Tulsi does not) and the media is almost consistently shitting on him in every way, and he was accused of being a Russian asset in 2016 by Hillary's camp. He has been constantly attacked and hidden by the media, and Hillary supporters from 2016. You are absolutely living in a total fantasy.

The reason Tulsi appeals to right wingers has nothing to do with Russia and everything to do with being a paleoconservative.

---

I'm baby

Leafeon13N posted...

Conspiracy folks going full crazy here.

This topic is exactly why the bots are able to work effectively.

i agree, the people who believe hillary clintons conspiracy theory uncritically just because they don't like tulsi gabbard are very crazy.

---

I'm baby

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

Also the more I think about it, the more I think a Tulsi 3rd party steals from Trump

it absolutely does.
edit: especially if the nominee is sanders or warren

---

I'm baby

VintageGin posted...

I'm kind of amazed someone took those hashtags as anything but sarcasm

right, which is why if you don't see my posts - its probably because me engaging with you is utterly pointless. conversations are only worthwhile if the people involved can actually hear each other. with some people it just isn't possible.

---

I'm baby

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

Just so were clear, the #stillwithher post was AFTER he called Tulsi incoherent, AND it was directed sarcastically at Hillary, so itd be a masterstroke in hacking if he criticized Tulsi to backtrack seriously revealing he was #stillwithher about Tulsi:

and since apparently this has to be clarified, my hashtags were very blatantly and obviously being sarcastic about hillary clinton and her supporters in spite of her being an unrepentant war criminal

---

I'm baby

People here like to call basically any time you have an opinion a 'conspiracy theory' in this topic for some reason, but here you have Hillary Clinton completely making up the idea that Tulsi is "being groomed" to run third party, an actual conspiracy theory by the standards of any of the things I ever claim are called, and you guys just uncritically accept that what she says is true. Tulsi has never made any mention of running third party, says she won't run third party, and quite literally does not have ANYWHERE near the support or monetary backing to run as an independent. The Green Party is the only vehicle by which she realistically could ever hope to run third party, but there isn't any reason to support thinking she would do so, or that she would even win their primary. Howie Hawkins, the presumptive nominee, has been endorsed by Jill Stein and her VP and could easily beat Tulsi. There is no reason to believe what Hillary Clinton said is true about her being groomed to run third party, or that her running third party would even be a threat.

Did Russians boost Jill Stein? sure, there is evidence they did that. They also did it to lots of other candidates. So the only things Tulsi and Jill Stein really have in common here is that they dared to go against her. And again, I mentioned there is evidence to back up why I think this: her 08 loss resulted in her creating a list of the people she felt went against her by the level of betrayal she felt, evidence she can be extremely vindictive. That is a lot more evidence for what I am putting forth than Hillary put forth about Tulsi being groomed to run third party.

---

I'm baby

She didn't fucking say it to shed the light on how Russian intelligence operates, otherwise she would specifically be blatantly making it very clear that 'asset' can mean that you are unknowingly being boosted and there is no nefarious intent on their parts. She wants you to think that they are colluding with the Russian government, and said it as a smear to damage the campaign of the only person who endorsed Bernie Sanders in 2016. Just because something is true information does not mean you can responsibly just say it without context - and Hillary Clinton knows this, and the rest of you know it too. She is very clearly and obviously not bringing these claims up in order to further the dialogue on combating Russian intelligence interfering in elections - it is revenge, plain and simple.

---

I'm baby

Like, if Hillary Clinton has any evidence whatsoever to support her claims, go for it. Otherwise she is someone who is claiming a veteran who risked their life in wars that Hillary herself voted for, is a traitor for running on a platform of stopping those wars. She put her life on the line and saw what was going on in these wars, and thinks they need to end. Hillary got to sit comfy at home and order the deaths of millions of innocent people, and now she has the gall to accuse Tulsi of being a traitor without evidence? Even if you take it as her saying 'russian asset' only meaning 'unknowingly being boosted as a tool', Hillary Clinton knows exactly what she is doing and how people are going to view her comments, and this is about petty revenge. I am not going to vote for Tulsi, but Hillary is being absolutely vile with these comments.

---

I'm baby

So you are, what, afraid Tulsi Gabbard might crawl up to 2%? Again, if Russia is supporting her because of her foreign policy, it isn't working, and it doesn't mean she supports those policies because Russia told her to.

If Hillary Clinton actually thought Tulsi Gabbard was a Russian asset, she would be calling for her to be arrested and removed from her position in Congress and the US military. She doesn't actually think Tulsi or Jill Stein have anything to do with the Russian government though. She just is trying to get back at the only candidate who endorsed Bernie Sanders who is running.

---

I'm baby

Tulsi has like 1% support and more people like her who aren't Dems than who are because she is basically a paleoconservative. Her main proponent has been Joe Rogan and Jimmy Dore, not Russian bots. You all seem completely deranged. Almost all regular people get their opinions from the mainstream media and mainstream news sources and Russian bots have minimal reach, and there is zero evidence to support that Russia is using bots to support Tulsi Gabbard, and if they are it isn't working. The biggest press she has gotten so far besides Joe Rogan is Hillary Clinton's accusations.

---

I'm baby

Do you guys remember when Hillary Clinton destroyed the country of Libya, a country where healthcare and housing and education were a human right, with a high standard of living, particular for the region, turning it into ruins and a haven for slavers and human trafficking because they literally did not even have a plan to stabilize the country after destroying it?

But at least she doesn't say stuff Russia agrees with

#votebluenomatterwho #stillwithher #slaykween

---

I'm baby

Tulsi and her campaign are completely incoherent, but it's certainly believable she would carry a grudge after Tulsi endorsed Bernie last time. If you recall, after losing to Obama in 08, Hillary had a giant list of betrayals sorted by the level of betrayed she felt. That seems a bit vindictive.

And it is wildly stupid to be fear mongering about Jill Stein, who is not even a candidate for the green party this year, it will almost certainly be Howie Hawkins. And if 'American assets' tell us we have to keep doing forever wars and universal healthcare will never ever happen, then the only rational answer is eat all the rich regardless of nation. They are useless and do not have any of our interests in mind.

---

I'm baby

you also think the soviet union is reforming thanks to donald trump so i mean you are a dumbass

---

I'm baby

i bet it is honestly

---

I'm baby

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

Wow he went to see Lady Gaga in Vegas and didn't even make a topic about it.

UltimaterializerX
I was there. We legitimately all thought she was dead. Then she brought him up on stage and asked everyone on the internet to be nice to him, and played the next song with him like nothing even happened. Poor guy was crying most of the time until she cheered him up.

why do you believe a single thing the man says after all this time

---

I'm baby

flipping mad about the dang conservatives (who are surely going to H E double hockey sticks)

---

I'm baby

banananor posted...

re establishing the ussr!

damn that sounds pretty cool ngl

---

I'm baby

Johnny Eagle posted...

Nice unbiased poll >_>

epic burn! you win the internet today, good sir! *tips my hat*

---

I'm baby