Lurker > Broseph_Stalin
LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
| Board List | |
|---|---|
| Topic | Democratic Primary Super Tuesday (#5) |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 8:27:47 PM #349 | Spiritlittle posted... ALL the younger voters that support Bernie will turn up in the general election. And he'll win.lol |
| Topic | Democratic Primary Super Tuesday (#5) |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 7:55:46 PM #277 | -ZIO- posted... If DNC gives this to Biden, then we voters shut the fuck up |
| Topic | Democratic Primary Super Tuesday (#5) |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 7:46:47 PM #260 | tulsi lost american samoa lmao |
| Topic | Pete and Amy dropping out was rigged |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 7:42:41 PM #2 | 0 days without a bernie bro conspiracy theory |
| Topic | All registered voters in their 30s or younger: please show up today. |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 7:22:00 PM #65 | you did it OP  |
| Topic | Democratic Primary Super Tuesday (#5) |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 7:20:52 PM #223 | DeadBankerDream posted... Is that a specific state or overall?Virginia |
| Topic | Democratic Primary Super Tuesday (#5) |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 7:18:43 PM #214 | DeadBankerDream posted... Has Biden won yet? About to go to bed.polls aren't closing on the west coast anytime soon which is where Bernie is going to perform best |
| Topic | Democratic Primary Super Tuesday (#5) |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 7:14:46 PM #205 | Maverick832 posted... Thankfully I can add you to the block list, off you go. you'll be banned on that account too soon enough, but go ahead anyway |
| Topic | Democratic Primary Super Tuesday (#5) |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 7:12:44 PM #197 | lol oops forgot to do a shitposter check before responding USER INFO: MAVERICK832 New User User Since: Feb 2020 Karma: 7 Active Posts: 20 Total Badges: 0 |
| Topic | Democratic Primary Super Tuesday (#5) |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 7:10:33 PM #192 | sktgamer_13dude posted... Rich coming from you of all people. probably best to go do something else if you guys are gonna start the conspiracy theories and meltdowns this early, it's not healthy |
| Topic | Democratic Primary Super Tuesday (#5) |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 7:09:24 PM #190 | Maverick832 posted... And you really think Biden is a stronger candidate? If he wins then yes, objectively. |
| Topic | Democratic Primary Super Tuesday (#5) |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 7:07:14 PM #185 | Zikten posted... That all happened due to the Dem elites doing a conspiracy against him zikten post treewojima posted... Ah yes, the old "winning an election with 0% precincts reporting" story how do you not know what exit polls are? |
| Topic | Democratic Primary Super Tuesday (#5) |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 7:05:32 PM #179 | Maverick832 posted... Not that I care but still sucks for Sanders, I guess liberals really want to hand Trump another 4 more years, oh well. this whole "guy who couldn't beat hillary and might not beat Biden would definitely beat Trump" shit needs to stop. Sanders is a weak candidate, get over it. |
| Topic | Democratic Primary Super Tuesday (#5) |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 7:02:44 PM #175 | Biden wins Virginia |
| Topic | Democratic Primary Super Tuesday (#5) |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 6:43:31 PM #167 | lol! |
| Topic | It is sad how much the Dems seem to fear Bernie Sanders. |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 6:23:55 PM #2 | sorry about your topic |
| Topic | It's pretty obvious Buttigieg and Klobuchar were told to quit |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 4:48:24 PM #71 | same fucking people who think this is some big conspiracy want Warren to drop out to help Bernie if you've ever wondered why most democrats don't want bernie, take a look at his supporters |
| Topic | Okay. I'm stuck on REmake |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 12:07:48 AM #2 | |
| Topic | Never have a stomachache or never have a headache? |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/03/20 12:06:34 AM #8 | I've never had a headache so stomachaches. |
| Topic | Biden gonna crush it Super Tursday |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/02/20 7:31:26 PM #9 | Zikten posted... But Sanders has more victories than Biden does. he actually doesn't lol |
| Topic | Apparently in the USA, it costs $3000 to get tested for the Coronavirus. |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/02/20 7:25:31 PM #53 | ClunkerSlim posted... A lot of people are going to the emergency room for treatment because they cant afford a primary doctor.????????????????? |
| Topic | Apparently in the USA, it costs $3000 to get tested for the Coronavirus. |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/02/20 7:01:47 PM #33 | The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. The CDC is not billing for testing for COVID 19, so patients will not incur costs when tested by the CDC. |
| Topic | Apparently in the USA, it costs $3000 to get tested for the Coronavirus. |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/02/20 6:54:33 PM #17 | The CDC does not charge for testing, stop believing everything you see on twitter. Stop using youtube grifters as your news source. I can't believe people on this board think they're smarter than the average person. |
| Topic | Women couldn't vote until 1920 basically. |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/02/20 5:36:02 PM #23 | Blue_Inigo posted... Makes you realize how slow the US is when it comes to change. The US granted women the right to vote fairly early, actually. |
| Topic | Democratic Primary General Topic 4-0 |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/02/20 5:20:28 PM #397 | Doom_Art posted... The people simultaneously dumping on the moderate wing for consolidating around Biden while decrying Warren for not dropping out are quite amoosing it's not like bernie supporters have ever acted in good faith |
| Topic | How is healthcare so much cheaper in countries other than the US? |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/01/20 10:27:14 PM #47 | ssjevot posted... 90% of Japanese people have some kind of insurance. Costs are incredibly low with or without it. I think you misunderstood what I said. Insurance has to raise the price of a good, as an insurance provider requires funding to exist. Even a public system that does not seek to profit still has administration cost. You are adding a third party to the typical buyer-seller transaction. Obviously health care is cheaper in Japan than in the US, that's not what I'm saying. |
| Topic | How is healthcare so much cheaper in countries other than the US? |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/01/20 10:04:24 PM #39 |
Health care would be an example of both, so you end up getting really high prices. Most countries address this issue (in very different ways!) but the farthest the US has gone is Medicaid and Medicare which only subsidize our expensive system without fixing the cost issue. |
| Topic | "The freer the market, the freer the people" |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/01/20 7:22:30 AM #7 | MI4 REAL posted... What exactly constitutes a "free market"? The key ingredients of economic freedom are personal choice, voluntary exchange, freedom to compete in markets, and protection of person and property. When governments substitute taxes, government expenditures, and regulations for personal choice, voluntary exchange, and market coordination, they reduce economic freedom. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/EconomicFreedom.html As a wise man once said: "economic freedom is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for political freedom to exist." It is not a coincidence that the nations with the most political freedom in the world also happen to have market economies. |
| Topic | help me present my argument for "socialism" to this guy |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/01/20 12:35:00 AM #10 | Shablagoo posted... Capitalism = exploitation. lmao |
| Topic | help me present my argument for "socialism" to this guy |
| Broseph_Stalin 03/01/20 12:21:37 AM #4 | find a better use of your time than arguing in favor of a discredited 19th century authoritarian ideology that has brought nothing but misery and death to hundreds of millions of people |
| Topic | Democratic Primary General Topic 4-0 |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/29/20 10:11:48 PM #199 | Antifar posted... https://twitter.com/EoinHiggins_/status/1233949288272519168you literally can't take super PAC money, why do people push this lie so much? |
| Topic | Democratic Primary General Topic 4-0 |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/29/20 10:09:58 PM #198 | DaveTheUseless posted... why is Gabbard still running  |
| Topic | US finally out of Afghanistan |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/29/20 10:06:43 PM #45 | Skye Reynolds posted... We didn't sign terms of surrender. We agreed to a complete withdrawal for nothing more than a pinky promise from them over terrorist attacks against us. Ask yourself why we're even negotiating and signing a treaty with an insurgent group, we've already legitimized them as the government of Afghanistan. |
| Topic | Democratic Primary General Topic 4-0 |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/29/20 9:30:36 PM #185 | |
| Topic | Democratic Primary General Topic 4-0 |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/29/20 9:29:17 PM #181 | RchHomieQuanChi posted... I don't know how you could have possibly come to that conclusion based off of one state. Four states have voted actually, it's the very first thing I said in that post you quoted. |
| Topic | Democratic Primary General Topic 4-0 |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/29/20 9:24:31 PM #179 | So with the first four states done it looks like the guy leading in the popular vote is... Biden. Bernie needs Bloomberg in the race, funnily enough. |
| Topic | US finally out of Afghanistan |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/29/20 8:49:32 PM #34 | this isn't a peace deal so much as it's a surrender agreement art of the deal! |
| Topic | FF10 was the last true Final Fantasy that Square actually put massive effort in |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/29/20 8:39:16 PM #22 | MarthGoomba posted... Because it's just copying the WoW template of fetch quests and dungeons that practically play themselves FFXI was released before WoW lol 14... yeah pretty much |
| Topic | Biden is not the answer |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/29/20 8:26:46 PM #17 | Suchomimus posted... Why are southern democrats so dense? CruelBuffalo posted... coded language is hella coded they always stick to the script  |
| Topic | Biden wins South Carolina |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/29/20 8:14:53 PM #9 | Supernatural posted... Is this the first time they were on time with the counting?no? |
| Topic | FF10 was the last true Final Fantasy that Square actually put massive effort in |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/29/20 8:12:16 PM #6 | how does a game being an mmorpg mean no effort was put into it lol |
| Topic | Where on the political compass do you generally fall? |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/28/20 6:11:52 PM #19 | these quizzes are always so dumb, the very first question is a false dilemma the pic in the OP is even dumber though |
| Topic | In 1965 CEOs in US earned 20x more than the average worker. In 2015 it was 300x |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/28/20 4:59:54 PM #57 | E32005 posted... your only examples are massive global corps. most people are employed by medium sized business. As I've said multiple times, the people running those medium sized companies don't get as much compensation as the people running massive global corps, meaning my point remains true. It wouldn't matter if you divided billions of dollars among hundreds of thousands of workers or millions among thousands, lower CEO pay would not positively impact workers because the amount spent on them is actually very small. Companies pay a market rate to get as good a CEO as they can to make sure they are successful, which is what actually impacts workers wages. |
| Topic | In 1965 CEOs in US earned 20x more than the average worker. In 2015 it was 300x |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/28/20 4:54:07 PM #56 | Frolex posted... Seems like it makes a great argument not to compromise with conservative economic policy and pass tax code regulation thats as stringent as possible. There was no compromise, it was a campaign promise from Bill Clinton to limit CEO pay. Company performance based compensation was meant to be a fairer system where they would have to earn their money, but when CEO pay increased under that system they kept whining anyway. Frolex posted... We're talking about the level of growth in CEO wages contrasted with those of workers. If the real wages for the working class has massively increased in turn, that wouldnt be a problem. The issue isn't in just comparing the pay of a CEO to one worker. There's no particular reason why a worker, who could be anyone in any type of position, would have wage increases at the same rate as someone who runs a massive company with hundreds of thousands of employees. A more reasonable expectation is that worker compensation should keep pace with productivity growth, and it is. Frolex posted... No one's saying average standard of living is lower than it was 60 years ago. But they have gone up in spite of growing economic inequality. The US has higher wages, lower unemployment and higher GDP growth than nations that have "solved" inequality in Europe. CEO pay is very insignificant compared to both the revenue their companies bring in and the money they spend on worker compensation. It has zero negative impact on any of our lives. Making someone else poorer does not make you richer which is why inequality is a useless statistic out of context. |
| Topic | In 1965 CEOs in US earned 20x more than the average worker. In 2015 it was 300x |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/28/20 8:29:43 AM #39 | Balrog0 posted... the bigger issues involved with CEO compensation it's as if there was some kind of change in the tax code that tied CEO pay to company performance |
| Topic | In 1965 CEOs in US earned 20x more than the average worker. In 2015 it was 300x |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/28/20 8:27:52 AM #38 | Balrog0 posted... What's there to refute? I've never seen anyone say that you could fix economic inequity by reducing CEO compensation. This is exactly what they say. In this very topic even. There's zero reason to even bring up CEO pay otherwise. |
| Topic | In 1965 CEOs in US earned 20x more than the average worker. In 2015 it was 300x |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/28/20 8:17:27 AM #34 | Hairistotle posted... Broseph argues in bad faith, anyone who isn't a troll recognizes that by now Balrog0 posted... I just didn't see anything in all those words and points that said much of anything. It just reads as corporate apologism I love how mad people get when they can't refute anything I say. |
| Topic | In 1965 CEOs in US earned 20x more than the average worker. In 2015 it was 300x |
| Broseph_Stalin 02/28/20 8:16:28 AM #32 | MacadamianNut3 posted... Unfortunately there are a tad bit more than 2 companies with CEOs, so sorry for the lack of astonishment over "large number divided by 2.1 million is a small number, therefore argument over sheeple" ANY fucking CEO compensation divided up by the workforce is going to result in a low number, you have missed the point by a mile. A smaller company also means less CEO pay and the end result remains the same. You can take a company with tons of revenue, high CEO compensation and relatively few employees like Chevron and you'll find the exact same thing, CEO pay has no impact on average wages. Sit. Down. |
| Board List |