Lurker > codey

JOE EXOTIC WAS FRAMED

The producers do an impressive making Carole and Jeff Lowe look like villains in a sea of terrible people

---

*runs out of topic naked*

I like Courtney, but I don't really see the comparison.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

The original, but the first I beat was Link to the Past and then the Oracles. Besides the original I only played handheld ones until BotW since the Switch is the first nonhandheld Nintendo console I've owned since the NES.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

I like old fashioneds, but I'm a bearded guy with tattoos so I'm obligated to.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

KillerSlaw posted...

I mean who would even desire a relationship when depressed?

People aren't always deprrssed. There's waves to it.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

Because I'm sad they let the Tony Hawk games go to shit, and Skate seems like a dead series. Are there any recent ones that are fun?

---

*runs out of topic naked*

Yo they really named their kid Dill Pickles

---

*runs out of topic naked*

A sarlacc pit done so poorly everyone asks why you have a butthole tattoo and you have to explain it every time.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

Irony posted...

I can't watch her anymore after that story

Wait what story

---

*runs out of topic naked*

Why do guys like posting on gamefaqs.gamespot.com so much?

---

*runs out of topic naked*

I got up to like level 48 and just watched how it ended on YouTube. I loved the game, but all the fun had been had, I was ready to move on.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

lightwarrior78 posted...

Bay at least puts out things that can be called "fun bad" while TLJ didn't even have that going for it.

That's one movie out of of Johnson's pretty damn good body of work. Brick is good, Looper is good, and Knives Out is good.

Bay has Bad Boys and The Rock.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

Why would I care about these when she has, you know, actual porn to watch.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

I would have weird feelings, but I wouldn't be "upset." I've always been of the mindset that the people that raised you to be the person you are your parents.

Like if I found out my child wasn't mine, I would be upset at my spouse but I would still love the child as my own.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

TheMikh posted...

nah, this is now an abigail topic

https://i.imgur.com/d74Fbta.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/3TveBlt.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/jI6qUFr.jpg

Don't even try to convince me that's not Ben in a dress

---

*runs out of topic naked*

HBKick18 posted...

She's gonna look like old Michael Jackson by the end of this decade

---

*runs out of topic naked*

YellowMustard69 posted...

I've said multiple times that firing him may have been the best action in certain contexts. We don't know the context though. So until then there's reason to believe that either could have been the better decision.

Why won't you address that no company would ever want the PR that comes with keeping on a manager that caters to racists?

---

*runs out of topic naked*

YellowMustard69 posted...

If you can solve a problem equally with less resources, you should do it. That's all I'm saying.

Becoming known as the company that kept on a person that caters to racists in a managerial role costs a lot more than firing him and getting a new manager, which actually costs, what do you know, nothing.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

If your reaction when confronted with racism is to panic and cater to them, you have no business being a manager, especially if your subordinated are people of color. There isn't a corporation in the country that would keep on a manager that responded like this manager would.

I won't say he's racist because we don't know, but his actions were so irresponsible that he basically invited more racists to come in demean his staff.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

I won't argue for or against him being racist, because we really don't know. What we do know is that his actions catered to racists, no matter why he did them.

No corporation in America sans Breitbart or Stormfront would continue to employ someone after this. His actions damaged the company by making it look like a place you could go to and literally demand black people don't come close to touching your food. Maybe if you work at a small town diner you can get away with keeping your job, but a national corporation pretty much has to fire you, there's no other choice on their end.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

YellowMustard69 posted...

The racist doesn't go away. It goes somewhere else.

Going somewhere else is leaving.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

Probably no mayo or something.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

YellowMustard69 posted...

Nope. Because the customer is the one who is the racist. The customer is the one who created the racism. There is no additional racism created by the restaurant. And that racism does not go away once the customer leaves the building.

If you remove the racist it actually does go away. If you appease them it doesn't, because now you've set a standard that racism is not only allowed but catered to.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

YellowMustard69 posted...

Yeah, but it's racism on part of the customer, not the restaurant.

If the restaurant sees that request as reasonable and appeases the customer, it is indeed racism on their part.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

YellowMustard69 posted...

Every restaurant is different. Some have no problem telling customers to take a hike. The one I worked for was huge on customer service. We always took care of their requests.

Why do you seem so angry at me to the point where you're accusing me of lying? That's really weird.

If the request you take care of is "Don't let a black person go near my food" then your restaurant didn't deserve customers at all. That's not a request, that's blatant racism.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

If you're out partying you're not likely to be around the people that lost their homes.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

Again, if your response as a manager is to panic and respond to blatantly racist demands by caving to them, you shouldn't be a manager.

And if you think a giant corporation like Olive Garden would ever deal with the negative of PR of keeping a manager that wouldn't let a white woman be served by a black person you're insane. This isn't the type of mistake you train someone and move on from, this is the type where you cut ties.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

The_Ivory_Man posted...

People hated it when it happened in the EU too.

Other EU writers were criticizing the decision, and this was before the prequels came out even. It was always a disliked thing. So why would Disney bring in so much disliked stuff.

This is such a stupid case of whataboutism that shows up constantly.

It's not whataboutism. People are acting like Disney killed the end of Ep. 6, when the EU did it a long time ago. People may not have liked it then, but it doesn't change the fact that that's where Disney got the idea from.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

I get that the manager most likely panicked, but if your reaction in this situation is to panic and cave to the racist demand then you shouldn't be a manager. There's teaching moments, but this isn't one of them.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

ViewtifulGrave posted...

Thats because Disney retcond it.

The EU retconned it a long time ago.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

That article didn't mention Tulsi once, and even said it was now a two-person race. I get that she's a long, long, loooooooong shot, but she's still in the race. Warren wasn't the last hope for women.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

Wasn't the clone shit from the EU before Disney ever even had SW?

---

*runs out of topic naked*

legendarylemur posted...

I can't believe he's bad-mouthing Game of Thrones, is he Alt-Right?

No i don't like Daenerys

---

*runs out of topic naked*

I feel like saying Japanese devs are more willing to get creative and weird is only considering AAA western devs, because the western indie scene is incredibly diverse and creative with a ton of out there games.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

Bio1590 posted...

But it always worked that way in third versions.

Red/Blue you can get Pikachu
Gold/Silver you can get Suicune
Ruby/Sapphire you can get Rayquaza
Diamond/Pearl you can get Giratina

They only nuked it when they stopped doing them.

I guess but Suicune wasn't even baller, he was just one of the trio, the rest are like legendary-legendary, and they buffed Pikachu in yellow didn't they?

---

*runs out of topic naked*

Gold was for weak trainers, cools kids played silver.

What I didn't like was how the mascot in Crystal was a Pokemon you could have already had in previous versions.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

Manocheese posted...

Don't forget "bought 8000 slaves."

You right.

Blonde hair, loves civil wars, fucks her nephew, frequents slave auctions.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

Blonde hair, loves civil wars, fucks her nephew.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

It's pretty bad, but there are some questions the article doesn't answer. Are these farms run by Starbucks or Nestle? The article just calls them suppliers. If they're just suppliers, do they sell beans to other companies? Who else is connected? I find it real hard to believe that they're the only culprits here.

I mean, if they're just buying beans from them is there anything they can do beside stop buying from them? If that's the case they don't control the farms hiring practices.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

bruh he ded. mass effect happened like a million years ago


---

*runs out of topic naked*

yellow red green

edit: fuck I forgot blue

I mean, I've only used it once to buy a painting like 10 years ago but still

---

*runs out of topic naked*

That's...not a good tattoo. It never looks right when guys go straight to tattoos above their collar bones. I know he's got the small chest tat, but that's just not enough to keep this from feeling waaaaay out of place, especially with how white meat, classic babyface he presents himself as. And I'm far from against tattoos, I've got four of them and want more.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

Questionmarktarius posted...

http://www.gadgetduck.com/goods/kneedefender.html
You're welcome.

The knee defender isn't for people that like space, it's for people that like to start arguments with strangers.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

uwnim posted...

Changing your seat angle does not address the issues that make flying uncomfortable. The issues are a lack of room and being stuck in one place for a long period of time. What reclining does it change the angle of your back, it doesn't provide more space for your legs, it doesn't change that you are seated and it doesn't let you start moving around so your body doesn't have issues. What it does do is reduce the space around the legs of the person behind you and make them more cramped and reduces what little space they'd have to move even further. As such, there are no reasons to recline. This isn't an opinion, it is an irrefutable fact.

Reclining absolutely alleviates pain in my back, even if it's just a couple of inches.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

For your screen to get destroyed like that you have to have it pressed straight into the back of the seat in front of you don't you?

---

*runs out of topic naked*

Couple of weeks ago. I replay the single player every now and then, it's fun. Never got into online tho.

---

*runs out of topic naked*

I don't understand how it's bad advice. If you can work from home, do so, it will make you safer. If you can't, don't, and continue taking other precautions.

Why are some of you getting so upset that not everyone can work from home? Obviously everyone knows that. If you can't, ignore the advice.

---

*runs out of topic naked*