Lurker > CoolCly

v_charon posted...

. If you have a problem with the raid finder, then you just want to keep people out of content you view as solely for yourself. No one should have a problem with the raid finder because it either helps you or you ignore it.

Do you really believe that it's impossible to think something had good and bad consequences without being a person that hates casuals and thinks everything should be catered to them? Is that the only possible outcome?

You are just wrong about this "it's optional and you just keep playing the way you were' thought process though. If something has a big impact on the game, it doesn't just change it for whoever chooses to use it - it's a giant ecosystem and every system works with eachother.

Like here's a current example with classic: some people have made an addon that you can post you are looking for group and it will communicate with everyone else that has the addon. So you can just post "Holy priest looking for group' and everyone that needs a healer will get that message and you can just immediately form a group. This is essentially making a circumspect group finderthrough whispers, and it was actually possible during vanilla, it was just no addon developers came up with it. This undoes one of the benefits people see in vanilla which was that you had to find group members by advertising in trade chat or join a guild or make friends or whatever.

Many people argued that if you don't want to use it and change your experience, then just don't use the addon. This is wrong. It's just not true. Blizzard came out and said this directly - once it's out there in the wild, it still affects you. Other players will be using it, and you won't be able to find a group. It changes the entire environment whether you want to use it or not.

So Blizzard is disabling this addon and others like it.

I never actually said the raid finder was a bad thing by itself though. My entire argument is that many changes that caused individual improvements have added together to change Retail into an experience that a lot of fans of WoW are not looking for.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

it doesn't sound like you are trying to look at this from any perspective other than your own

I agree that this "opened the game up to different players that weren't willing to dedicate their lives to WoW fighting through the ranks of a guild and kissing the Guild Master's ass so they could raid and get loot."

that doesn't mean it didn't have other consequences.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

sounds like a good choice to me

i'm going horde because my buddy wants to but there's a strong side of me that wants to go alliance because i never really had that perspective
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

I'm considering just taking one of tailoring/enchanting at first and using skinning just to grab stuff to vendor since i probably wont invest a ton of resources into training it while levelling anyway. then I'll grab the other later. Not sure yet though.

hot tip: do not go mining/herbalism together. You can only track one type of node at a time in Classic. If you want double gathering go Skinning/one of the two.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

azuarc posted...

I played survival hunter. The original talent tree had a final talent that was a pitiful melee dot. I don't want to go back to that. But the revised tree from version 1.7 was fantastic. So were the trees from BC and Lich King. And then when I tried to come back, there was no talent tree, no choices, just "pick a spec and we'll randomly give you stuff at certain levels."

I mean, sure, under the old versions you had the chance to gimp yourself, but you also had the chance to do something really cool, too. I never followed cookie cutter specs precisely, even if what I ended up with was moderately close. But I also found ways to explore my character in ways that other people didn't. Nobody brought a hunter to their group expecting them to CC 4 or 5 mobs at once, but there were time periods where I was doing just that. What kind of flexibility or freedom is there in character building now?

Talent trees are a really funny one - I absolutely agree with their design philosophy that the old trees did not have any choice, and the new system actually offers you a lot more relevant decision making on what your character can do. Really, the way the old system worked is that you had to pick most of the talents that mattered for your spec the same as everyone else, and the ones you didnt pick were garbage that didn't do anything. When there was choice, it was just on like "increases the damage of your frost spells by 2%" vs " increase crit damage bonus on frost spells" which comes down to a mathematician somewhere figuring that out for you, or just picking which one sounds better to you without really knowing which one had a bigger impact.

There are SOME cases where you would have a choice of going into a different secondary tree to get a 1/1 ability that actually matters... but that's pretty much the same thing as just picking a tier in the new system.

So trying to turn this into a system where your choices actually matter sounds great. But somehow it just doesn't work out. Despite not actually offering you much real choice, the old talent tree just has this cool feeling that gives you the illusion of choice. And the new system somehow feels more limiting. It's a really strange phenomena. From a design perspective I completely agree the new system is better, but it just doesn't feel that way in practice.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

A thing that REALLY bugs me in retail is world quests. I remember when I first did them in Legion I thought it was a cool way to get gear. Then I realized that was my entire pre raid gearing process. Just do world quests every day until I get the best pre raid gear I can get. But like.... gearing up is really fun to me. Going into a specific dungeon or completing a quest line to get an important piece of gear I need as a stage in my character's growth is the best feeling in the world. And in retail... it's just attached to some random world quest unrelated to the item itself. They've completely taken out the investment in progression in the game. But if you look at the world quest mechanic in particular, you can say - okay, this is a more streamlined version of daily quest that gives you a choice on which content to repeat every day. There is genuine improvement here over what we were already doing..... but man does it take the soul out of it. I don't feel like I earned having a full set of best in slot pre raid gear. I just followed the quest markers until I got it.

WoW Classic is not a perfect game. that's why did so many improvements to it that led us to today. It will have tons of things that make people quit playing it. But it has a lot of really strong pro's that Retail does not deliver on. that maybe no other competitor delivers on.

Retail just doesn't offer the experience I'm looking for. It's hard to say or not if WoW Classic will deliver on it again like it did in the past either. But I definitely don't get what I want when I play Retail wow. The only thing that really keeps me playing a bit each expansion is that I love the world and characters so much that I just want to keep finding out what's going on.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

v_charon posted...

azuarc posted...

I tried to play a character to 20 for some Hearthstone incentive about 2 years ago, and I absolutely could not stand the current iteration of the game. It scrubbed basically everything I liked about WoW, and replaced it with a bunch of streamlined crap and controls that didn't make sense to me. What I liked about WoW is that it had all of the charm and mystery of playing a game like EverQuest, but that it took out the awful parts -- you could do things solo, there were quests and objectives besides just grinding, battles were more meaningful then just pressing A and watching. But the rest of the experience was there. Most of that's been removed in favor of catering to the LCD and ignoring the leveling experience entirely. Or at least that's what it felt like to me.

I'm not going to deny the game was streamlined for people who probably aren't usually very good at video games, but at the same time, I feel like they've done a great job with class balance and I don't feel you can objectively say they haven't compared to older versions of the game. You shouldn't feel like you're restricted to choosing only certain classes or roles when you play a game; I mean, what's the point of having them there if they aren't any good? Like I have played Retribution all my gaming history in WoW; back when the final point in the talent tree was as it is now, Repentance, which is not even a DPS ability but rather a CC one (and a limited to enemy type one, at that). Why on earth is the final thing you learn, what you assume to be your best ability since you get it last, one that is in no way beneficial to your play style? That was the huge error in classic WoW, and they kept it that way. No disrespect to them keeping it that way since it highlights what they are going for, but that's simply bad game design. Imagine playing Final Fantasy VII and Cloud finally learns his last limit break and it's a self healing spell or something. There's no reward to be had there.

hmmm

it's the conundrum of Retail in general. they've done many things to improve the game. Have they done a bad job to get Retail where it is? Was creating the group finder and raid finder to objectively make it easier to find groups so people don't have to waste time looking for a group a bad move? Well, it certainly succeeded at making it wayyyy easier to actually play the game. Was adding portals to take you all the different corners of the world not an improvement, even though it saves you sooo much time? Both these changes had major quality of life improvements but also significant costs to the DNA of the game that can't really be undone.

A feature of early WoW was that classes had unique strengths and weaknesses. some had no real strengths like Ret and just sucked. Most specs had a reason you brought them to a certain raid or why you used them in PVP. You'd bring a warlock to a raid to banish a certain target. You'd bring Mages because their AOE is objectively better than everyone else's. Classes did not do equal damage, so there was no reason to bring certain classes. Does that suck? yeah. But the current design philosphy is homogenization - which erases the reason anybody in particular is there. If a third of the raid has a bloodlust, then it's not special if a shaman is brought to the raid or not.

It's a cool effect when you say a certain class is being added to your group because then a certain ability is provided. That effect doesn't really exist in Retail right now. Yeah, it sucks that some specs just suck in Classic, but there's also positives in how it works.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

it sounds like you have A LOT to learn from it
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

i'm sorry you can't appreciate greatness though. everyone always says it's book 4 but man book 3 is when I fell in love with Harry Dresden. It's just a better version of the first book with so much interesting lore building with Michael, Lea, the vampires... I loooove the ball where everything goes to hell.

I don't know why you are so personally upset about people telling you when it gets good though. It's just objectively true that the first two books aren't as good as the later ones, even though they do have the tone of the series.

I will say it doesn't sound like you really get Harry. It doesn't tell you when Harry is upset. It doesn't need to. You can interpret everything Harry is feeling by the way he talks to or about someone, or the actions he takes. To say he doesn't feel anything is a very bizarre take. He's one of the most heartfelt characters I think I've ever experienced in fiction, and the most recent thing I've read, the short story anthology Brief Cases, literally had me tearing up in multiple stories.

This is a story about Christmas. It's literally the most recent thing published in the series, so it's MASSIVE spoilers for many things, obviously. If you read this and do not feel anything, then it's really your problem.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/12hNgNIqJM5jqHqC-J-jfLA0WNDG2zEW8TrK_uPzpUJg/edit
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

here lies harry dresden

he died doing the right thing
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

I think she's super underrated in Two Broke Girls. The show isn't very good but she plays her part extremely well and is really funny.

If you disagree then you hate women.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

I love Kat Dennings
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

Personally, i loved TurnTurnTurn

Revealing SHIELD was infested by Hydra changed the course of the show forever. Where would we even be now if that hadn't happened?
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

I like this show

I've always found All Might to be pretty great, ever since the "you can be a hero" scene. I can't think of another paragon of a hero meant to emulate Superman/Captain America done as well as him. Most things can't pull it off so they resort to doing a cheap parody like a Major Glory or something.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

I really don't believe that Fortnite was product placement in the sense of "we got money from Fortnite, find a way to put it in the movie"
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

the hulk scene with the kids is great. he's finally accepted the way he always wanted to be and it's by playing along with these kids and their silly thing

this is definitely an "I dont understand kids anymore therefore this is dumb" situation from you guys
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

you can do it Tom
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

so just incase anybody is wondering, this is what the "absolutely nobody" meme is talking about
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

possibly hot take but i thought Morbius was cooler *because* of the plasma angle rather than blood and I was disappointed to find out he's just a more run of the mill vampire in the comics
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

People are saying you are being nice for working with them but....

This is a job right? You are being paid for this? And they paid for this service?

If you guys shut down after they paid you it's kinda on you guys to make things work
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

Eddv posted...

CoolCly posted...

Well, it was worthwhile at first, but does it make sense to continue to make the movies for free forever? At what point should they stop doing it? Is it in 10 years? In three more movies? Is it now?

Its hardly 'for free'. 5% of the gross + merchandising a lot for a film they paid $0 to produce.

Sony is still taking all the risk and fronting all of the costs here. It just isn't being percieved as the risk it is because of how unstoppable the juggernaut has become.

they don't get 5% gross. they get 5% first day gross which, while significant to an actor when they get that deal, is not significant to a movie studio that produces the movie.

People keep bringing up the merchandising rights - but they have that no matter what. It's mostly irrelevant to the whole discussion. Whether Disney makes a movie or Sony makes a movie or nobody makes a movie, Disney still sells spiderman toys. The best case scenario is that Marvel makes a great movie that makes kids want to buy toys more, but this isn't particularly relevant to the deal.

After all, Sony's position is that they can make great Spider-Man movies without Marvel. If that's true, Disney gets good toy sales no matter what. It doesn't change anything.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

Well, it was worthwhile at first, but does it make sense to continue to make the movies for free forever? At what point should they stop doing it? Is it in 10 years? In three more movies? Is it now?
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

I'm interested in recommending some stuff, I missed the last one!

My goals for my choice:

- It's personally really special to me
- the episode is relatively standalone
- Scarlet hasn't seen it
- anime

I'm gonna be so mad when he gives it a bad review. Maybe i should just start getting mad now.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

When Ulti saw Spiderverse, he actually did make a couple posts being like "hey I saw this...and I didn't think it was very good.... why does everyone like it? What am I missing? is there something I didn't get????" like he genuinely wanted to know but I don't think anybody engaged him on it

Now he's moved into full "this is a trash movie and anybody who likes it is dumb" mode on it.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

To be fair, Far From Home has Iron Man in the movie for literally zero minutes but it still found a way to be about Iron Man!
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

how do we know that disney did this

because i thought about doing this

the only thing that held me back was competency
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

Maybe that's the play

"Sorry Sony, Spider-Man is public domain, you can't stop us from using him in our Marvel movies anymore"
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

Lightning Strikes posted...

CoolCly posted...

To be clear, the deal for Spidey originally was extremely atrocious for Marvel - they do all of the work and get none of the financial benefit.

They just really wanted Spidey in their movies. There's plenty for room to argue that they benefited from having him around anyways and they most certainly did

But it's not outrageous or greedy for them to want to renegotiate an equal deal when they are the ones making magic happen. They've proven they know how to make live action Spidey great and successful while Sony doesn't. It would be silly to keep handing all of the profit to Sony.

To say "Sony just wanted to keep the same deal as the first two movies." as if that's a fair and equitable thing and they are being reasonable is pretty absurd.

Disney could probably come down on 50/50 but taking the same deal as before would be pretty bad. I'd guess it's Sony refusing to come up at all here.

This is completely incorrect. Sony produce the films entirely, including complete financing, distribution, and marketing. Marvel has creative oversight but that is it. Even that is not complete creative control, the Far From Home mid-credits scene was Sony's proposal for instance. It is the other way around, Sony were the ones doing the work. Marvel also get 100% of merchandising. 5% is actually better than the original deal too, which was a flat fee.

Make no mistake - the Tom Holland Spider-Man movies are Sony pictures. Sony made the films with Marvel's help, not the other way around.

I'm sure a deal will be reached though, hopefully not depending on Disney further tightening their grip on everything.

Now, I notice you say "Sony produce the films entirely, including complete financing, distribution, and marketing" which makes it a Sony picture except you left out a small crucial piece of of the puzzle of making a movie which is actually making the movie. Production.

Marvel made the movies, full stop. You are wrong about that. They cast the film, their composer that did Doctor Strange did the score, Victoria Alonso was the producer who made most of the decisions, they chose the directors and screenwriters and worked with them to plot out the movie, they worked with the FX vendors... literally every step of production was done by Marvel. Everything about how those movies were made came from Marvel, not Sony. They brought in their people that knew what they were doing and made awesome movies. The expertise that led to everything in these movies would have been absent if Marvel was not involved.

Sony financed the film of course, Marvel wouldn't spend the $200 million to make the movie and not get any return at all, which is why the new Disney proposal is cofinancing, not just a share in the profits. They both contribute to the budget and proportionally get profit back.

Distribution, sure, but distribution is completely separate from making the film and is often done by a different company than the one who actually makes the movie, which is the case here.

The deal could be summarized as this. "hey Marvel here's $200 million go make me a movie. ok thanks for the movie I'm gonna sell this and keep all the money thanks for doing that, see ya next time"
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

how many of the remaining episodes have you seen before?
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

I think they're wrong. This method is under the assumption that player count will drop off drastically after a month, which may happen.

But if it doesn't, which may also happen, then we'll be stuck with servers with vastly more players than they can hold without a queue, meaning either they'll have to keep layering or open new servers for people to reroll on.

I don't want to have to reroll. And I definitely don't want layering.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

They intend to do layering for the first month, which means way more people than the servers can handle will be allowed in and they'll split people up into separate instances.

So if me and you are on the same server in the Barrens we might be in different instances of the Barrens

I would say public reception to this is .... super poor. and I'm very annoyed by it. That kind of tech is probably one of the most annoying and community breaking things about Retail WoW.

But Blizzard believes this is necessary for the initial launch and then will turn it off after a month.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

Venom above Far From Home consider me proven wrong
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

HanOfTheNekos posted...

FFH spoilers
post credit scene with JJJ done on purpose to shield from this? Peter avoids the spotlight either entirely or rebrands as Hornet?

They already set this up

He's the Night Monkey

Marvel does it again!
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

Mr Lasastryke posted...

CoolCly posted...

They've proven they know how to make live action Spidey great and successful while Sony doesn't.

eh, i wouldn't agree with the "great" part. haven't seen far from home yet but i'll take spider-man 2 over homecoming.

a silly argument - whether or not spiderman 1/2 are as good or better than the Holland movies is irrelevant. That's a different era of film making and not at all reflective of the current film making abilities of Sony.

Unless you trying to tell me The Amazing Spider man 2 and Venom are better than the Holland movies...
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

To be clear, the deal for Spidey originally was extremely atrocious for Marvel - they do all of the work and get none of the financial benefit.

They just really wanted Spidey in their movies. There's plenty for room to argue that they benefited from having him around anyways and they most certainly did

But it's not outrageous or greedy for them to want to renegotiate an equal deal when they are the ones making magic happen. They've proven they know how to make live action Spidey great and successful while Sony doesn't. It would be silly to keep handing all of the profit to Sony.

To say "Sony just wanted to keep the same deal as the first two movies." as if that's a fair and equitable thing and they are being reasonable is pretty absurd.

Disney could probably come down on 50/50 but taking the same deal as before would be pretty bad. I'd guess it's Sony refusing to come up at all here.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

Not sure. It's looking like Whitemane but it's really whatever my buddy that takes this super seriously ends up going on.

Definitely NA, almost certainly PVP, and probably West. So if not Whitemane, probably Fairbanks.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

It's funny because I somehow got caught up in the rush to reserve my name that I'm generally known by with people I've played with, which is Desuka my Blood Elf Rogue I've mained since Cata

But then I got in there and I thought.... Desuka is my female Blood Elf rogue. I even 3d printed her statue out. Grimmsh is the male Orc Warrior I played in Vanilla, was my secondary in BC, and my main in Wrath. Zokol was my male Undead Priest I mained in BC. I have very definite impressions and memories of all three of them, and playing their class in vanilla or even playing a different class with one of their names doesn't feel right. This is the time to create new memories with a new character.

So I rushed home after work and got into the character creation screen on reserve day all ready to start reserving Desuka.... then decided I didn't want to do that at all and spent like 3 hours trying to think up a name.

I think I'm going with Rylaina the female Troll Mage. It's a combination of Rylai and Lina... the ice and fire sorceresses from dota 2. Feels appropriate for a wow mage.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

i got roped into a fantasy football league at work

i consistently got destroyed in the best board 8 fantasy football league when i played so you all must know what you are doing

tell me how to win plz
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

What exactly is cold brew? An iced capp?
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

MrSmartGuy posted...

Back in 2013, I noticed a trend where it seemed like every third month had a T-shirt in it, so I signed up for one month, got a T-shirt in mine, then unsubscribed. I still have my Kool-Aid Man dressed as Deadpool T-shirt, but that's all I kept.

i remember making a lootcrate topic because it was new and you replied and were like "hmm i think a shirt is coming up, i'm gonna gamble on getting one". looks like it paid off.

i still love my deadpool koolaidman
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

red13n posted...

skullbone posted...

I mean that's kinda how every business works.

I mean that as in with an extra middle man trying to make a profit rather than buying the stuff from just one person taking a profit on you.

Literally how every business works

Lootcrate probably has less middlemen then most
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

why shouldn't the killer camp a hook? when i watch streams i've noticed they don't usually do it and i assumed it was just because it's kinda cheap
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

Keep in mind Priest gets extra racials! Troll vs Undead also means Shadowguard and Hex of Weakness vs Devouring Plague and Touch of Weakness
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

dragon warrior monsters is a gameboy color game and it's one of my favourite games of all time

the ultimate monster breeding game
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

i'm getting super excited about playing this suddenly

I'm thinking Mage.

Honestly I want to play a Warrior, Priest, or Rogue but those are three classes iv put literally thousands of hours into already so I really feel like I should try a class I haven't played. not into Shaman or Druid, can't play Paladin on Horde, and Warlock seems kinda horrible to play with debuff slot limits and soulshards.

So I guess it's between Mage and Hunter? I could go either way but Frost Mages are just so good at like everything, I think that's the one.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

TomNook posted...

The real problem isn't that they get made, but that studios pool a priority of their budget into them, which steers the mainstream appeal into movies like that, and hinder other types of film from being marketed, or even produced, properly. To an extent of course. All types of movies still get made, but this factually reduces them.

I'm sure this is true a little but I don't think it's actually that big. There's definitely attempts to copycat Marvel but Warner Bros is the only one that's really tried making A LOT more than in the past. Fox and Sony are the next biggest but they've always been making superhero movies. If anything the studios are just trying to connect movies like the Universal Monster universe

Marvel Studios itself was created solely to make superhero movies. It's just a new studio doing it's "niche' specialty, so just because they exist and are doing their thing doesn't mean other studios can't make other movies, and Marvel Studios wouldn't be making other movies to begin with.

Now, Marvel consistently making 2-3 movies a year that are really good might be making competition tough for other studios.... but that's not Marvels fault. Other studios just need to make good movies.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

they have no business getting hit by thwack


---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

They cancelled A HELL of a lot more movies than 12, like literally hundreds, and the ones you listed were not in production, or even in pre production, they were just in super early stages of attaching talent.

https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/cnfixp/a_comprehensive_list_of_all_the_former_fox/

I think the ones in production (which means actually being filmed) aren't being cancelled.. .yet.
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG

It's so interesting to see people affected by caffeine. Many people around me seem to have a genuine change in attitude and/or behaviour after drinking coffee

Am I cursed for not being able to benefit from this or blessed for not getting the negatives?
---

The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG