Lurker > Corrik

redrocket posted...

Whiskey_Nick posted...

man i never get busy at bingo

its just me and 70 people over 70

Out of 70 people there's not one GILF among them?

Yeah. The one Rock supposedly went home with. Hope he learned something from it.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

TheRock1525 posted...

Except there is a 99.9% chance I will run into this woman again because I frequent this bar a lot.

So just act like a normal person to her and don't get involved romantically with her if you don't wish to.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

^trying to generate hits and plug his friend.

Lolol

Also, supposedly has a one night stand with a girl and wants to be "harsh and confrontational" with her for it.

This has to be fake.

If real, you know you could... Just not text her again. Lol.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

ShatteredElysium posted...

I mean if Kentucky and LSU both win then it's very likely 4 out of the 5 on that list end up higher ranked than Notre Dame's highest ranked win. LSU are favored, Kentucky are not.

If you discount Michigan and go to their next ranked win then 4 out of the 5 are ranked higher than Syracuse and Northwestern

All 5 of them would beat Michigan and Syracuse besides maybe Kentucky against Michigan. The other 4 would easily. Hell Florida just stomped the piss out of Michigan.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

kevwaffles posted...

Corrik posted...

LSU(L) *
Florida*
Kentucky*
Auburn*

Alabama(L)*

All teams better than anyone Notre Dame played.

Why are you comparing them to Georgia in SOS? They play in the SEC. Silly.

The only teams you're right about are the ones that have L's listed after them.

No
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Tag
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

handsomeboy2012 posted...

scarletspeed7 posted...

Corrik posted...

handsomeboy2012 posted...

Meanwhile I still haven't fucked anyone

With a username like that, I can't even fathom why not.

If you think about it, a lot can happen in 6-7 years. handsomeboy may not be a handsomeman. Puberty hits hard.

This account was made when I was 14 which explains the dumb username. Probably going to change it as soon as it's eligible.
I was not exactly a handsomeboy back then and definitely not a handsomeman now.

I mean, I don't think that explains the username at all...
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

LSU(L) *
Florida*
Kentucky*
Auburn*

Alabama(L)*

All teams better than anyone Notre Dame played.

Why are you comparing them to Georgia in SOS? They play in the SEC. Silly.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Her photos started recycling also despite her having an abundance of them. That is usually the beginning of the end.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

ScareChan posted...

Oh we have Lakers on sunday

after they play on saturday

om nom nom

Probably sans LeBron.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

As long as Notre Dame can keep sliding into the Playoff through not being in a conference, they will never join one.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Alabama gains so much just running the ball it is insane. Like 6-7 yards almost every time. No idea why they ever pass.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Well, I am sure many were anti-voting Amo towards the end (I was the last 3 or so matches), but Amo also got pictured out. Look at this taylor girls pictures last match vs this one. Not surprising result.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

eaedwards6400 posted...

Corrik posted...

eaedwards6400 posted...

I don't think Love allows WR to get as open the way the backup did. Julian Love is much better one v one than his back is. Not too mention that was a circus catch to begin with. The guy who that was scored one was Loves backup.

The WR wasn't open. It was perfectly covered and the WR made an amazing catch.

So if you're saying they always get that TD then with Love it is 17-3. Still not a win but a better game.

I'd venture to say if not running out the clock with a lot of backups in the 4th quarter that they could have scored 2 more TDS that quarter easily. They were gashing with the run at that point.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Clemson Alabama next week for the Alabama coronation. Yay. CFB is fun.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

eaedwards6400 posted...

I don't think Love allows WR to get as open the way the backup did. Julian Love is much better one v one than his back is. Not too mention that was a circus catch to begin with. The guy who that was scored one was Loves backup.

The WR wasn't open. It was perfectly covered and the WR made an amazing catch.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

eaedwards6400 posted...

Corrik posted...

eaedwards6400 posted...

I'm not going to pretend that was a close game but listen to this argument. During 3/4 Clemson touchdowns occured while NDs best defensive back was not on the field. With Julian Love out Notre Dame is unable to rusher the passer because now Drue Tranquil now has to help Loves backup. This gives Trevor Lawrence more time and thus gives his guys more time to get open. All of Clemson's touchdowns were 20+ yards. Only one occured while Julian Love was on the field (and that was a run play).

This is the dumbest thing I have heard to justify the loss.

With Julian Love in the game the Irish only gave up 10 points. I'm not saying they would have won the game but I am saying that the game would have been much much closer and naturally would have required the Notre Dame offense to move the ball more. While it is a justification it is just reading the stats.

Dude, how does that player stop the end of half td. There was no help on the play and it was thrown immediately.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Robazoid posted...

Corrik posted...

And I lean in and kiss her and go "to go after what I want"

Ok, this confirms you're feigning guilt so that you don't look bad but you're really just looking for compliments.

Congrats on the sex, in that case.

I actually think most of this might be true until the sex part and part of the banter inside. My major area of concern is.

Corrik posted...

But she doesn't say much about herself the whole time and I'm thinking the whole time something is up.

Coupled with...

Corrik posted...

So finally I go "well I'm afraid to ask, because I think I know the answer, but where is your kid's dad?" And she responds "I'm married"

So she says basically nothing about herself and is only Mrs robinsoning you supposedly yet you know this somehow.

I mean, I believe you made out and got a ride home. But, the very last part of it seems unbelievable and made up. Unless the woman is a legit narcissicist and weird as fuck. Which I doubt because it is too surreal.

But, I mean, if true cool you had sex I guess.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

eaedwards6400 posted...

I'm not going to pretend that was a close game but listen to this argument. During 3/4 Clemson touchdowns occured while NDs best defensive back was not on the field. With Julian Love out Notre Dame is unable to rusher the passer because now Drue Tranquil now has to help Loves backup. This gives Trevor Lawrence more time and thus gives his guys more time to get open. All of Clemson's touchdowns were 20+ yards. Only one occured while Julian Love was on the field (and that was a run play).

This is the dumbest thing I have heard to justify the loss.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Damn they even dunked Gatorade on the cops around Swinney.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Meow1000 posted...

Am I ever going to learn y/n

Notre Dame is awful and if ever in a conference would never even be in a playoff.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

IfGodCouldDie posted...

Corrik posted...

Drakeryn posted...

Corrik posted...

That said, a three year old saying ridiculous things is not a cause for concern. You just want to ignore it at times, very calmly say stuff like "we don't say stuff like that. We love kitties. They are cute! Don't you think so!" and do your best to not make a big deal about it.

This was my thought also. Kids say weird things sometimes. If this is just a singular incident I wouldn't worry about it. Obviously watch her around animals, but you should do that anyway with a three year old.

Yeah, I mean, it is probably even just a stage. I'd give it a few months or so to go away assuming you don't reinforce it somehow.

My son was saying something similar. (Not about cats. It went away. No big deal.

Generally, children that age simply don't even understand what they are saying at that age or what it truly means.

This is very true, and like I said earlier I plan to actually see if she understands what killing is or if it was something she just repeated because my wife used that word.

I honestly wouldn't even try to clarify it with her understanding it or not. No reason to dwell on it and give it more attention than necessary.

But it is up to you.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

IfGodCouldDie posted...

Corrik posted...

Shaduln posted...

Listen to Corrik over the trained therapist, he knows better.

It is literal common sense. Anyone who has any experience in mainstreaming/special education can tell you this.

If the behavior isn't prevalent, it is not a cognitive issue in a child. If it manifests around certain individuals, it is behavioral. Behavioral therapy with the parents where a therapist tells you how to deal with behavior to shape responses and avoid problematic behaviors/responses is a good idea.

Planned ignoring, proper phrasing of questions/ set up of situations, and etc are good things to learn.

One of the biggest issues parents run into is not knowing how to talk to kids.

NO is the last thing you generally want to have to tell a child unless it is something major. Thus, shaping your questions to avoid this response is always best.

For example...

Poorly framed questioning to a kid.

Question: "What would you like for breakfast?"

Answer: "Ice cream and Skittles".

Your Response: "No, you can't have that."

Child gets upset.

This is exactly how you DON'T talk to a child who has a behaviorial issue. Because the child did nothing but answer your question as asked and you responded by telling them no. Why did you even ask the question then if their response wouldn't be allowed?

Better question

Question: "Would you like eggs for breakfast?"

Answer: "No, I hate eggs"

Response: "How about cereal? You can have cereal or eggs if you are hungry. If not, and you get hungry later let me know and I will get you one of those".

Learning how to not lead conversations to "no" and misdirecting conversations to answers you find acceptable is one of the key things most parents lack the training on and it can handle many situations.

This can help with behavioral issues

That said, a three year old saying ridiculous things is not a cause for concern. You just want to ignore it at times, very calmly say stuff like "we don't say stuff like that. We love kitties. They are cute! Don't you think so!" and do your best to not make a big deal about it. Some kids will do things purposely just for attention from a parent. If you make a big deal to bad behavior, you reinforce doing bad things to get that attention.

While I agree with this, whole heartedly. The sensory processing is something that tends to be quite prevalent when she is in relaxed environments. They tend to come out more when she is comfortable in a scenario and are less prevalent when she is distracted. There are also times when sound, light and things touching her do set off irrational responses.

I am not saying she doesn't have that. There is obviously details we are not privy to regarding her. I am referring to the acts up for us solely but is an angel for everyone else to the point no one believes us stuff. That specifically is behaviorial.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Drakeryn posted...

Corrik posted...

That said, a three year old saying ridiculous things is not a cause for concern. You just want to ignore it at times, very calmly say stuff like "we don't say stuff like that. We love kitties. They are cute! Don't you think so!" and do your best to not make a big deal about it.

This was my thought also. Kids say weird things sometimes. If this is just a singular incident I wouldn't worry about it. Obviously watch her around animals, but you should do that anyway with a three year old.

Yeah, I mean, it is probably even just a stage. I'd give it a few months or so to go away assuming you don't reinforce it somehow.

My son was saying something similar. (Not about cats. It went away. No big deal.

Generally, children that age simply don't even understand what they are saying at that age or what it truly means.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Shaduln posted...

Listen to Corrik over the trained therapist, he knows better.

It is literal common sense. Anyone who has any experience in mainstreaming/special education can tell you this.

If the behavior isn't prevalent, it is not a cognitive issue in a child. If it manifests around certain individuals, it is behavioral. Behavioral therapy with the parents where a therapist tells you how to deal with behavior to shape responses and avoid problematic behaviors/responses is a good idea.

Planned ignoring, proper phrasing of questions/ set up of situations, and etc are good things to learn.

One of the biggest issues parents run into is not knowing how to talk to kids.

NO is the last thing you generally want to have to tell a child unless it is something major. Thus, shaping your questions to avoid this response is always best.

For example...

Poorly framed questioning to a kid.

Question: "What would you like for breakfast?"

Answer: "Ice cream and Skittles".

Your Response: "No, you can't have that."

Child gets upset.

This is exactly how you DON'T talk to a child who has a behaviorial issue. Because the child did nothing but answer your question as asked and you responded by telling them no. Why did you even ask the question then if their response wouldn't be allowed?

Better question

Question: "Would you like eggs for breakfast?"

Answer: "No, I hate eggs"

Response: "How about cereal? You can have cereal or eggs if you are hungry. If not, and you get hungry later let me know and I will get you one of those".

Learning how to not lead conversations to "no" and misdirecting conversations to answers you find acceptable is one of the key things most parents lack the training on and it can handle many situations.

This can help with behavioral issues

That said, a three year old saying ridiculous things is not a cause for concern. You just want to ignore it at times, very calmly say stuff like "we don't say stuff like that. We love kitties. They are cute! Don't you think so!" and do your best to not make a big deal about it. Some kids will do things purposely just for attention from a parent. If you make a big deal to bad behavior, you reinforce doing bad things to get that attention.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

IfGodCouldDie posted...

TexasZea posted...

take her to a therapist, don't take advice from board 8

I'm not soley taking advice from B8, this was more of a blogfaqs and she has a therapist already, the problem is she exhibits no bad behaviours when not in our care making it look like we make things up. She has been diagnosed with sensory processing disorder but will only exhibit the behaviours when no one is around. The only reason she even got the diagnosis is because her occupational therapist did home visits and after months of coming over and seeing a perfect little angel there was one day when is was in full on meltdown mode. After seeing it her therapist was like, "Whoa."

That isn't a cognitive disorder. That is behaviorial. She only acts up around yinz because she trusts and loves you so much that she feels no matter what she does you will still love her regardless.

Likely from either over nurturing or lack of authority/discipline.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Just a stage. Wouldn't give two shits regarding it. Brain isn't even formed.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

TheRock1525 posted...

What I shared with my friend:

She literally saw I was sitting by myself at a bar and was like "why don't you come sit over here with me and my mom?" And about 10 minutes in her mom leaves.

So whatever I don't think much of it and then she spends the next two hours basically verbally undressing me

"You're really shy and bashful aren't you?" "Why do I make you so nervous?" "You've been hurt by women in your previous relationships?" Etc

But she doesn't say much about herself the whole time and I'm thinking the whole time something is up.

She finally goes "you know how you can tell how I'm feeling? Look at my mouth." And she's kind biting down on her thumb and goes "what do you think this means?" And I start stammering and she goes "really? Alright." So finally I go "well I'm afraid to ask, because I think I know the answer, but where is your kid's dad?" And she responds "I'm married"

She starts talking about how he doesn't feel anything for him, how they came to this exact same bar a week ago and no one in the bar even thought they were together

We finish our drinks and she says she's cold and wants to go outside so we sit outside and just listen to the drunk people when suddenly she pulls me in and starts kissing me. And we're making out outside the bar where she just explained the owner's son is best friends with her husband and he can literally see us. Eventually she goes "you should bring your bike over to my car, and I'll give you a ride." So its about 2:30 am at this point and I walk my bike over to her car a block away, and we start kissing again and I realize why she wants to give me a ride when she says he's gone this weekend with the kids, but I agree to the ride home and sure enough we end up at her place instead of mine and I make no objections.

Come into her place and there's not much talking. She said she loves kissing more than anything and we keep making out where I was actually complimented for the first time about that in my life. I always thought I was average or nothing special because I never got complemented.

After we did the deeds she hugs me and goes "so what did you learn tonight" "I don't know" "OMG I've failed as a teacher" so she leans in again and says "no, seriously what did you learn tonight?" And I lean in and kiss her and go "to go after what I want" and she responds "do you want me?" And the only smart ass answer I have is "should I?" So she smiles and hugs me and says "I hope you text me" and we part ways

This story is either bullshit or the lady sounds like a psycho.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

handsomeboy2012 posted...

Meanwhile I still haven't fucked anyone

With a username like that, I can't even fathom why not.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

If you pursued it, you are a piece of shit. If she was entirely the pursuer, you did nothing wrong.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Suprak the Stud posted...

Whoa I won. I'd like to apologize to the better teams I beat along the way. I got lucky at the end and managed to pick up all the late season workhorses. I think I actually benefitted from having a less good team than I have had in past seasons, because it forced me to stay diligent on the waiver wire. Also, hooray for Nick Foles replacing Wentz and winning both a Super Bowl and Fantasy championship now.

I'd like to thank everyone who signed up! I'll see all of you next year. Hopefully.

Fuck yahoo
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Tag
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

I used to be Parks but now im The Office

Why did you switch? Just finally watched the office?
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

He doesn't always get them up daily.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Who you got?
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

MetalmindStats posted...

Corrik posted...

15:17 to Paris

The Commuter

Corrik posted...

The Girl on the Train

I don't think any of those are actually about trains, though?

15:17 to Paris and The Commuter are moreso about trains than source code is.

Now, Girl on the Train is probably a tad less about trains than Source Code.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

The Girl on the Train
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0205461/videoplayer/vi150405401?ref_=tt_ov_vi

Thomas and the Magic Railroad.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

15:17 to Paris

The Commuter
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9mR2hLbPMg&feature=youtu.be
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Snakes on a Train.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

StealThisSheen posted...

Maybe Trump himself isn't sure if Santa's real or not and is trying to get insight from others, so that he knows if he needs to build a wall to the north or not to keep that illegal out.

Isn't he denying global warming specifically to drown him?
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

No
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

LOLIAmAnAlt posted...

Stories?

I once asked a guy at a Gamestop if I could buy a Forza case. He just gave it to me and said to have a good day.

Another time I had shown slight disdain about a sticker mark so without even asking he took me over the the Wii U section and found a nicer case then took the time to pretty that one up.

When I was in another used game shop, they had a section that sold just manuals and cases separately. They also sold full games with and without the original art. I just needed a case/manual to a PS1 game and asked to buy just that and not the game. The guy working there basically told me to shove it. All the shops of that local chain are closed now.

Trolling.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Persona 5
Xcom 2 Collection
Dark Souls Remastered

Like 10 4k movies.

2 Under armour hoodies
1 UNC shirt
Gym bag

Book The Outsider and the book Revival
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

Jakyl25 posted...

Trump says there are no plans to bring any troops home from Iraq

= /
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

UltimaterializerX posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

Trump isnt letting Mattis serve out his last two months he planned to

Government shutdown is ongoing because Trump demands funding for the wall before hell sign the budget

Good. Mattis wanted endless wars in the Middle East and home defense should be a priority of any sovereign nation.

I liked Mattis. But, he maybe is better overseeing the military itself and not the foreign policy dictating what the military does abroad.

Idk it is tough to say. I liked Mattis, and I like bringing the troops home
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

My girls kid scratched half the code off the strip for the online for his Nintendo. I tried calling and texting Nintendo. No response. Closed. Opened a ticket. Took screenshots as requested in ticket of card both sides. Didn't have a receipt due to online transaction on guest account and length since purchase. Took a picture of best buy asking me to review my purchase.

They emailed me like 1.5 hours later and said they added it to my account and it was taken care of. Surprised by the quick response and lack of a hassle to be quite honest. Good job.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

NFUN posted...

laws arent inherently moral

They don't have to be. It is how you carry yourself while your accordance or not of the law.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik

No idea how you guys don't understand lawful/chaotic in terms of good/evil.
---

LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik