LogFAQs > #1196433

LurkerFAQs ( 06.29.2011-09.11.2012 ), Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicRate the Pokemon Day 86: Sigilyph
WickIebee
05/29/12 5:25:00 PM
#16:


Sigilyph: 4.3/10 A rip-off of the Natu family, but still one of the few Pokes I actually debated on using in Gen V. Other choices were either "Yes," "I might as well," "No" or a few other different words that I shouldn't go off on. Either way, this was one of the few that took me a while thinking.

Now for some past families.

Drillbur: 6.7/10
Excadrill: 9.4/10 Kind of a cool concept, especially those Special Abilities.

Cubone: 4.4/10
Marowak: 7.8/10 The family that made a mark on those that watched the series, and the first Poke family to have weapons that isn't just a forgettable waste of space.

Machop: 4.5/10
Machoke: 5.9/10
Machamp: 8.8/10 The four-armed man I wouldn't want to fight myself. Fighting type was once great, but never had much of a use in any gen save for dual-types and/or the Hitmons with elemental strikes in Gen 1. An awesome looking Poke, but still underclassed thanks to only being Fighting, and not a dual-type compared to much better Fighting-types.

--
Official Pidgeot of the B/W Boards Clan
Quite frankly my Deerling, I don't give a Wormadam- GenesisSaga
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1