I sometimes wonder.
Like, as much as I don't want to be a holocaust denier or whatever, the whole thing just seems kind of "convenient".
I just feel like it's too..."movie-like", y'know? History is written by the victor as has been said in this topic, and it seems very convenient that in one of the greatest conflicts in human history, the guy who lost just so happened to also be the most evil person ever, or something. It makes the actions of the allies seem "right".
It's kind of a vague, unformed thought in my mind because I don't necessarily think Hitler didn't do these things, but the whole thing seems to have been painted like "the good guys won", and real-life is rarely ever that black-and-white.
Considering the allies with their "right" actions completely obliterated two cities right after they defeated "the most evil person" ever I wouldn't really call them angels or depicted as such in history
Sometimes things seem iffy and I'm a person that 'thinks for himself' (really who doesn't? just because you're a rational person doesn't give you the right to believe in far fetched conspiracy theories. not that I'm accusing you of this XIII, far from it even), but considering Hitler really didn't shy away from hating Jews and other "different" people and there's factual evidence all over the place this seems like a no-brainer
--
http://i.imgur.com/jyFl2.png