couldn't she also not name a court decision she disagreed with? it's all vague in my memory now, but I do seem to recall some pretty basic questions she failed that any candidate would've been asked and no amount of editing could've fixed.
The editing comes from the fact that they did about five hours worth of interviewing and cherry-picked the worst fifteen minutes of it. They didn't air ANY of her responses on her stronger issues, and only aired the attack questions intentionally designed to look dumb.
Yeah, she helped them by providing 15 minutes worth of dumb material, but it's still dishonest and wrong.
--
SmartMuffin - Because anything less would be uncivilized
http://img.imgcake.com/gadsdenflaggifda.gif