I don't people care that much about Barkley. They care more about the arguments from the side opposing Barkley being godawful. At least that's how I feel.
I only read the first 100 posts or so, but I think this is roughly my opinion. I think the decision to exclude them is defensible itself, it's just Bacon seemed to elect to choose the worst possible reasons to defend it with.
--
xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out?
GotD (219/384) Melee v FFX