From: Mershaaay | Posted: 10/5/2011 5:14:25 PM | #153
TimJab posted...
(although i don't think i've ever met a mets/giants fan)
This is the common pairing where I grew up.
No one is masochistic enough to like the Mets and the Jets at the same time.
i see a bit of it
From: ExThaNemesis | Posted: 10/5/2011 5:25:26 PM | #163
I guess I just don't see why my sports choices are so incredibly unreasonable and I'm some ultimate bandwagoning failure of a sports fan.
Like literally you are using me still cheering for the St. Louis Rams as evidence of me being a bad sports fan. I'm sorry if I can't follow this.
no im not. It's the fact that you say you love the rams yet foolishly would cheer for their arch rival in the superbowl because you have some chilidish hate for the steeler fans (who are the same fans your beloved penguins have btw. I'd venture a HIIIGHHH percent)
the same way you admitted earlier this year you'd cheer for the sox over the phils if that was the WS. don't deny it, you said it 15 times at least. That's TERRIBLE sports attitude. You never cheer for the arch rival because you have some misplaced hate. I hate philly too. I hate that city with such a passion but still, they're NOT our rivals. How does this not make you a tiny bit bad is beyond me. It's terrible logic. I'm not 100% right on everyone having to stick to an arbitrary line of sports fandom based on location, but at least have some consistency if you're going to deviate. You don't, as evidenced up above. How on EARTH do you cheer for the Sox over the Phils in that situation. HOW
--
*~The Swiftuation~*