LogFAQs > #978687141

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Trump Trials General Part 7
ThePieReborn 02/06/24 11:42:14 AM #107:	RchHomieQuanChi posted... I just don't see what the SCOTUS has to gain from protecting Trump at this point. Their positions are already locked in for life. I'm thinking MAYBE they fear violence from Trumpers, but haven't they already ruled against him before? Yep, SCOTUS ruled against him in Vance (not related to JD Vance). --- Party leader, passive-aggressive doormat, pasta eater extraordinaire! <cite>ThePieReborn posted [p:978687141] in Trump Tria... [t:80685994]...</cite> <quote>RchHomieQuanChi posted... </cite><quote>I just don't see what the SCOTUS has to gain from protecting Trump at this point. Their positions are already locked in for life.I'm thinking MAYBE they fear violence from Trumpers, but haven't they already ruled against him before?</quote>Yep, SCOTUS ruled against him in Vance (not related to JD Vance). --- Party leader, passive-aggressive doormat, pasta eater extraordinaire!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1