LogFAQs > #978774952

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Should there be a max age for president?
EPR-radar 02/11/24 12:26:13 AM #33:	JuanCarlos1 posted... Lol at that moral high horse. Its not arbitrary. There are physiological reasons why we impose age restrictions for certain activities. The most important position of the country should be held to the highest standard possible. Any specific number for age is arbitrary. And LOL at standards. The US just had a president scraped out of a cesspit of Satan, and may well end up with that jackass again, since it seems to be perfectly legal for traitorous insurrectionists (R) to run for the presidency or for seats in Congress. --- "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -- 1984 <cite>EPR-radar posted [p:978774952] in Should the... [t:80693628]...</cite> <quote>JuanCarlos1 posted... </cite><quote>Lol at that moral high horse. Its not arbitrary. There are physiological reasons why we impose age restrictions for certain activities. The most important position of the country should be held to the highest standard possible.</quote>Any specific number for age is arbitrary.And LOL at standards. The US just had a president scraped out of a cesspit of Satan, and may well end up with that jackass again, since it seems to be perfectly legal for traitorous insurrectionists (R) to run for the presidency or for seats in Congress. --- "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -- 1984</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1