LogFAQs > #978780985

Cynrascal posted...

There are also prompts created to mimic other actual artists as well. This goes beyond just "creating". There is a difference between being inspired by an artist and straight doing the equivalent of a Chinese bootleg in picture form.

I'm sure there are scores of human made art made to replicate the styles ofnfamous artists though. I don't think an artist owns a style really. It's only a bootleg if you present the AI art as a genuine piece as a work by that artist.

SSJKirby posted...

Humans bring their own perspective into it, they can see one piece of art and get inspired and make something unique. Humans can learn and observe and grow and have their perspective change.

AI Art is just fancy auto-complete, and AI Training is giving it a bigger pool to pull from. And again the issue is people's work are being taken to build these databases, charging money for it in some cases, and the artists aren't being compensated.

So it's more about the use in training vs the 'stealing'? Some humans artists also make purely derivivate works too though.

Calling it auto complete seems too simplistic when it's using aspects of 1000 works to create a novel work. If I draw a Mona Lisa inspired work and people buy it, should I have to compensate da Vinci's estate?