LogFAQs > #979014028

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicIt seems like Vince McMahon had some kind of a cult-like grip on some people.
-Crissaegrim-
02/24/24 3:48:37 AM
#31:


Crazyman93 posted...
I saw a thing claiming that Nash had said because of his relationship with WWE, he couldn't attend Sting's retirement match in AEW at all, even in the audience. I'm not sure what his role there is, if at all, and don't feel like looking it up, but Nash has always had a reputation for backstage politics. I honestly wouldn't be shocked if he's hedging his bets on this, just in case Vince somehow manages to worm out of this and make it back into WWE. I don't think that will happen, but it's also not my job on the line if I call Vince McMahon a piece of shit and he gets back into WWE. Figure that Nash is probably thinking about the steroid scandal and working under a "he beat that somehow, so he could beat this too" logic.

If you're not a victim of the abuse, but could get royally fucked trying to fight the legal storm that breaking the NDA would cause? I don't know Nash's financials, but he could well not have the money to defend himself in court. And well, moral victories don't pay your mortgage.

Wouldn't be that much of a risk to him to shut his fucking mouth and not publically criticise the alleged victim or make 'nDa 4 Life' merch.

---
Brains for dinner, brains for lunch, brains for breakfast
Brains for brunch, brains at every single meal, why can't we have some guts?
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1