I can't disagree those are interesting statements. I went back to get the post that has been nagging me since end of day 1 and found this post quoted above - t3p352. I'm struggling to find the context for what Peaf meant by this?
this is the post that was nagging me. it's been tucked away corner of my brain since the end of d1, even though it was before peaf claimed. t3p314. i didn't bring it up yesterday because i didn't want to add more conjecture to the eod d1 dumpster fire of a discussion last day. it's been sitting in the back of my brain saying 'peaf basically said out loud that something went wrong - but what?'. whether it has an implication for kirby i'm not sure but it's the only thing keeping the door open for EoD d1ers possibly being scumbuddies with peaf in my brain.
Chaeix posted...
kirby i can't say that i didn't have this same thought.
kind of reads like peaf took your acceptance for granted and expected it. why leave if he's not certain you'll accept?
Chaeix posted...
well at the very least you've convinced me that if there is scum at EoD d1 it's probably kirby and not dumey?
i don't think it's too much of a stretch to say that dumey could have paired up with peaf again without too much suspicion until a possible peaf flip later in the game. in this setup i feel like the scum incentive to save a buddy (particularly role cop) is
i'll note that the post that's been nagging me was made after FD broke up to steal Kirby away
---
No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love!