LogFAQs > #979576735

GranAures posted...

You may not want to anchor it, but the people you clap along for absolutely have the record to try. Or do you think they'll just stop there despite actively attacking material concerning the LGBTQ+ community as pornographic, drag as pornographic, etc. purely because you don't want it? Reminder that numerous books have been banned by states run by people like Abbot purely because they have LGBTQ+ characters and themes which have had those books attacked as porn. Any site that sold those books would then be distributing porn to children(oh my, how dare) in those states thereby limiting access to LGBTQ+ positive media for LGBTQ+ children. Your inability to assess who is pushing for these laws and the type of people they are while cheering on their goals is a you problem.

But sure, let's trust them to have the best interest of children in mind while they actively do nothing about the actual threats to children they allow to persist while they push for their additional control.

Classifying non porn as porn is an issue that absolutely needs addressed. We agree on that. I don't personally believe that gives justification for companies to provide adult material to minors, and that's okay.