LogFAQs > #979754106

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	In 1917, why didn't the guy just run in the back?
IdiotMachine 04/05/24 7:43:54 PM #5:	Hospy posted... I vaguely recall that he didnt have much time to get the message delivered and that was the shortest way to get there. Running on the left vs. running on the right is the same... except for this fact that wasn't shown in the movie, which makes sense why he went left: havean776 posted... In real trenches the back would of had a high support to help camouflage soldiers peeking over. This would of made it very hard to climb over where as the front is designed to be climbed quickly. --- https://i.imgur.com/XNEdLrJ.png <cite>IdiotMachine posted [p:979754106] in In 1917, w... [t:80740019]...</cite> <quote>Hospy posted... </cite><quote>I vaguely recall that he didnt have much time to get the message delivered and that was the shortest way to get there.</quote>Running on the left vs. running on the right is the same... except for this fact that wasn't shown in the movie, which makes sense why he went left:havean776 posted... </cite><quote>In real trenches the back would of had a high support to help camouflage soldiers peeking over. This would of made it very hard to climb over where as the front is designed to be climbed quickly.</quote> --- https://i.imgur.com/XNEdLrJ.png</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1