LogFAQs > #979784491

emblem-man posted...

People generally live where jobs exist. I'm fine if you think we should incentivise more companies to do remote work or open up more branches in smaller towns. The thing is, that still requires housing to be built in those smaller towns so I'm that priced don't increase.

We should also build housing in large cities because obviously some companies and people want to be in those cities.

I'm for building housing everywhere. That's the difference between me and I guess you.

Both require large amounts of work in terms of either

To be clear, my position is as you highlighted above. It isn't just about building housing, but also bringing in industry and all those other things that will make other locations more desirable and more sustainable.

But I think you will see the cost of living in the city go down as it becomes more appealing to live other places, which is also why I think we need to prioritize population distribution through investment before we continue to try and shove more and more people into areas that, truthfully, are saturated.