LogFAQs > #980165780

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Community Mafia Topic 2 - The Psychology of Fake Claiming
wallmasterz 04/30/24 4:31:48 AM #41:	htaeD posted... On the other hand I dont really have much problems with that Wallz post everyone keeps mentioning (51, topic 1) It has an acceptable level of snark for a post thats still near the first page. I especially dont know why MI calls it Wallz 'inserting himself into the discussion' when Wallz was answering a question posed to everyone. I think I know what MI meant but its probably better for them to answer in their own words. It didnt seem scummy to me though. htaeD posted... Though I will add that I myself dont find Sbell at all unlikable enough to warrant such a comment. But thats just me. Theres nothing unlikable about sbell. Ever since I neighbored sbell in your Bloodborne game, were kinda buddies. He and I have been playfully giving each other a hard time over nothing ever since. I dont think any of the players who had an overkill reaction to 1.51 (Blade, MI primarily come to mind) really understand this, which is why I didnt attribute scum motives. It was a joke post barely removed from t1p1 taken far too seriously regardless of Blade and MIs alignment. Ben is the one player who claimed to pick up scum vibes from me that I would expect to potentially know better when it comes to sbell and I lovingly throwing shade each others way. --- I need to update my signature. <cite>wallmasterz posted [p:980165780] in Community ... [t:80758783]...</cite> <quote>htaeD posted... </cite><quote>On the other hand I dont really have much problems with that Wallz post everyone keeps mentioning (51, topic 1)It has an acceptable level of snark for a post thats still near the first page.I especially dont know why MI calls it Wallz 'inserting himself into the discussion' when Wallz was answering a question posed to everyone.</quote>I think I know what MI meant but its probably better for them to answer in their own words. It didnt seem scummy to me though.htaeD posted... </cite><quote>Though I will add that I myself dont find Sbell at all unlikable enough to warrant such a comment. But thats just me.</quote>Theres nothing unlikable about sbell. Ever since I neighbored sbell in your Bloodborne game, were kinda buddies. He and I have been playfully giving each other a hard time over nothing ever since. I dont think any of the players who had an overkill reaction to 1.51 (Blade, MI primarily come to mind) really understand this, which is why I didnt attribute scum motives. It was a joke post barely removed from t1p1 taken far too seriously regardless of Blade and MIs alignment. Ben is the one player who claimed to pick up scum vibes from me that I would expect to potentially know better when it comes to sbell and I lovingly throwing shade each others way. --- I need to update my signature.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1