LogFAQs > #980172812

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	SC declines to block enforcement of age-verification requirements for porn sites
ButteryMales 04/30/24 2:52:56 PM #65:	shockthemonkey posted... In a topic about a Supreme Court ruling, I pointed out that no one is discussing the actual ruling or the grounds that the laws were contested on. What's to discuss? The Supreme Court offered no explanation for its decision Tuesday, common for decisions on its emergency docket. There were no noted dissents. Hopefully, it's because it's not an emergency. Not because our right to privacy and our right to be protected from illegal search is dead. <cite>ButteryMales posted [p:980172812] in SC decline... [t:80759244]...</cite> <quote>shockthemonkey posted...</cite><quote>In a topic about a Supreme Court ruling, I pointed out that no one is discussing the actual ruling or the grounds that the laws were contested on.</quote>What's to discuss?<quote>The Supreme Court offered no explanation for its decision Tuesday, common for decisions on its emergency docket. There were no noted dissents.</quote>Hopefully, it's because it's not an emergency. Not because our right to privacy and our right to be protected from illegal search is dead.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1