LogFAQs > #980173255

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicSC declines to block enforcement of age-verification requirements for porn sites
havean776
04/30/24 3:21:10 PM
#92:


[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


It is yet Breechs still happen and all the time.

Why should it rather fall on the government to not enforce their laws on pornography being illegal to obtain and view for minors? The arguments against requiring age verification regularly boil down to I dont care if minors are watching porn, in which case Id rather just see people outright admit they think there shouldnt be age laws requiring porn viewing because otherwise it feels like people are just finding long winded ways of saying I dont want to be inconvenienced when Im trying to watch porn.
Because they have proven woefully bad at securing it. Because porn is a very private thing and can easily be used to blackmail or ruin someones reputation. Adults are capabel of child locking thier devices. We have more options for safe browsing than evr before. Yet people still claim think about the children.

I dont think simply saying what if theres a data breach is what most people are actually worried about and it wasnt even the legal argument being made in the case that this topic is about.
It is what I am arguing. Why demand age verification when it has a history of being easily breeched?

You constantly down play how damaging data breeching is. People lose money, time and identiy because of it. So I need a better reason to demand it than "a child might see boobies!"

---
"I will either find a way, or make one."
Hannibal Barca
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1