Weird how two people immediately chimed in with the word "stereotype". Very bizarre. I know a lot about dog breeds in general, so I know what I'm talking about. And I'm a proud owner of a German Shepherd (the best dogs, in my opinion, with Golden Retrievers a runner up).
Also, I'm not going by "stereotypes", that's an odd word to use when referring to dogs. I'm going by statistics. You can look up the stats for dog attacks. Pit Bulls attack and kill humans more than any other dog breed, followed by Rottweilers being the second deadliest dog. German Shepherds are the 3rd most dangerous dog, but they are a DISTANT 3rd after Pit Bulls and Rottweilers. So no "stereotypes" involved here. These are stats tracked over a very long period of time for these breeds, so this is accurate information about which dogs are the most dangerous in general, and which ones are prone to random attacks. When it comes to random, unprovoked attacks, Pit Bulls are the clear winner, and everyone knows this.
Anyway, yes, it's possible that a Husky randomly attacked a baby. But unlikely. If it were a Pit Bull though, no one would be surprised.
Labradors are better than German Shepherds, Rottweilers, and Pit Bulls in nearly every way.