LogFAQs > #980797370

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	UK Election Debate
ai123 06/11/24 10:25:04 AM #15:	SHRlKE posted... I agree. Problem is there were in a coalition. As a minority member. Compromises have to made. No one take about the fact they managed to push through 60% of their manifesto during the same period. They didn't have to form a coalition with the fucking Tories. A Lab/Lib/SNP coalition was viable. Or they could have given the electorate another go to sort it out. The percentage doesn't mean much when they were given fixed term parliaments (since junked by Johnson) and Health Boards, while their key policies got trashed (the gimped PR referendum), and they ended up giving us Cameron and, by extension, Brexit. I find it really difficult to vote for them, based on that. --- 'Vinyl is the poor man's art collection'. <cite>ai123 posted [p:980797370] in UK Electio... [t:80784791]...</cite> <quote>SHRlKE posted... </cite><quote>I agree. Problem is there were in a coalition. As a minority member. Compromises have to made. No one take about the fact they managed to push through 60% of their manifesto during the same period.</quote>They didn't have to form a coalition with the fucking Tories. A Lab/Lib/SNP coalition was viable. Or they could have given the electorate another go to sort it out.The percentage doesn't mean much when they were given fixed term parliaments (since junked by Johnson) and Health Boards, while their key policies got trashed (the gimped PR referendum), and they ended up giving us Cameron and, by extension, Brexit.I find it really difficult to vote for them, based on that. --- 'Vinyl is the poor man's art collection'.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1