LogFAQs > #983884094

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Angry Joe is absolutely furious about Star Trek: Section 31 (Spoilers I guess)
pegusus123456 02/01/25 1:32:43 AM #25:	AceMos posted... section 31 is a thing the creators clearly did not get from DS9 they only work as a foil to bashir the ethical debate they raise is a good one but they should never be the focus of star trek Yeah, I think they're meant to be seen as a failure of the Federation. Not praised as a necessary evil. --- https://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif https://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif https://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif So? I deeded to some gay porn. It doesn't mean anything. - Patty_Fleur <cite>pegusus123456 posted [p:983884094] in Angry Joe ... [t:80925890]...</cite> <quote>AceMos posted... </cite><quote>section 31 is a thing the creators clearly did not get from DS9they only work as a foil to bashir the ethical debate they raise is a good one but they should never be the focus of star trek</quote>Yeah, I think they're meant to be seen as a failure of the Federation.Not praised as a necessary evil. --- https://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif https://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif https://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gifSo? I deeded to some gay porn. It doesn't mean anything. - Patty_Fleur</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1