LogFAQs > #984263551

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Should Pluto regain its planetary status?
ReturnOfFa 03/05/25 8:35:00 PM #45:	Salrite posted... Really? The only qualification between Planet and Moon is size? What the fuck kind of qualification is that? Does it orbit a star? It's a planet. Does it orbit another celestial body? It's a moon. It should be as simple as that. Size is irrelevant. eh, the categorization he employs is more logical. unfortunately, when we create categories, there are inherently going to be those 'fuzzy' edge cases. it feels arbitrary because it is, but there needs to be a place where the line is drawn otherwise we're going to be qualifying trillions of objects as planets based on your criteria. --- girls like my fa <cite>ReturnOfFa posted [p:984263551] in Should Plu... [t:80942146]...</cite> <quote>Salrite posted... </cite><quote>Really? The only qualification between Planet and Moon is size? What the fuck kind of qualification is that?Does it orbit a star? It's a planet.Does it orbit another celestial body? It's a moon.It should be as simple as that. Size is irrelevant.</quote>eh, the categorization he employs is more logical. unfortunately, when we create categories, there are inherently going to be those 'fuzzy' edge cases. it feels arbitrary because it is, but there needs to be a place where the line is drawn otherwise we're going to be qualifying trillions of objects as planets based on your criteria. --- girls like my fa</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1