There are a lot of little things like that which, individually, are kind of weird, but all at once, people should be way more suspicious about it than they are.
There was Trump talking at I think one of his last rallies before the election about how he and Mike Johnson had a "little secret" that made him absolutely confident he was gonna win. Then the one I think we all know, where Trump said something to the effect of "Elon really knows those voting machines", and whatever the heck *that* was supposed to mean. I also remember my cousin showing me a clip in January with Trump speaking at some rally, telling a story about how, "I won't be at the Olympics, I won't be president, but then they rigged it so now I'll be there". Like, literally said the phrase "they rigged it", not specific as to *who* rigged *what* but we can draw our own conclusions.
That's why I'm bothered by the people talking about, "You really think he wouldn't have said anything?" Wtf do you mean? He *is* saying things. His handlers probably panic on the regular because he keeps almost full-on spilling the beans. And not just him, either. During that little almost breakup he and Elon had, Elon posted a *very* suggestive tweet about how close it was and how Trump won thanks to him. You gotta wonder, what *exactly* did Elon do to help Trump win?
Of course, this is not evidence. But one thing certain posters don't seem to grasp is that the evidence (or lack thereof) is the *result* of an investigation, not the *prerequisite* to one. The only thing you need to justify an investigation is reasonable suspicion that there's something to investigate, and we had that in spades *without* Trump struggling not to confess on national TV.
I've been saying shit like this for months.
---
How can the moon landing be real if the moon isn't real?