| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Trump admin bans trans athlete visas in a 'win for common sense' |
| Link_of_time 08/05/25 9:45:19 PM #36: | DrizztLink posted... Because the burden of proof is on the claim.Wouldn't asking for inclusion in established Women's sports, be akin to stating that there is no advantage over biological female athlete's? Thus trans-women are making the claim there is no advantage due to their sex. Women's sports already makes it clear, by its existence, that there is a clear biological difference between Male and Female athletes. MC_BatCommander posted... No. Burden of proof is on the people making the claim.Actually the default position of the "original party" is that sports are divided by sex due to biological differences between the sexes, with males having physical advantage over females. The introduction of trans-athletes makes the claim there are no differences and thus no advantages. El_Dustino posted... Women's sports were established to be played by... women. Which trans women are. Sounds like a flawed attempt at an argument.I've never hid my opinions on trans issues. My only concern is finding the facts. This has been made extremely difficult as most ppl today will allow their biases to lead them to their own desired outcomes. If you must know, I believe trans-women do have a base advantage over female athletes. What I really want to know is if this "advantage" is within acceptable tolerance akin to female athletes who have naturally occurring advantages, such as height or high-T. If it is not, can it truly be mitigated? If not by the current standards, then by what efforts would make the trans-athletes in-question acceptable, indisputably? ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |