LogFAQs > #986569573

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Clarence Thomas says precedent might not determine cases on upcoming docket
jefffan 09/29/25 10:04:52 AM #50:	CARRRNE_ASADA posted... Like is there a possibility that somebody will contest interracial marriage and appeal to the SC? That would be something Well I didn't think gay marriage would be eliminated but here we are. Racists are panicking over the drop in white babies. That's where the whole "white replacement theory" comes from. Get it outlawed? Bam! More white babies! That's how they think. --- The Bill of Rights should be for everyone... except it isnt <cite>jefffan posted [p:986569573] in Clarence T... [t:81047760]...</cite> <quote>CARRRNE_ASADA posted... </cite><quote>Like is there a possibility that somebody will contest interracial marriage and appeal to the SC? That would be something</quote>Well I didn't think gay marriage would be eliminated but here we are.Racists are panicking over the drop in white babies. That's where the whole "white replacement theory" comes from. Get it outlawed? Bam! More white babies!That's how they think. --- The Bill of Rights should be for everyone... except it isnt</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1