LogFAQs > #875576382

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Fire emblem conquest is too difficult
Mac Arrowny 03/21/17 3:02:10 PM #30:	Paratroopa1 posted... Well the problem for me is that generally the maps are balanced around the idea that you should be able to win without losing any characters - I honestly can't even imagine not being able to clear a map without losing all my characters on anything less than lunatic (lunatic casual is sorta fun). Like I don't even know how you don't win if you can just throw all your units head-on into the fray without worrying about losing them. My goal is usually to get as much support levels between the characters as possible, so even on casual it can be challenging, and I've redone battles several times because characters died when I was trying to get more support for them. --- All the stars in the sky are waiting for you. <cite>Mac Arrowny posted [p:875576382] in Fire emble... [t:75138444]...</cite> <quote><cite>Paratroopa1 posted...</cite> <quote> Well the problem for me is that generally the maps are balanced around the idea that you should be able to win without losing any characters - I honestly can't even imagine not being able to clear a map without losing all my characters on anything less than lunatic (lunatic casual is sorta fun). Like I don't even know how you don't win if you can just throw all your units head-on into the fray without worrying about losing them. </quote> My goal is usually to get as much support levels between the characters as possible, so even on casual it can be challenging, and I've redone battles several times because characters died when I was trying to get more support for them. --- All the stars in the sky are waiting for you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1