LogFAQs > #875626979

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicFire emblem conquest is too difficult
NeoElfboy
03/22/17 9:19:46 AM
#37:


Panthera posted...
MariaTaylor posted...
I can't speak for the rest of board 8 but I've always hated Awakening. I actually specifically bought a 3DS to play Awakening and EO4, and I was incredibly disappointed by both games. rather than go on a rant about all the things I dislike about FE:A, I'll just leave it at that. it was so bad that it actually made me quit the series for quite some time.


I don't hate Awakening but it's definitely one of the weaker games in the series. It has just enough of the standard Fire Emblem experience for me to like it, but it failed at basically everything other than "be a Fire Emblem game"


Yeah I can certainly see this.

I prefer Awakening to the oldest games in the series (pre-7 probably, pre-6 for sure, as well as FE11-12) because it lacks a lot of their weird clunkiness (like being unable to shop for a while or having large empty parts of maps) and is generally more aesthetically appealing... but gameplaywise it's a bit poorly balanced and lacking map design compared to most.

These flaws are very much fixed by Conquest at least (and the rest of Fates to a lesser extent).
---
The RPG Duelling League: www.rpgdl.com
An unparalleled source for RPG information and discussion
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1