LogFAQs > #876260649

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicThree teen burglars shot and killed by homeowner's son.
bshwalker
03/31/17 5:14:15 PM
#131:


Lil_Bit83 posted...
vicedungwinsgam posted...
how in fucks name is the getaway driver facing murder charges

that's the dumbest shit i've ever heard of



I have no idea. I can understand the driver being jailed as an accomplice to the crime, but not for murder. That's dumb.


It's the law.
If a person dies during the commission of a crime, all parties involved are charged with murder.
As I mentioned before, even if a person suffers a fatal heart attack during a crime, those commitng the crime are charged with murder.
The driver drove 3 people to a house to commit a crime. The crime led to 3 fatalities. It doesn't matter that the criminals were the ones killed. Had she not driven them there, she wouldn't be charged with anything. As far as the law is concerned, she drove 3 people to a location and they were killed as a result of her actions.
The resident was defending himself from invaders with deadly weapons. She brought them there assuming that they wouldn't have been killed. She was wrong.
Her actions set the following actions in motion.
The law doesn't flex or sway. Her being charged with murder is the default.
She should have known that.
The law is based on the theory of people knowing that.
It's not the laws fault that she didn't spend more time learning about the law instead of orchestrating criminal activity.
She was ignorant.
Now she's charged with murder.
---
Being called nostalgic is a compliment. Thanks for noticing!
~C.O.I.~
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1