LogFAQs > #876786615

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Hillary on why she lost to Trump
Inviso 04/08/17 9:23:11 AM #62:	Wanglicious posted... ...your point is that it doesn't fit the dictionary definition of shrill but reminds people of a shrill voice because it's annoying, grating, and hurts a person's ears due to the way her voice and mannerism is? that's your point? that people use the wrong word to describe how annoying her voice is? that's incredibly petty. Shrill has negative connotations associated with it. Hillary is described as shrill. You just said that Hillary's voice doesn't fit that definition, yet it still sounds "right" to you to describe her as such. Convenient. --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso <cite>Inviso posted [p:876786615] in Hillary on... [t:75208831]...</cite> <quote><cite>Wanglicious posted...</cite> <quote>...your point is that it doesn't fit the dictionary definition of shrill but reminds people of a shrill voice because it's annoying, grating, and hurts a person's ears due to the way her voice and mannerism is? that's your point? that people use the wrong word to describe how annoying her voice is? that's incredibly petty.</quote> Shrill has negative connotations associated with it. Hillary is described as shrill. You just said that Hillary's voice doesn't fit that definition, yet it still sounds "right" to you to describe her as such. Convenient. --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1