LogFAQs > #878156368

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 88: Nobody knew trade deals could be so complicated
Kenri 04/29/17 5:42:37 PM #191:	Nelson_Mandela posted... Not_an_Owl posted... Ergo, if you accept even the possibility that that is our future then you should be supporting anything that might possibly divert us from that fate, like decreasing our carbon emissions and shifting to renewable energy. You understand that this is often at the expense of economic stagnation right? He covered this with "or they don't care because those carbon emissions make them rich" tbh Nelson_Mandela posted... Regardless of what you think about the article, do you think boycotting the NY Times for hiring a "contrarian" commentator is really the right move? No because it's a clear capitalist action and capitalism sucks. --- The gurus prayed, but the prayer was absorbed by DpObliVion. <cite>Kenri posted [p:878156368] in Politics C... [t:75282365]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nelson_Mandela posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Not_an_Owl posted...</cite> <quote>Ergo, if you accept even the possibility that that is our future then you should be supporting anything that might possibly divert us from that fate, like decreasing our carbon emissions and shifting to renewable energy. </quote> You understand that this is often at the expense of economic stagnation right?</quote> He covered this with "or they don't care because those carbon emissions make them rich" tbh <cite>Nelson_Mandela posted...</cite> <quote>Regardless of what you think about the article, do you think boycotting the NY Times for hiring a "contrarian" commentator is really the right move?</quote> No because it's a clear capitalist action and capitalism sucks. --- The gurus prayed, but the prayer was absorbed by DpObliVion.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1