LogFAQs > #878618909

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Was the civil war REALLY about slavery?
MARKINGRAM22 05/07/17 12:41:07 AM #7:	It was part of it, but Lincoln would have dropped it if it meant preserving the union, and it isn't like the people fighting for the south were slave owners. The people who owned slaves were a very small percent of people with money that weren't going to fight. As you said, Lincoln didn't care, had many conflicting quotes, and was very oppressive in how he ran his govt. Doesn't mean either side was right, but like most wars, both sides are led by corrupt politicians. --- "That man practices Islam. Are you happy he was taken out since according to you he believes what terrorists do?" -VipaGTS to me <cite>MARKINGRAM22 posted [p:878618909] in Was the ci... [t:75319740]...</cite> <quote>It was part of it, but Lincoln would have dropped it if it meant preserving the union, and it isn't like the people fighting for the south were slave owners. The people who owned slaves were a very small percent of people with money that weren't going to fight. As you said, Lincoln didn't care, had many conflicting quotes, and was very oppressive in how he ran his govt. Doesn't mean either side was right, but like most wars, both sides are led by corrupt politicians. --- "That man practices Islam. Are you happy he was taken out since according to you he believes what terrorists do?" -VipaGTS to me</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1