LogFAQs > #878941024

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Contest Stats and Discussion - Part 1271
BlAcK TuRtLe 05/12/17 12:31:28 AM #5:	Haste_2 posted... I am puzzled how polarized predictions were for 1995/1987. Everyone who picked '95 thought it would be a blowout. And then like five people had '87 winning. Think that's a result of 2 different schools of thought pre-contest. Most people figured the years would be as strong as their strongest game, but others figured depth would matter. This is probably the most egregious example of single game strength vs raw depth of field, but 2000/1996 will have similar results. --- DpObliVion, my hat is off to you. Welcome to the Guru Champions Club lol xstats <cite>BlAcK TuRtLe posted [p:878941024] in Contest St... [t:75337167]...</cite> <quote><cite>Haste_2 posted...</cite> <quote>I am puzzled how polarized predictions were for 1995/1987. Everyone who picked '95 thought it would be a blowout. And then like five people had '87 winning.</quote> Think that's a result of 2 different schools of thought pre-contest. Most people figured the years would be as strong as their strongest game, but others figured depth would matter. This is probably the most egregious example of single game strength vs raw depth of field, but 2000/1996 will have similar results. --- DpObliVion, my hat is off to you. Welcome to the Guru Champions Club lol xstats</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1