LogFAQs > #879476724

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Rigged Contest Stats and Discussion - Part 1275
Mac Arrowny 05/20/17 2:50:57 PM #18:	CaptainOfCrush posted... I now think there are four matches where, even within the constraints of SBAllen's chosen format, the loser may at least plausibly bring up the point of pictures costing them the match: 2006 vs 2011 1996 vs 2000 1991 vs 1994 2001 vs 1997 I'm sure somewhere, there exists a person whose only four misses are the ones above. You have my sword, sir. (I'm 2-2 myself so I'll hereby stop complaining about that 2000 match) If you're throwing 1991 vs. 1994 in there, you can argue that 1995 would've beaten 2001 with the PS1 in the pic. --- All the stars in the sky are waiting for you. <cite>Mac Arrowny posted [p:879476724] in Rigged Con... [t:75366847]...</cite> <quote><cite>CaptainOfCrush posted...</cite> <quote>I now think there are four matches where, even within the constraints of SBAllen's chosen format, the loser may at least plausibly bring up the point of pictures costing them the match: 2006 vs 2011 1996 vs 2000 1991 vs 1994 2001 vs 1997 I'm sure somewhere, there exists a person whose only four misses are the ones above. You have my sword, sir. (I'm 2-2 myself so I'll hereby stop complaining about that 2000 match)</quote> If you're throwing 1991 vs. 1994 in there, you can argue that 1995 would've beaten 2001 with the PS1 in the pic. --- All the stars in the sky are waiting for you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1