LogFAQs > #880220051

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Mercenaries Draft Week 4 Wartime: Tapped Out, Mill Deck by FFDragon
Corrik 06/01/17 3:59:59 PM #148:	KanzarisKelshen posted... Gatarix posted... I still think it shouldn't be an autowin. It should be the same as if Corrik timed out. If the resulting match is super obvious (see: Lopen/God) then that can be an autowin, but in the meantime, there's still a team there. This is something where we feel like the precedent could stand to use a change. What use do we the admin team have for quitters? None whatsoever. It feels wrong to reward them with wins in case something breaks the wrong way for the other team (got owned by shellmaggeddon for example). We'd rather the guy who's there get a reward for activity. This is obviously dependent on the quit's circumstances to a point - if somebody quit because they were going crazy from the stress we might use the bormina rule - but in this situation it was just a ragequit. And screw being nice to people who act like children. Not a ragequit. Your narrative continues to fail. If a union leader did what you did in a union, the union aould riot. I stand by my principles that you do not make rulings to benefif one person at the expense of everyone else if you can avoid it. The only person who was gonna ragequit was gravy and you folded like a cheap suit in response. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:880220051] in Mercenarie... [t:75407902]...</cite> <quote><cite>KanzarisKelshen posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Gatarix posted...</cite> <quote>I still think it shouldn't be an autowin. It should be the same as if Corrik timed out. If the resulting match is super obvious (see: Lopen/God) then that can be an autowin, but in the meantime, there's still a team there.</quote> This is something where we feel like the precedent could stand to use a change. What use do we the admin team have for quitters? None whatsoever. It feels wrong to reward them with wins in case something breaks the wrong way for the other team (got owned by shellmaggeddon for example). We'd rather the guy who's there get a reward for activity. This is obviously dependent on the quit's circumstances to a point - if somebody quit because they were going crazy from the stress we might use the bormina rule - but in this situation it was just a ragequit. And screw being nice to people who act like children.</quote> Not a ragequit. Your narrative continues to fail. If a union leader did what you did in a union, the union aould riot. I stand by my principles that you do not make rulings to benefif one person at the expense of everyone else if you can avoid it. The only person who was gonna ragequit was gravy and you folded like a cheap suit in response. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1