LogFAQs > #880637786

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	This was the 25 y/o BLONDE Girl who leaked Documents of RUSSIA HACKING!!!
Zeus 06/08/17 1:58:30 AM #16:	OmegaM posted... If Russia was trying to hack our elections, that seems like something we'd want to know; but I assume the NSA had reasons for wanting to keep that evidence secret. What she revealed doesn't seem as urgent for us to know as, say, evidence that Russia actually caused Trump to win. They weren't trying to hack our elections. There's been zero evidence to even a suspicion of that. The claim was that they were trying to influence our election by "hacking" the DNC and leaking those documents which, again, we don't have a lot of proof of beyond the country of origin and that's assuming that the attack wasn't routed through Russia. In this day and age, it's very easy to fake all kinds of details and it would be natural to put the blame on Russia although it's also natural to suspect either Russian citizens or the Russian government. Lightning Bolt posted... She just gets less and less attractive as the pictures go on... She is hideous. YahooPoster posted... Seems to fit the definition of whistle blowing, actually. Except not in the least. The motivations aren't there and the information isn't particularly benefiting the public. By your definition, ANY leaked information would be whistleblowing. Ogurisama posted... So if it is proven that Russia to fix the election, Again, the claim isn't that Russia tried to "fix" the election, it was that they interfered in the election. Ogurisama posted... but Trump is innocent (not knowing that Russia did such a thing) what happens. Nothing. The only way that Trump might be affected would be if Russia had actually hacked the voting system -- something for which we have no reason to even suspect and no proof during the recount -- but even then the result would probably stand. JTekashiro posted... Wait... do people still think Russia wasn't involved in the US election? I'm guessing they also think 9/11 was an inside job... You have it reversed, given that 9/11 being an inside job is a conspiracy theory and Russia hacking the DNC is a conspiracy theory; which isn't to say that both theories are equally absurd, but that both are theories regarding conspiracy. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:880637786] in This was t... [t:75426923]...</cite> <quote><cite>OmegaM posted...</cite> <quote>If Russia was trying to hack our elections, that seems like something we'd want to know; but I assume the NSA had reasons for wanting to keep that evidence secret. What she revealed doesn't seem as urgent for us to know as, say, evidence that Russia actually caused Trump to win.</quote> They weren't trying to hack our elections. There's been zero evidence to even a suspicion of that. The claim was that they were trying to influence our election by "hacking" the DNC and leaking those documents which, again, we don't have a lot of proof of beyond the country of origin and that's assuming that the attack wasn't routed through Russia. In this day and age, it's very easy to fake all kinds of details and it would be natural to put the blame on Russia although it's also natural to suspect either Russian citizens or the Russian government. <cite>Lightning Bolt posted...</cite> <quote>She just gets less and less attractive as the pictures go on...</quote> She is hideous. <cite>YahooPoster posted...</cite> <quote>Seems to fit the definition of whistle blowing, actually.</quote> Except not in the least. The motivations aren't there and the information isn't particularly benefiting the public. By your definition, ANY leaked information would be whistleblowing. <cite>Ogurisama posted...</cite> <quote>So if it is proven that Russia to fix the election, </quote> Again, the claim isn't that Russia tried to "fix" the election, it was that they interfered in the election. <cite>Ogurisama posted...</cite> <quote>but Trump is innocent (not knowing that Russia did such a thing) what happens. </quote> Nothing. The only way that Trump might be affected would be if Russia had actually hacked the voting system -- something for which we have no reason to even suspect and no proof during the recount -- but even then the result would probably stand. <cite>JTekashiro posted...</cite> <quote>Wait... do people still think Russia wasn't involved in the US election? I'm guessing they also think 9/11 was an inside job...</quote> You have it reversed, given that 9/11 being an inside job is a conspiracy theory and Russia hacking the DNC is a conspiracy theory; which isn't to say that both theories are equally absurd, but that both are theories regarding conspiracy. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1