LogFAQs > #881153087

I like Nana a little bit more now that he's doing things again. (I know, I know. I have barely any room to talk on that front.) Some of his logic feels potentially forced to me, for lack of a better word, but if I'm honest I feel the same way about plenty of interactions here -- probably because they're chock full of terminology that's still kinda alien to me. So that's not going to be my strongest suit right now, discerning the fake interaction from the more reasonable. My technique to ensure I'm not completely incapable is to just seek out dialogue that feels disingenuous in tone and structure, and to look for moments when players bring someone up seemingly at random.

(This leads me to a bit of a thought tangent: half the arguments on the net spawn from folks misunderstanding someone's posting style and misinterpreting their text as hostile. Newbie guess here: mislynches occur often due to similar circumstances.)

Speaking of moments when players bring someone up seemingly at random, here's an instance of it that I really like: Chris reminding us to be cautious over Leo. I agree with Chris that Leo may have gotten off the hook too easily with his claim. Maybe it shouldn't come as a surprise that one of the guys I suspected Day 1 is still on my suspect list. It's a gut feeling which I chose to ignore, to let subside, after Stan claimed + Stan died + FFD was mislynched. At that point, I was like, "Jeff, your gut is premature and underdeveloped, it's embryonic, maybe don't talk about having doubt toward Leo any further." So I told myself he's probably town.

Heck, I don't know. Maybe he is town. I'm weary about voting someone with a role claim. I don't know the odds he's lying in this particular case. But I wanted to at least reiterate what Chris said, that maybe we shouldn't be so quick to dismiss him altogether. That's all, I guess.
---

Intel Ops 1964 Kennedy | Die Hard Drive with a Vengeance | 54x Carthaginian Corsair Privateer | Guardian Force Bahamut