LogFAQs > #881277404

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	What ideology is most responsible for terrorism in the USA?
Amputation 06/17/17 4:56:20 AM #24:	-Gavirulax- posted... Amputation posted... I didn't even bring up Islam in the first post. Try again. Deliberately being obtuse doesn't invalidate valid criticism, unless one is to believe that you're only accountable for opening posts. Now you certainly did mention something drowned in Islam in the 4th post, pretending that because that wasn't directly quoted means you can pull "try again" (not a defense) shows gimmicks that rely entirely on emotional e-arguments, which isn't all that shocking given the mentality. Amputation posted... Every right winger I know in the USA says they are for limited government, but their wishes, demands, and votes say otherwise. -Gavirulax- posted... It has quite a lot to do with it if we ignore the usual (and very uninspired) right-wing bashing in this topic - which of course does invalidate the topic as a whole. Islam was only addressed because it was brought up. I could have went this entire topic without it. Nobody was being obtuse - you're just looking for a scapegoat for your right-wing beliefs being intertwined with the majority of terrorism in the USA. The best way to do that is "but.. Islam!" It's like the "but, Hillary!" or "But, Obama!" for Trump defenders. eats the red herring --- Now Playing: Overwatch, Etrian Odyssey Untold: The Millennium Girl <cite>Amputation posted [p:881277404] in What ideol... [t:75471280]...</cite> <quote><cite>-Gavirulax- posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputation posted...</cite> <quote>I didn't even bring up Islam in the first post. Try again.</quote> Deliberately being obtuse doesn't invalidate valid criticism, unless one is to believe that you're only accountable for opening posts. Now you certainly did mention something drowned in Islam in the 4th post, pretending that because that wasn't directly quoted means you can pull "try again" (not a defense) shows gimmicks that rely entirely on emotional e-arguments, which isn't all that shocking given the mentality. <cite>Amputation posted...</cite> <quote>Every right winger I know in the USA says they are for limited government, but their wishes, demands, and votes say otherwise.</quote> <cite>-Gavirulax- posted...</cite> <quote>It has quite a lot to do with it if we ignore the usual (and very uninspired) right-wing bashing in this topic - which of course does invalidate the topic as a whole.</quote></quote> Islam was only addressed because it was brought up. I could have went this entire topic without it. Nobody was being obtuse - you're just looking for a scapegoat for your right-wing beliefs being intertwined with the majority of terrorism in the USA. The best way to do that is "but.. Islam!" It's like the "but, Hillary!" or "But, Obama!" for Trump defenders. eats the red herring --- Now Playing: Overwatch, Etrian Odyssey Untold: The Millennium Girl</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1