Anyways, all Islamic terror in America is right-wing; religiously motivated in an attempt to modify progressive behavior.
You aren't helping the case I think you are trying to make.
The only point I've made has been spelled out (and re-quoted by myself), more than once. I didn't expect that you would change the right-wing bashing however there is something to be said for naming a behavior.
It's not "right-wing bashing". It's an absolute fact that RW's are responsible for the most violent terror incidents in the United States.
In a very simple world that would mean something I guess... Indeed, right wing extremists come in all shades, genders and colors, white, brown, yellow, black and from all walks of life (straight, gay, Christian, Muslim, etc).
Thankfully some of us can differentiate an angry Christian who blows up a place because of abortion and a Muslim who shoots 49 LGBT members because he thinks ISIS is the truest form his religion takes because they literally follow the Quran and Hadiths and thus, being a martyr for the cause will equate to instant paradise as per the teachings.
While the question initially posed is both easy and expected (no great surprise), we have the luxury of delving much further into what makes people tick, which in the majority of terrorist cases (especially by fatality), is religion. Thus dissecting said religion and having as the foolish leader of the UK says "embarrassing conversations" (about text people quite literally live their lives by, as crazy as it may sound) is indeed necessary.
Yeah, not sure what point you are trying to make. Maybe I'm just tired, but it appears you are proving my point whilst.. Arguing it? The examples you gave to "differentiate" were both examples of RW terrorism. ---
Now Playing: Overwatch, Etrian Odyssey Untold: The Millennium Girl